It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by beebs
How did you logically deduce it was a scam?
If it was real he would be selling working generators that do not require fuel, he had enough time to put them in production. He isn't so its a scam.
Originally posted by beebs
Nature is discretely continuous. Its continuity is characterized by discrete behavior.
In the modern definition (from Plato), a sophism is a specious argument used for deceiving someone.
So in other words, there isn't one video you can point to that proves anything?
Originally posted by beebs
If you watch a couple of hours of video on John Searl,
I didn't say anything was impossible, I said extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Searl has none on his website. I watched the video you pointed me too and just saw a motor in pieces, nothing extraordinary. What is it that convinces YOU it's real? So far you've presented nothing definite other than an abstract statement about watching hours and hours of miscellaneous videos. Let's say I do watch hours and hours of Searl videos. What am I supposed to be looking for? We have different world views so something you find convincing I may find quite ordinary. There's nothing extraordinary about the first Searl video you pointed me to.
John Searl is for real. You would have to be an idiot in denial to think that he is a scam artist.
"Nothing is impossible, except that the state of your mind makes it so." - John Searl
Nothing is impossible, except that the state of your mind makes it so
Originally posted by beebs
John Searl is for real.
Originally posted by -PLB-
Originally posted by beebs
How did you logically deduce it was a scam?
Like this:
If it was real he would be selling working generators that do not require fuel, he had enough time to put them in production. He isn't so its a scam.
Originally posted by -PLB-
So you claim that you are objectively looking at Searls work? It is rather arrogant to call yourself objective, don't you think? Or are you trying to say that you yourself are standing in the way of progress?
Originally posted by -PLB-
Note that to me "free" mean it does not require renewable fuel . . .
Originally posted by -PLB-
reply to post by Mary Rose
So you claim that you are objectively looking at Searls work? It is rather arrogant to call yourself objective, don't you think? Or are you trying to say that you yourself are standing in the way of progress? Why would I, or anyone else, not want a new type of "free" energy generator to be real? In fact, I find it a fascinating subject, and I do not exclude it as a possibility. Note that to me "free" mean it does not require renewable fuel, or the fuel is available in abundance (like regular water).
The Searl Effect Generator (SEG), in fact had been previously developed to a point where several prototype SEG generators were made and successfully used. The commercial interest at that time focused specifically on the SEG's transport potential. The original generators were tested and lost in a series of propulsion experiments. Funds were insufficient to continue with the project at that time. However, with global climate changes and a looming energy crisis, it is now imperative that we support the current SEG redevelopment efforts and subsequently, the unmatched transportation potential of the Inverse Gravity Vehicle.
Originally posted by -PLB-
reply to post by shagreen heart
It is when he still asked people to give him money.
The Searl Effect Generator (SEG), in fact had been previously developed to a point where several prototype SEG generators were made and successfully used. The commercial interest at that time focused specifically on the SEG's transport potential. The original generators were tested and lost in a series of propulsion experiments. Funds were insufficient to continue with the project at that time. However, with global climate changes and a looming energy crisis, it is now imperative that we support the current SEG redevelopment efforts and subsequently, the unmatched transportation potential of the Inverse Gravity Vehicle.
Oh damn, the dog ate all the proof it is real.
Originally posted by -PLB-
reply to post by Mary Rose
Incoherent or inconvenient? I think the latter.
As for his generator not using any fuel, what generator?edit on 1-4-2011 by -PLB- because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by -PLB-
As for his generator not using any fuel, what generator?
Making progress and gaining more support everyday.
For over 24 hours of interviews, lectures, pictures, and updated information on Professor John Searl, go through this playlist:
www.youtube.com...
New Article as of September 30th 2010 from Natural News:
www.naturalnews.com...
And also as of September 30 2010, our new website we're working on:
searlmagnetics.com...
And please read this message from Searl Magnetics as of October 14, 2010
In English:
www.scribd.com...
Originally posted by -PLB-
reply to post by shagreen heart
"Yes, the prototype will be ready next month, just like the last 30 years or so. We just need a bit more money, you can really make a difference here you know.".
What components exactly are so expensive? Why with all his experience and knowledge can't he make a prototype from his own money? He even claim he already made several. Are they made of diamonds?
Well its not my money that is lost to this scam. I do assume you put your money in it if you genuinely believe it is real, but you can't say you were not warned.