It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Late night Puterman? Being a bit of a stinker there. I did acknowledge the reasoning given for the angles in the simulator already.
Wouldn't the stuck asteroids been in motion before getting stuck?
Originally posted by SunnyDee
reply to post by nataylor
Wouldn't the stuck asteroids been in motion before getting stuck?
Point L3 is the one opposite us, on the other side of the sun. Of course, the STEREO spacecraft would have seen anything if there was a planet there.
Originally posted by SunnyDee
map.gsfc.nasa.gov...
All except point L5. This point is on the opposite side of the sun from earth at all times. Rumors of Planet X sitting at that point are mentioned! Ooooh, brought it back on topic! Well sorta.
enjoy.
Originally posted by SunnyDee
reply to post by nataylor
You're right L3. Typo. Yeah, you're right about Stereo too, but funny that the nasa page mentioned the rumor. But, wouldn't STEREO B show asteroids caught in point 3? Maybe they are too small, just speculating here. ETA: the field of vision of Stereo b does not seem to show the area of L3 does it? That area would be the earth's distance from the sun, right?edit on 1-7-2011 by SunnyDee because: (no reason given)
Yup, they would be around the same age as the Earth. The L4 and L5 points are about the same distance from the Earth as the sun is.
Originally posted by PuterMan
reply to post by nataylor
Mm, I have not had time to look these up yet, but what you are saying is that anything there would be possibly 4.5 billion years old or maybe a little younger? To actually land something on one of those and take a sample could answer many questions. Is that possible? How far out are these points?
Originally posted by Lil Drummerboy
I think it is safe to say that those that thought the theory of ELENIN being the size of a planet
would be wrong.
since it would be here by october,. It would be easily visible by any back yard scope,. in planet size
For example: I could see Jupiter and its 4 moons,. this last winter,.
But Elenin,.. not so much
and its 4 moons
Jupiter has 64 confirmed moons,
Yes you would be correct,.
Originally posted by heineken
Originally posted by Lil Drummerboy
I think it is safe to say that those that thought the theory of ELENIN being the size of a planet
would be wrong.
since it would be here by october,. It would be easily visible by any back yard scope,. in planet size
For example: I could see Jupiter and its 4 moons,. this last winter,.
But Elenin,.. not so much
Just to clarify for those who might interpret your statement in a wrong way..
your statement..
and its 4 moons
may sound like Jupiter has only 4 moons
m
i think you are referring to its 4 moons which are visible with your telescope
Jupiter has 64 confirmed moons,
Moons of Jupiteredit on 3-7-2011 by heineken because: (no reason given)