It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by Phil Jayhan
3.) Some tenants occupied the towers without leases.
For instance, when I moved into my apartment community, you can choose to have no lease, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month, etc. I've seen and know businesses that rent space with no leases.
You don't have to have a lease to rent space. Either way, Sandler O'Neill and Partners occupied the 104th floor of the South Tower, WTC 2:
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/9d7a36cb5822.jpg[/atsimg]
CNN.com
Originally posted by Human_Alien
Originally posted by Phil Jayhan
Originally posted by Leo Strauss
Great work Phil!
Have you looked at the occupancy directly prior to 9/11. Any companies leave just before the attack? I will definitely look closely at this document! Thanks again!!
Thanks Leo!
But you have it backwards. lol
They Twins were pretty much empty and unoccupied until 1997-1998-1999. Check out this chart we made of a cross section from the North Tower.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/0e80ec98a46e.jpg[/atsimg]
World Trade Center Occupancy FOIA 1972-2001 story
Cheers-
Phil
edit on 14-1-2011 by Phil Jayhan because: Added a line of text, and link
Windows on the World is 100% incorrect Phil. I had my wedding reception up there in 1977 (we were the first ones too) so how can it be occupied for the first times in 94 and 99?
I honestly don't know if it was the very top floor or the other one but I am definitely certain it was opened in 1977 so the FOIA is incorrect.
Would you know why that may be?
Thanks and keep up the great work. Love Lets Roll I check it out all the time.
Originally posted by Phil Jayhan
When we saw the windows on the world discrepancy we immediately started looking at all the pictures of WOTW and quickly found pictures which could easily be dated back to the 70's because of dress and hair style. so I know that was an error
Originally posted by Kamatarus
Take a look at columns; 313, 589, 605, 692, 902, 904, 906, 908, 910, 927, 1144 in the FOIA spreadsheet.
Is it weird to take up a lease in a building up to 4 years after it's been annhialated?
Or could it been pre-leased but the lease didnt take effect until the dates posteds?edit on 15-1-2011 by Kamatarus because: cleaned the post
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by Phil Jayhan
You don't have to have a lease to rent space. Either way, Sandler O'Neill and Partners occupied the 104th floor of the South Tower, WTC 2:
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/9d7a36cb5822.jpg[/atsimg]
CNN.com
Notice the tenants list was provided to CNN by CoStar Group:
Costar Group's 650 researchers track billions of square feet of commercial real estate across the United States, including the New York metropolitan area, acting as an electronic information-clearing house for the country's commercial real estate professionals.
I would highly suggest you contact the former WTC Landlord, CoStar Group, and Sandler O'Neill before you start making accusations that everyone is lying and that your FOIA is the only accurate document on the planet.
As with all of your other disinformation "theories", this one has been debunked as well.
Okay Bonez, i've read enough of this thread and your "what if" garbage. Even the informative picture you posted above CLEARLY STATES THAT THEY "LEASED" SPACE. THEREFORE, THEY HAD A "LEASE", wouldnt you agree? Also what is your deal exactly? Do you honestly in your heart believe that everything that happened on 9/11/01 was exactly as they said it happened? That there was no foul play and that the most complex and deadly attack on american soil was plotted by technologically impaired "sand-people" who live in caves and hijacked planes with boxcutters? Lets be realistic. Next week im betting they plan on breaking into fort knox with a spoon right? If some idiot tried to hijack a plane I was on with a boxcutter I would not be the slightest bid afraid of his little sharp piece of metal as I would him getting control of my plane. I would definately attempt to stop it from happening. Something bigger than that is going on. Lets say this... if I took out an insurance policy on my car that safeguarded it from being vandalized by green paint with pink polka dots and 2 weeks later lo and behold my vehicle is green with pink polka dots, would that not be just a TAD suspicious? Go relook everything and stop being a CNN/non-info "debunker" as its super lame having to reply to tell you how stupid your info is. Grow up and open your eyes big guy. Gotta love some sheeple... I mean... people.edit on 1/16/2011 by ZyPHeR because: (no reason given)
If someone here is willing to get this screen-shot of the FOIA request and take out Dave's personal info I will post it ASAP.