Bush Stomps off Stage Upset, page 4

posted on Jul, 11 2004 @ 09:06 PM

link

We need a dedicated President committed to establishing PEACE on the
planet instead of offending all the world leaders with arrogance.

slank

posted on Jul, 11 2004 @ 09:45 PM

link

Mako0956, I wonder if that is like the program that Cheney uses to move Bush around with?
Very funny. Here's the site again:
www.bushcartoon.com...
Thx Mako0956

mako0956

posted on Jul, 11 2004 @ 10:10 PM

link

Or, maybe his father?

shanti23

posted on Jul, 11 2004 @ 10:27 PM

link

Originally posted by mako0956
We need a dedicated President committed to establishing PEACE on the
planet instead of offending all the world leaders with arrogance.

That's the spirit

Here's how friendly Kenny Boy and Bush are/were:

www.thesmokinggun.com...

However, it seems the favourites for president have already pledged allegiance to another organisation, skull and bones.

www.infowars.com...

The face may change, but the agenda remains the same...

This is an historic moment. We have in this past year made great progress in ending the long era of conflict and cold war. We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves and for future generations a new world order, a world where the rule of law, not the law of the jungle, governs the conduct of nations.
President George Bush speech - Attack on Iraq - Washington D.C. - Jan 16th 1991

[edit on 11-7-2004 by shanti23]

cryptorsa1001

posted on Jul, 11 2004 @ 11:05 PM

link

I am wondering if any of you slamming Bush finished high school? I think you were busy doing your sister when brains were passed out? You all want to slam Bush but have not put forth any credible reasons or arguments for your slanderous tone towards the President. You want to blame Bush for everything. Have you heard of the Congress or the Senate?

Everyone thought Iraq had wmd. Edwards said in an interview that he would go it alone against Saddam if the UN did not go along with the war. Since the UN has a scandal involving the oil for food program do you think they were going to want to go to war and have their dirty secret exposed? What about the contracts the French had with Iraq over oil fields. The Russian weapons systems sold to Iraq after the sanctions were in effect. Saddam was giving suicide bombers families 20,000 or so to kill Israelis. How long till Israel struck back causing a much wider deadlier war? Saddam had to go and go he did. Instead of Al Qada attacking us in America they are occupied in Iraq. It was a good move to take out Saddam.

All political leaders meet with Business leaders. They all want money for their campaign war chest. I bet there has not been one leader that did not take money from someone with a less than reputable background. Kerry just gave back some money for just that reason.

Sauron

posted on Jul, 11 2004 @ 11:48 PM

link

cryptorsa1001

Everyone thought Iraq had wmd. Edwards said in an interview that he would go it alone against Saddam if the UN did not go along with the war. Since the UN has a scandal involving the oil for food program do you think they were going to want to go to war and have their dirty secret exposed? What about the contracts the French had with Iraq over oil fields. The Russian weapons systems sold to Iraq after the sanctions were in effect. Saddam was giving suicide bombers families 20,000 or so to kill Israelis. How long till Israel struck back causing a much wider deadlier war? Saddam had to go and go he did. Instead of Al Qada attacking us in America they are occupied in Iraq. It was a good move to take out Saddam

can you explain to us what your post has to do with this thread?

I am wondering if any of you slamming Bush finished high school? I think you were busy doing your sister when brains were passed out?

I also think the above quote is a bit rude.

I could answer.
But I won�t say that.

So If you could refrain from those types so comments, and stick to the topic of this thread, it would be greatly appreciated Thank you, Sauron

[edit on 12-7-2004 by Sauron]

nanna_of_6

posted on Jul, 12 2004 @ 03:12 AM

link

Originally posted by Johannmon

Helllo!!!! I suggest your read again my posts. They deal with the type of attacks that have been made on the president and how these are indicative of a state of moral decay in the country.

First of all, you seem very truculence in your defense of George W ( wrong-way) Bush, this leads me to beleive that you may have
voted for the man in 2000-2001, and is your right. So go ahead and stick-up for that recreant , that holds the title of President, thats your right to "free speech".
Second, if anyone is responsible for the so called "moral decay" in our country, it is G W Bush & Co.
People wouldn't be so down on the man if he wasn't so corrupted. It's hard to respect Bush when he's done NOTHING AT ALL to help or make things better for the citizens of the USA. He is a throwback from inbreeding .
Respect George W Bush you say, how do you exspect us to respect a man that sends our troops into a country for an oil-war , to ask our troops to lay down their lives for Corperate creed.
Respect George Bush Jr.,

, WHEN HELL FREEZES OVER

cryptorsa1001

posted on Jul, 12 2004 @ 12:34 PM

link

Where is your proof that the war was for oil?

nanna_of_6

posted on Jul, 12 2004 @ 06:34 PM

link

Originally posted by cryptorsa1001
Where is your proof that the war was for oil?

