It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Miraj
reply to post by beezzer
I can't.
I don't put any stock in any politician.
I stop saying "X will save our country."
I try to vote on what they claim their policies are but I realize this will likely be betrayed.
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by Janky Red
The house and senate were controlled by the democrat party.
Guess you think they are blame-less?
Originally posted by Advantage
More damage has been done in 2 years than I can recall ever happening in a presidents term in my lifetime.. and Im not a spring chicken.
Originally posted by Janky Red
Originally posted by anon72
One thing I can assure you of...If McCain/Palin has won... we wouldn't be in the mess we are in now. IMO.
The mess that Bush presided over
You mean the 6,500 DOW
or
the million jobs we were losing each month?
I must admit I am a little bummed, we could be in the Greatest Depression, riding donkeys or shooting them for fun, nuking Iran every other day -
It is real easy to forget where we were 2 years ago - the DOW is back, the housing market is stabilizing and people are spending like crazy in my neck of the woods, I have not seen it this busy in years. Not crediting Obama persayedit on 26-1-2011 by Janky Red because: (no reason given)
The majority report finds fault with two Fed chairmen: Alan Greenspan, who led the central bank as the housing bubble expanded, and his successor, Ben S. Bernanke, who did not foresee the crisis but played a crucial role in the response. It criticizes Mr. Greenspan for advocating deregulation and cites a “pivotal failure to stem the flow of toxic mortgages” under his leadership as a “prime example” of negligence.
It also criticizes the Bush administration’s “inconsistent response” to the crisis — allowing Lehman Brothers to collapse in September 2008 after earlier bailing out another bank, Bear Stearns, with Fed help — as having “added to the uncertainty and panic in the financial markets.”
Originally posted by anon72
reply to post by beezzer
I even got my polilitical sign that reflected what I thought.
Palin/McCain that expressed how the wife & I felt about it all.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/9196a8041a7d.jpg[/atsimg]
You'll be seeing the actual sign w/ me in it probably.... in 2012 (less Mr. McCain....)
Originally posted by Janky Red
Originally posted by Advantage
More damage has been done in 2 years than I can recall ever happening in a presidents term in my lifetime.. and Im not a spring chicken.
This is simply not true, the damage has been going on since Ronald Reagan accrued 150% national debt.
In fact the majority of our current debt is comprised of Ronald Reagan compounded interest on the debt he
created. Subsequent presidents piled on Reagan's intial pile -
When the vet says "your dog has cancer" does that mean your dog just got cancer as he spoke the words ?
How about when there is an auto accident? Do you place all the blame the EMT because the victim is now unable to walk? They were able to walk before the accident, WTF did that EMT do???
You talk about realist, come on
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by Janky Red
If we are comparing, how about the 4.5% unemployment (Bush) vs the 10% that Obama now owns after TWO YEARS!
Originally posted by anon72
Yep, me and the AP. I just knew you would come along and say something.
Kinda Curious to this question: Were do you get you news that you read/listen/trust? (if that is possible).
In case you missed the lastest confimation that Obama is a lying flimflam artist, check this thread out:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by TexasChem
So why do you come and bash Palin, Reagan and Bush every single time Obamas weaknesess are pointed out?
WASHINGTON – Republicans have already violated some of the vows they made in taking stewardship of the House.
Their pledge to cut $100 billion from the budget in one year won't be kept.
The effort to repeal the health care law, for one, is expected to pass in the House and fail in the Senate, going nowhere.
CUT SPENDING: "We will roll back government spending to pre-stimulus, pre-bailout levels, saving us at least $100 billion in the first year alone," the GOP pledge stated.
It turns out $100 billion is way out of reach.
REFORM CONGRESS: "We will let any lawmaker — Democrat or Republican — offer amendments to reduce spending," the pledge said. "
Despite the promise of more open debate and the opportunity to offer floor amendments, GOP leaders will bring legislation to repeal Obama's signature health care overhaul bill to the floor next week and deny Democrats any chance to try to preserve popular provisions.
See link for full article..
Originally posted by Janky Red
Like it or not the economy is booming in my city, it will make its way out to your parts