It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
You think it's a defeat that he doesn't know the exact average "size" - whatever that means - of the debris?
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
reply to post by ATH911
Oh right, okay. Well, from that throwaway remark I surmise that the average size of the pieces of debris was 41.78423 cm.
Will this do?
I can't even begin to see why you want to know the answer.
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
Because no matter how much you go on about it, I can't even begin to see why you want to know the answer.
Originally posted by ATH911
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
Because no matter how much you go on about it, I can't even begin to see why you want to know the answer.
Well if you would READ what I say, maybe you would. Let me try again:
isn't one of the major reasons you skeptics like to compare the crash of Flight 1771 is because that plane was reduced to "mostly small parts"?
Originally posted by ATH911
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
Because no matter how much you go on about it, I can't even begin to see why you want to know the answer.
Well if you would READ what I say, maybe you would. Let me try again:
isn't one of the major reasons you skeptics like to compare the crash of Flight 1771 is because that plane was reduced to "mostly small parts"?
Flight 93 crashed after a struggle in the cockpit and no one has shown any evidence to the contrary.
However, contrary to the statement quoted above....the passengers (and cabin crew assisting) in revolt DID NOT manage to breach the flight deck....they could have, except the hi-jackers in control, on the flight deck, decided to commit suicide SHORT of their intended target, rather than the alternative....which may have been a "struggle in the cockpit" scenario.
Great how you read their minds....
If the Flight Deck was not breached why the heck would they crash the plane into a field??
While on their "suicide" mission, were they worried if the passengers and crew managed to force their way in then they might get hurt??
So instead they thought, he guys, lets just nosedive into an empty field. no point trying to reach our target now, they're banging on the door...
[/ex]
So what should they have done when the passengers kicked in the door? Surrender?
Hijackers realized passengers were about to break in - While passngers may have killed the hijackers in
process of regaining control ( at least 1 , possible 2 were killed in cabin when passengers rushed cockpit ) was
chance would be taken alive. At this point would not only have failed in mission of taking down US Capitol
but would have been interogated to reveal everything they knew about Bin Laden and any other plots
From news reports of other "interogations" CIA was able to crack them and spill everything
[Personally would liked to see some of them in Gitmo having head shoved into toilet during game of "find the
Koran")
To avoid this choose "death before dishonor" and crashed airplane killing themselves and everyone else on board
Japanese in WWII was famous for this killing themselves to avoid capture or launching wild "banzai" charges
to kill as many Allied soldiers as possible before being killed
Originally posted by backinblack
Great how you read their minds....
If the Flight Deck was not breached why the heck would they crash the plane into a field??
While on their "suicide" mission, were they worried if the passengers and crew managed to force their way in then they might get hurt??
So instead they thought, he guys, lets just nosedive into an empty field. no point trying to reach our target now, they're banging on the door...
Originally posted by thedeman
So what should they have done when the passengers kicked in the door? Surrender?
Hijackers realized passengers were about to break in - While passngers may have killed the hijackers in
process of regaining control ( at least 1 , possible 2 were killed in cabin when passengers rushed cockpit ) was
chance would be taken alive. At this point would not only have failed in mission of taking down US Capitol
but would have been interogated to reveal everything they knew about Bin Laden and any other plots
From news reports of other "interogations" CIA was able to crack them and spill everything
[Personally would liked to see some of them in Gitmo having head shoved into toilet during game of "find the
Koran")
To avoid this choose "death before dishonor" and crashed airplane killing themselves and everyone else on board
Japanese in WWII was famous for this killing themselves to avoid capture or launching wild "banzai" charges
to kill as many Allied soldiers as possible before being killed
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by weedwhacker
However, contrary to the statement quoted above....the passengers (and cabin crew assisting) in revolt DID NOT manage to breach the flight deck....they could have, except the hi-jackers in control, on the flight deck, decided to commit suicide SHORT of their intended target, rather than the alternative....which may have been a "struggle in the cockpit" scenario.
Great how you read their minds....
If the Flight Deck was not breached why the heck would they crash the plane into a field??
While on their "suicide" mission, were they worried if the passengers and crew managed to force their way in then they might get hurt??
So instead they thought, he guys, lets just nosedive into an empty field. no point trying to reach our target now, they're banging on the door...
That's just too funny weed...
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
I did read it, and I'm sorry, but so what?
Originally posted by ATH911
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
I did read it, and I'm sorry, but so what?
I'm sorry, but people here expect there to be a certain amount of intelligence to participate in meaningful debate. Trying coming back in a couple of years.edit on 4-2-2011 by ATH911 because: (no reason given)