It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by FDNY343
Originally posted by kaya82
members of the 9/11 commission came out to say it was a joke and the government are goin out there way to hide info from the public
Citation Needed. (Hint: The 9/11 Commissioners said later AFTER the investigation that they were satisfied that they got the truth)
9/11 - the big cover-up?
Even the chair of the 9/11 Commission now admits that the official evidence they were given was 'far from the truth'.
The chair and vice chair of the 9/11 Commission, respectively Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton, assert in their book, Without Precedent, that they were "set up to fail" and were starved of funds to do a proper investigation. They also confirm that they were denied access to the truth and misled by senior officials in the Pentagon and the federal aviation authority; and that this obstruction and deception led them to contemplate slapping officials with criminal charges.
Despite the many public statements by 9/11 commissioners and staff members acknowledging they were repeatedly lied to, not a single person has ever been charged, tried, or even reprimanded, for lying to the 9/11 Commission.
The final report did not examine key evidence, and neglected serious anomalies in the various accounts of what happened. The commissioners admit their report was incomplete and flawed, and that many questions about the terror attacks remain unanswered. Nevertheless, the 9/11 Commission was swiftly closed down on August 21 2004.
Originally posted by Six Sigma
A defense psychologist testified that Zacarias Moussaoui is a paranoid schizophrenic with delusions. That could be part of it.
Originally posted by vipertech0596
reply to post by gladtobehere
Realization that his attempted insanity defense was not going to work? Realization that, pleading guilty for his actions/plans might ensure that he could possibly walk out of prison many years from now....rather than dying inside of one?
Originally posted by gladtobehere
reply to post by vipertech0596
Originally posted by vipertech0596
reply to post by gladtobehere
Realization that his attempted insanity defense was not going to work? Realization that, pleading guilty for his actions/plans might ensure that he could possibly walk out of prison many years from now....rather than dying inside of one?
Well theres that or he was simply asking for the opportunity to expose what we already know about 9/11.
I have to wonder what exactly got him the label of "delusional". His assertion that the government was involved in the attacks...?
Using that criteria, 95% of ATS members would be declared "delusional" not to mention more than half of New Yorkers.
Half of New Yorkers Believe US Leaders Had Foreknowledge of Impending 9-11 Attacks and "Consciously Failed" To Act; 66% Call For New Probe of Unanswered Questions by Congress or New York's Attorney General, New Zogby Poll Reveals
The establishment would probably recommend that the entire German population be heavily "sedated".
Poll in Germany: 89.5 doubt official version of 9/11
Originally posted by Shadow Herder
Everything seems to be scripted. Check out the video of patsy Ziad Jarrah, alleged hijacker of alleged flight 93.
This is his martyrdom video.....
You can tell that he believed this was all a joke or for a training exercise. Nothing he is saying comes from his own mind and was prepared for him to read. In retrospect you can tell he doesnt believe this is serious or even real. He can barely contain himself from laughing.edit on 21-1-2011 by Shadow Herder because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by FDNY343
reply to post by thedman
Agreed. I could go on for days. But, lets just see what this guy/gal has to say.
I'm willing to bet he won't be back to defend himself.
Originally posted by pshea38
Originally posted by FDNY343
reply to post by thedman
Agreed. I could go on for days. But, lets just see what this guy/gal has to say.
I'm willing to bet he won't be back to defend himself.
i can not comment on individual cases. what is clear is that if you visit the aforementioned websites, you cannot but admit that the number of blatant fakeries is beyond question. very little information is available for the vast majority of the victims and most memorial photographs and condolances look to be contrived. it has been proven that numerous actors had been used on 9/11 in conjuction with a complicit media who report streaming live images of the event which was later shown to have been impossible.www.septemberclues.info. also it has been shown that numerous images of distressed individuals both seen in the buildings and jumping from the building display grave anomolies and some jumper images display clear signs of photoshopping.letsrollforums.com... under victim fraud/media fraud... i have no desire to upset anyones sensibilities but if so many aspects of that day are proven to be fake, then must we not open our minds to all possibilitiesedit on 23-1-2011 by pshea38 because: (no reason given)edit on 23-1-2011 by pshea38 because: (no reason given)edit on 23-1-2011 by pshea38 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by vipertech0596
reply to post by pshea38
How pathetic can the truth movement get? If you truly believe the majority of the victims were fake....then I truly feel sorry for you. That and I have some beachfront property in Utah I would like to sell you.
Originally posted by bl2k10
Originally posted by pshea38
Originally posted by FDNY343
reply to post by thedman
Agreed. I could go on for days. But, lets just see what this guy/gal has to say.
I'm willing to bet he won't be back to defend himself.
i can not comment on individual cases. what is clear is that if you visit the aforementioned websites, you cannot but admit that the number of blatant fakeries is beyond question. very little information is available for the vast majority of the victims and most memorial photographs and condolances look to be contrived. it has been proven that numerous actors had been used on 9/11 in conjuction with a complicit media who report streaming live images of the event which was later shown to have been impossible.www.septemberclues.info. also it has been shown that numerous images of distressed individuals both seen in the buildings and jumping from the building display grave anomolies and some jumper images display clear signs of photoshopping.letsrollforums.com... under victim fraud/media fraud... i have no desire to upset anyones sensibilities but if so many aspects of that day are proven to be fake, then must we not open our minds to all possibilitiesedit on 23-1-2011 by pshea38 because: (no reason given)edit on 23-1-2011 by pshea38 because: (no reason given)edit on 23-1-2011 by pshea38 because: (no reason given)
please show me proof of the actors, or is this just another thing that truthers want to believe
Originally posted by vipertech0596
reply to post by pshea38
There is no truly "new" information that has come to light in the last nine years. It has all been there. The only thing that changes is how the "truth" movement tries to pervert the facts to fit their cockamanie theories.
And certainly nothing to change the reality of that day. The reality that 19 men hijacked four airliners and turned them into guided missiles used in the worst terrorist attack in history.
no real evidense of any planes at any of the 'attacked' sites.
alot of the so-called truth movement are aligned with and shills of the government and are employed and funded to muddy the waters
Originally posted by okbmd
reply to post by pshea38
For starters , not even the most ardent or adamant "truthers" on this site give any credence to septemberclues or letsrollforums .
no real evidense of any planes at any of the 'attacked' sites.
This is totally false , aircraft debris was recovered at all of the sites .
No offence but , there is a lot you need to catch up on .
Originally posted by okbmd
reply to post by pshea38
alot of the so-called truth movement are aligned with and shills of the government and are employed and funded to muddy the waters
And what makes you think the sites you referenced don't fit this criteria ?