Here's your proof, it is a informative site and has a way of explaining things from what I have gathered.

The stated justification for the invasion included Iraqi production and use of weapons of mass destruction, links with terrorist organizations and human rights violations in Iraq under the Saddam Hussein government. To that end, the stated goals of the invasion, according to Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, were to:

end the Saddam Hussein government and help Iraq transition to democratic self-rule
find and eliminate weapons of mass destruction and terrorists
collect intelligence on networks of weapons of mass destruction and terrorists
end sanctions and to deliver humanitarian support
secure Iraq's oil fields and resources

en.wikipedia.org...

There you have it,

secure Iraq's oil fields and resources [quote/]

[edit on 12-7-2004 by nanna_of_6]

falcon

posted on Jul, 12 2004 @ 06:51 PM

link

Ready for another big scandle bushy

I am sure those ken lay bank account number's that were submitted to the washington post should prove to be a nice tie concidering the fact your bank account number's are on there with hillery clinton, ken star, along with but not limited to the connection to mark rich.

Let's rock bush round number 2 start's right now.

Peace

The one Known as "falcon"

Relentless

posted on Jul, 12 2004 @ 08:31 PM

link

Originally posted by falcon

Ready for another big scandle bushy
I am sure those ken lay bank account number's that were submitted to the washington post should prove to be a nice tie concidering the fact your bank account number's are on there with hillery clinton, ken star, along with but not limited to the connection to mark rich.

Let's rock bush round number 2 start's right now.

Peace

The one Known as "falcon"

So.... then it implicates everyone. Why is this another Bush beef?

Could we possibly stop making nothing out of nothing? Do you think anyone with a campaign fund has time to do a background check on every contribution. Ewwwww, think I'll send everyone running a hefty contribution so I can call in the chips whoever wins.

The real shame in this country is the most money wins. If you want to solve the problem we should demand that NO political contributions can be made at all. Take whatever is in the fund off our tax returns, split it up and let them try to impress us on an equal playing field.

Geez!!!

cryptorsa1001

posted on Jul, 12 2004 @ 08:47 PM

link

secure Iraq's oil fields and resources

He was talking about securing the oil fields from sabatoge when the attack began. We get more oil from Canada than we do from Iraq and Saudia Arabia combined. If we went there for the oil then why is the price per barrel of oil so high? That does not stand up to economies of scale.

Your proof is very weak. Try again

koji_K

posted on Jul, 12 2004 @ 08:58 PM
link

this is an interesting paper which has been mentioned in several threads before on ATS..

Although completely unreported by the U.S. media and government, the answer to the Iraq enigma is simple yet shocking -- it is in large part an oil currency war. One of the core reasons for this upcoming war is this administration's goal of preventing further Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) momentum towards the euro as an oil transaction currency standard. However, in order to pre-empt OPEC, they need to gain geo-strategic control of Iraq along with its 2nd largest proven oil reserves. The second coalescing factor that is driving the Iraq war is the quiet acknowledgement by respected oil geologists and possibly this administration is the impending phenomenon known as Global "Peak Oil." This is projected to occur around 2010, with Iraq and Saudi Arabia being the final two nations to reach peak oil production. The issue of Peak Oil has been added to the scope of this essay, along with the macroeconomics of `petrodollar recycling' and the unpublicized but genuine challenge to U.S. dollar hegemony from the euro as an alternative oil transaction currency. The author advocates graduated reform of the global monetary system including a dollar/euro currency `trading band' with reserve status parity, a dual OPEC oil transaction standard, and multilateral treaties via the UN regarding energy reform. Such reforms could potentially reduce future oil currency and oil warfare. The essay ends with a reflection and critique of current US economic and foreign policies. What happens in the 2004 US elections will have a large impact on the 21st century.

www.ratical.com...

-koji K.

nativeokie

posted on Jul, 12 2004 @ 09:06 PM
link

Okay so I find odd that no one has posted a video of this yet. Only reports are from one very left wing site (the origional link) and one from the UK.
No video though. So basically we only have these reports to judge what happened, I would prefer to see it myself, hear the question, his reponse and the way he left the stage.

