It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Confused123
Hey I find this whole thing very interesting and wonder what my chart would say... Is there anyway you can do a reading for me please?
I was born on November 25, 1993 at 11:43 AM
The location is : 25.73960, -80.21530 which is miami FL
Originally posted by SeaWind
reply to post by LeoVirgo
Hi LeoVirgo, that's very interesting info. As I said before, there are all kinds of experiments ongoing in Astrology. No one knows everything in Astrology -- too broad a field. So if you're working on creating your own Astrology, more power to you.
SeaWind
Originally posted by gemineye
reply to post by Human_Alien
I found that very interesting! My two daughters were born only a day apart (different years), so one would think that they would be much alike, astrologically speaking, but nope. I put in their info and the results were VERY accurate. Thanks for that link... I was quite impressed.
Originally posted by SeaWind
reply to post by LeoVirgo
Hi Leo/Virgo,
I realize "Walter Berg" has written at least one book on the 13 signs zodiac, is there software that supports the 13 signs? Or do you have to do the calculations manually? Do they issue an IAU emphemeris? Is there a website devoted to "Bergian" Astrology?
Ophiuchus as the 13th sign has been around for decades. Ophiuchus as a part of the sign of Scorpio has been around for AGES.
Apparently, you're completely sold on the superiority of using the IAU Zodiac.
ALL types of Astrology use REAL astronomical data in their charts (even Tropical), but the positions are seen thru the framework of twelve 30 degree signs. The signs are symbolic and have MEANING accrued thru observation over a long period of time. The problem with Tropical is that it ignores Precession.
The Tropical Zodiac is aligned with the Vernal Equinox (which determines the Seasons) and is NOT completely worthless, especially for work that depends on the seasonal tides. However, (since I'm a Siderealist) I do NOT consider the Tropical useful for Natal readings.
(I'm posting this on my thread as well.)
SeaWind
Originally posted by LeoVirgo
Originally posted by SeaWind
reply to post by LeoVirgo
Hi Leo/Virgo,
I realize "Walter Berg" has written at least one book on the 13 signs zodiac, is there software that supports the 13 signs? Or do you have to do the calculations manually? Do they issue an IAU emphemeris? Is there a website devoted to "Bergian" Astrology?
Ophiuchus as the 13th sign has been around for decades. Ophiuchus as a part of the sign of Scorpio has been around for AGES.
Apparently, you're completely sold on the superiority of using the IAU Zodiac.
ALL types of Astrology use REAL astronomical data in their charts (even Tropical), but the positions are seen thru the framework of twelve 30 degree signs. The signs are symbolic and have MEANING accrued thru observation over a long period of time. The problem with Tropical is that it ignores Precession.
The Tropical Zodiac is aligned with the Vernal Equinox (which determines the Seasons) and is NOT completely worthless, especially for work that depends on the seasonal tides. However, (since I'm a Siderealist) I do NOT consider the Tropical useful for Natal readings.
(I'm posting this on my thread as well.)
SeaWind
I use astronomy programs to look at the degrees of each constellation as well as the exact position of the spheres in them.
I dont know of Walter Berg. Never heard of Bergian Astrology.
What I use, I have found on my own. Not only the information....but through experience as well.
Im going to leave you to your thread...and appreciate your thoughts you have shared. Im sorry you dont like the idea that someone is walking a path without following what another man has created for them. Even though I kindly, dont agree with giving readings.
We learn through experiences and observation....and that is what I am going by with what I offer to others. I encourage them to also look at experiences and observe the energy of the spheres...not by being told about them by another man...but by stepping out and observing the true sky which is the way astrology began.
edit on 19-1-2011 by LeoVirgo because: (no reason given)
One of the problems in using the IAU zodiac is that the demarcations of the constellations are DIVORCED FROM MEANING
Originally posted by LeoVirgo
reply to post by SeaWind[/
One of the problems in using the IAU zodiac is that the demarcations of the constellations are DIVORCED FROM MEANING
How do you figure? Where do you think the 'meanings' of the 'signs' began? It was not with equal amounts of space in the sky, it was not through having a 'imaginary wheel' that was not reflective to the real sky....it all began with true observation. They surely never ever looked at how Saturn would effect being in Libra...when they saw and observed it in Virgo.
It was much later man 'tied' the signs.
How then does it all work so well? Because there is a link of every sign to all of us. The 'signs' are a part of mankinds collective consciousness...its a part of the past of man. The signs are reflective for the 'path of life'. As I have said...we are of all the signs..but with the practice of reflecting life in the cosmos, we find a harmony between our cosmic prints and our life/purpose. Sometimes we need a little reminder of what we could face or work on, to better ourselves.
Originally posted by korathin
reply to post by SeaWind
lol, srry SeaWind; just amusing in a sad way to see you try and drive the point home that the tropical system is out of whack. Kind of like an out of whack GPS that tells you to turn right, right into a newly constructed building where a road once existed a long, long time ago in a celestial alignment far away.
I am just sad I am technically no longer a Taurus/Ox.... But that is life.
Originally posted by ladyinwaiting
Hm. I looked at the chart, and there are simply too many contradictions to be taken seriously. They even comment to "pick and choose", the traits that fit you. That doesn't work, imho. If I did that, I might end up with say, 50% of characteristics that fit, and 50% that do not.
What does that tell you?
But these contradictions are too profound, and too generalized to fit in anything more than just a serendipitous way. I even had the time of my birth from my birth certificate.
Not to say I don't appreciate the thread. I do.
Originally posted by korathin
reply to post by SeaWind
Hey whats up, if you got time can you draw up a Sidereal Zodiac astrology for me? If not thats cool too.
Location:40°36'6" North, 75°28'38" West (40.601697, -75.477328)-Allentown PA
Time:11:15 AM
Date: 5/10/1985
Cheers
Originally posted by SeaWind
Originally posted by Blarneystoner
I don't deny that there may be some validity to this Astrology stuff but I am extremely skeptical. Reading through the responses to the OP, a question occured to me;
Why are birth times and dates so important to Astrology? To me it would make more sense to base calculations on the time of conception, the moment when two distinct lifeforms merge to create a new and unique individual. Wouldn't the Planetary bodies influence on ourseles be most important at the moment we become the unique lifeforms that each of us are? If the answer to the previous question is "yes" then it also occurs to me that assuming a nine month gestation period would not be a very accurate method.
Not trolling.... serious question.
Thanks
Blarneystoner, assuming you're NOT a troll, you're NOT going to like the answer. You believe that human life begins at conception. I do NOT.
In my belief system, when conception happens, the soul is drawn to the parents, especially the mother, but does NOT actually enter the physical vehicle being formed in the womb.
When the baby is born and draws its first breath, at that time the soul enters the body.
When a person dies, the soul leaves with the body's last breath.
SeaWind
Originally posted by Blarneystoner
Really? Prove it!
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
reply to post by SeaWind
Another example of the logical fallacy of the argument from authority. People tend to hold Newton up on this odd pedestal. Granted, he is one of the greatest scientific minds who ever existed, but he was also oddly obsessed with things that were entirely unscientific. His great works don't justify his entire belief set.
Now, I'll grant that the time of year you were born might have affected your life in some way due to the influence that events revolving around it would have on your life. My birthday is two days before Christmas, I'm sure that had some psychological effect. The problem is that it has nothing to do with the stars and probably had an entirely different effect on someone with an entirely different personality and other life circumstances.