It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Movescamp
reply to post by Adamanteus
First off bull s. It is a known fact they discard shark. Why do commercial fisherman who troll giant nets throw away the fish they are not fishing for? All that protein gone to waste.
Secondly, if your boat only holds x amount and it's either fins that bring more money that's what they will fish.
Third do you remember what happened in new England whenthere were no rules for commercial fisherman? Near extinction.
The conservation methods have worked wonderfully. I am a proud member of the CCA even when it was the GCCA. Thanks to commercial overfishing anglers like me are severly restricted on what I can bring home. Fine with me. But companies like Tyson sub out to giant factory boats that process on the water and throw out plenty of protein.
The conservation acts have all been pretty well Studied and the rates of fishing are directly correlated to spawning.
If left to commercial fisherman it is a well established fact overfishing is done. Even in the us. Look at Atlantic COD.
Originally posted by Movescamp
reply to post by Adamanteus
B.s. Yes i admit I am an angler. The CCA has made huge differences in the revitalization of the gulf coast fisheries. Lack of regulation by commercial fisherman actually decimated fisheries especially on the east coast
Finning happens. You are the ignorant one here.
vimeo.com...#/13416490
m.youtube.com...#/watch?v=bfxvfBONcWQ
I know there is plenty of propaganda but that doesnt make it not true.
Over fishing happens too and it is these regulations which correspond directly to spawning that makes healthy fisheries.
Originally posted by Adamanteus
I never said Commercial fishermen shouldn't be regulated. Did I? I just stated that the practice of finning is propaganda.
What is Shark Finning?
* Shark finning refers to the removal and retention of shark fins and the discard at sea of the carcass. The shark is most often still alive when it is tossed back into the water. Unable to swim, the shark slowly sinks toward the bottom where it is eaten alive by other fish.
* Shark finning takes place at sea so the fishers have only the fins to transport. Shark meat is considered low value and therefore not worth the cost of transporting the bulky shark bodies to market.
* Any shark is taken-regardless of age, size, or species.
* Longlines, used in shark finning operations, are the most significant cause of losses in shark populations worldwide.
* Shark finning is widespread, and largely unmanaged and unmonitored.
* Shark finning has increased over the past decade due to the increasing demand for shark fins (for shark fin soup and traditional cures), improved fishing technology, and improved market economics.
* Shark specialists estimate that 100 million sharks are killed for their fins, annually.
* One pound of dried shark fin can retail for $300 or more. It's a multi-billion dollar industry.
Originally posted by frugal
Maybe they migrate there in the winter and have babies?
Originally posted by RogerT
Originally posted by Adamanteus
I never said Commercial fishermen shouldn't be regulated. Did I? I just stated that the practice of finning is propaganda.
Again I refer you to Rob Stewart's documentary Sharkwater. www.sharkwater.com...
There is plenty of video evidence in that movie to make a powerful case that 'finning' is very real, not propoganda as you wish us to believe.
The film won 31 international awards.
Directly from his website:
What is Shark Finning?
* Shark finning refers to the removal and retention of shark fins and the discard at sea of the carcass. The shark is most often still alive when it is tossed back into the water. Unable to swim, the shark slowly sinks toward the bottom where it is eaten alive by other fish.
* Shark finning takes place at sea so the fishers have only the fins to transport. Shark meat is considered low value and therefore not worth the cost of transporting the bulky shark bodies to market.
* Any shark is taken-regardless of age, size, or species.
* Longlines, used in shark finning operations, are the most significant cause of losses in shark populations worldwide.
* Shark finning is widespread, and largely unmanaged and unmonitored.
* Shark finning has increased over the past decade due to the increasing demand for shark fins (for shark fin soup and traditional cures), improved fishing technology, and improved market economics.
* Shark specialists estimate that 100 million sharks are killed for their fins, annually.
* One pound of dried shark fin can retail for $300 or more. It's a multi-billion dollar industry.
There is plenty more info there:
www.sharkwater.com...
Originally posted by works4dhs
Originally posted by Adamanteus
Originally posted by skeptic_al
reply to post by ProtoplasmicTraveler
Don't tell the Japs, It will make an awefull lot of Sharks Fin Soup. And they'll leave the Ocean floor full of live shark bodies.
Another case of misinformation by the mass media to get the people to back their cause.
The Japanese are an island nation that lives mainly on fish ,why would they discard an edible source of protein? When I was Shark Fishing the meat accounted for 1/3 of our profits. Why on Earth would someone discard a perfectly marketable product?edit on 4-2-2011 by Adamanteus because: (no reason given)edit on 4-2-2011 by Adamanteus because: (no reason given)
I have no problem wi harvesting marine life for human food, but the thought of killing a shark just for a fin and discarding the rest, esp if it's an endangered species, is a bit much. some poachers will kill a rhino just for it's horn and leave the carcass to rot. are these shark fins and rhino horns that valuable?
Originally posted by TechVampyre
reply to post by jaynkeel
it is north to south. Why would they go south to north if it is cold north?