I mean I think it is totally possible he did this, it seems the proof is well a bit suspect.

cryptorsa1001

posted on Jul, 13 2004 @ 10:56 AM
link

koji K, thanks for post. I have now seen the larger scope of things and admit I must now re-think my position on the subject.

kozmo

posted on Jul, 13 2004 @ 11:04 AM
link

Sorry, but you people are pathetic! Is there nothing else going on in the world of relevance or importance? Perhaps we should all just act like a bunch of third-graders who have forgotten their Ritalin and begin bashing people... like the President. I didn't vote for the man and won't do so this time, but this is a disgrace! And entire thread dedicated to third-grade namecalling and antics? I give the President credit for simply walking away when there is nothing nice to say. Perhaps you all could learn from that!

kozmo

posted on Jul, 13 2004 @ 11:10 AM
link

Originally posted by nanna_of_6

Second, if anyone is responsible for the so called "moral decay" in our country, it is G W Bush & Co.
People wouldn't be so down on the man if he wasn't so corrupted. It's hard to respect Bush when he's done NOTHING AT ALL to help or make things better for the citizens of the USA. He is a throwback from inbreeding .
Respect George W Bush you say, how do you exspect us to respect a man that sends our troops into a country for an oil-war , to ask our troops to lay down their lives for Corperate creed.

George W. Bush is responsible for moral decay? Do you have to fart to breath? Um, wasn't it Clinton having an adulterous affair in the Oval Office and then perjuring himself in front of the entire nation? As far as your claims against GW (And NO I did NOT vote for him), I will await your proof. The economy is growing faster than it has since 1984, by the way.

[edit on 13-7-2004 by kozmo]

nanna_of_6

posted on Jul, 15 2004 @ 04:48 AM
link

Originally posted by cryptorsa1001
I am wondering if any of you slamming Bush finished high school?

To start off with, if it's any of your business,....... I had finished high school and took 1 3/4 years of college, and I can and will say my peice when it comes to the good-for-nothing idiot, George Walker Bush , who in MY opionion is a front-man for that candyxss Cheney who is the one really calling the shots.

I think you were busy doing your sister when brains were passed out?

I am thinking more along the lines of YOU being brainless due to your nasty-gutter-mouth that should not have spouted-off about any member here on this thread .

You all want to slam Bush but have not put forth any credible reasons or arguments for your slanderous tone towards the President.

No credible reason, huh ????? The S.O.B. lied about the WMD's that Saddam supposely had ( which was bullXhit) so he could start a war against Iraq. Because of George Walker Bush, HUNDREDS of our troops have died, THOUSANDS of innocent Iraqi citizens have been murdered/maimed and the Resident Bush still refuses to bring our troops home, and still the S.O.B. will not take responsibility for sending us to war over lies. G W Bush is responsible for every death since his ording us to war,..... no one else.

You want to blame Bush for everything. Have you heard of the Congress or the Senate?

Don't even try to lay any of the blame on anyone else, Bush was going to attack Iraq no matter what anyone else had to say about it,...... Look at the way he treated the UN telling them we would go at it alone if need be, when the lies he and his administratiion tried to tell the UN as a reason to attack Iraq, failed.

Bush has failed at everything he has ever tried to do, .... oh excuse me, at almost everything he has tried to do, the only thing he was ever good at was putting prisoners to death ( as if he was God ), when he was Governor of TX.
As a United States Citizen ( birth right), I have the right to express my opionion of George Walker Bush & Co, and you just got some of my opionion of the THUGS.

koji_K

posted on Jul, 15 2004 @ 04:59 AM
link

Originally posted by kozmo

Sorry, but you people are pathetic! Is there nothing else going on in the world of relevance or importance? Perhaps we should all just act like a bunch of third-graders who have forgotten their Ritalin and begin bashing people... like the President. I didn't vote for the man and won't do so this time, but this is a disgrace! And entire thread dedicated to third-grade namecalling and antics? I give the President credit for simply walking away when there is nothing nice to say. Perhaps you all could learn from that!

i admit this isnt the most important thing in the news of late. however, its of some importance because it goes to the character of the president. do we want a leader who cant answer questions? who feels he's not accountable? these are the issues underlying this superficially trite matter.

-koji K.

nanna_of_6

posted on Jul, 15 2004 @ 12:03 PM
link

Kozmo, Try telling that to the Thousands of people that are out of a job , maybe one of them will beleive that "growth crap", I doubt it, but you can give it a try , I would assume that you work at WalMart, they are about one of the very few that has had any growth. There have been many companies that have closed their doors leaving hard-working people without jobs, " General Mills has announced yesterday that they are closing another plant of theirs, that will make about 5 of their plants closing, if not more, since Bush came into office. I live in the USA where companies are closing up and some of them are taking the work to different countries ( cheaper labor/wages), where do you live , that the jobs are prospering and there is "growth"
.

Why should anyone respect a man that has done nothing but hurt us, in about every way he can.
As far as the Bush/Cheney and their moral-decay, they are the one's that have said " f_ck you" and "f_ck them all" inside the White House. Here's the "url"

edition.cnn.com...

You'll find "part" if not "all" the moral-decay I spoke of in that "url"

[edit on 15-7-2004 by nanna_of_6]