It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by beezzer
Originally posted by TheImmaculateD1
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by TheImmaculateD1
One tool I have used in the past is to look and mentally argue the point from the opposing side. It helps define your argument. So you see big government as a plus, as a "friend" to help those who need it, correct?
Sorta like a big brother, huh?
This has nothing to do with Big brother. This has everything to do with keeping the playing field level so that no larger entity takes advantage of a smaller entity.
So you are against the free market system. I mean, keeping the playing field level would have inhibited Gates from cornering the market on Windows, keeping the playing field level would inhibit any company from success.
I get it, you don't want somene to be "better" than someone else.
Tell me, how many trophies did YOU get for "participating"?
Puh-leeze!
perhaps the malpractice insurance companies are gouging their customers....
It takes about four-and-a-half years from the start of a lawsuit to the end, and the average cost to the defense in legal fees was $94,284 in 2004, according to the American Medical Association...
Miami-Dade County, in South Florida, is now the most precarious place for doctors to practice when it comes to lawsuits. In 2007, OB/GYNs paid on average $275,466 annually for malpractice insurance. www.forbes.com...
When capitalism threatens democracy like it has been doing things are required to reshift the balance back to the side of the people.
Regulation keeps people safe and healthy and makes damn sure that a product will do what it is being advertised to do....
Jolley: Five Minutes With John Munsell & A Trip To The Woodshed With The USDA
One day, a long, long time ago, Big John noticed something amiss. Contaminated meat was coming in the back door of his very small plant. “That’s not right,” he thought and called the authorities.
They arrived ready to right a wrong;...
An inspector, armed with many official looking pieces of paper, looked Big John in the eye and said, “Assume the position!”
“Obviously you don’t understand the way we do things around here,” chuckled the inspector who was amused by Big John’s apparent naivety. “We found the bad stuff in your possession; therefore you have to be the bad guy.”
John was frisked again. This time, the authorities included a full body cavity search. It was VERY thorough exam.
“Wait,” protested Big John again. “All this bad stuff came from (deleted), a very large company that might be shipping lots more of that bad stuff to thousands of people. I can prove the bad stuff came from them. PLEASE go after them!”
“No, No, we can’t go after (deleted),” said the now impatient inspectors. “Don’t even say that name. We found the bad stuff here so you must suffer the consequences! We have to protect the public!”
It (the recall of Hallmark/Westland Meat) highlights one of the problems that we have attempted to raise with the agency ever since 1996 when the Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) inspection system was put in place. There seems to be too much reliance on an honor system for the industry to police itself. While the USDA investigation is still on going at Hallmark/Westland, a couple of facts have emerged that point to a system that can be gamed by those who want to break the law. It (HACCP) shifted the responsibility for food safety over to the companies . domesticpolicy.oversight.house.gov...
....Medical liability reform should have been based before Obamacare period. This aspect alone would save 100's of millions.
A 25 minute transport requires me to fill out almost 20 sheets of paper taking about 2 hours. This has to stop. I spent 4 times the amount of time with my paperwork than I do actually caring for my patient.
“...Scott Dalgleish, [was] vice president of manufacturing at Spectra Logic Corp., a Boulder, CO, maker of robotic computer tape backup systems. Dalgleish, an ASQ certified quality manager who has worked in the quality profession since the late 1980s, is not happy with the direction that the quality movement has taken in recent years. And he sees the ISO 9000 family of standards as the primary negative influence.
Among other things, Dalgleish contends that ISO 9000 misdirects resources to an overabundance of paperwork that does almost nothing to make products better, while fostering complacency among top management and quality professionals alike. The recent conversion to the 2000 version of the standard has only made things worse, he says. While ISO 9000:2000 has almost no effect on how good companies operate, it requires huge amounts of time for document revision that could better be spent on real quality improvement, he believes...”
www.qualitymag.com...
Probing the Limits: ISO 9001 Proves Ineffective
www.qualitymag.com...
...”I'm wondering if there might be a silent majority of Quality readers out there on the topic of ISO 9000. The response to my July editorial, "Eliminate ISO 9000?," was the heaviest that we have received in some time. I got lots of e-mails from readers about the piece, which reported the views of Scott Dalgleish, a quality professional who has been publicly critical of the impact of ISO 9000 on manufacturers, and has suggested that companies eliminate ISO 9000 altogether from their quality management systems.
Many of the responses were quite articulate, and some were humorous and entertaining. You can read a sampling in this month's Quality Mailbag department on p. 12.
One thing that struck me about the letters I received is that almost all expressed some level of agreement with Dalgleish, particularly on issues related to excessive ISO 9000 documentation requirements. As you'll see in the Mailbag department, one reader even said that his company has already dropped its ISO 9001 certification with no apparent negative effects.
What surprised me is that the July editorial elicited no ardent rebuttals in defense of ISO 9000...”
www.qualitymag.com...
Let those greedy comapnies go elsewhere and that will allow for a new company who puts people before profits comes in....
Of these failed business, only 10% of them close involuntarily due to bankruptcy and the remaining 90% close because the business was not successful, did not provide the level of income desired or was too much work for their efforts... The failure rate for new businesses seems to be around 70% to 80% in the first year and only about half of those who survive the first year will remain in business the next five years. www.moyak.com...
Wow, time out. I am guessing you are either very young, or very ignorant. Perhaps both.
You clearly have no understanding of the Constitution whatsoever, and should really educate yourself on it before attempting to debate it.
The Constitution in no way guarantees no one should go without.
How one can even come close to taking that away from the Constitution clearly shows a level of ignorance on the topic that is absolutely astounding.
I am forever for any company being allowed to make as much as they want, that is in part what keeps the economy going but at what point does putting profits before people become problem? Since these companies failed to "self regulate' themselves Govt had to step in.
Government's job is to be the big, bad entity that keeps these kinds of companies up at night living in fear. How many more livelyhoods must be destroyed before someone gives a flip about the average American?
As to mental and intellectual proficiency myiq is between 150 - 170 which makes me smarter then roughly 7,5 - 7,9 people out of 10 so that makes what I say as fact. I think about stuff like this all day every day.
When capitalism threatens democracy like it has been doing things are required to reshift the balance back to the side of the people.
Plenty of money is loaned to the government but never enough. Congress needs more money than that. They say not to worry. They go further down the street to the Federal Reserve building. The Fed has been waiting for them, that's one of the reasons it was created. By the time they get inside the Federal Reserve building the officer of the Fed is opening his desk drawer. He knows they're going to be there and he's ready and he pulls out his checkbook and he writes a check to the US Treasury for one billion dollars or whatever the amount is that they need. He signs the check and gives it to the treasury official.
We need to stop here for a minute and ask a question. Where did they get a billion dollars to give to the treasury? who put that money into the account at the Federal Reserve System? The amazing answer is there is no money in the account at the Federal Reserve System. In fact, technically, there isn't even an account, there is only a checkbook. That's all. That billion dollars springs into being at precisely the instant the officer signs that check and that is called "monetizing the debt," that's the phrase they throw at you. That means they just wrote a check, a big rubber check. If you and I were to do that we would go to jail but they can do it because Congress wants them to do it. www.bigeye.com...
According to an article in The New Republic of Dec. 2, 1991, in 1948, a married couple with median income and two children, paid only 2% in state, federal, and Social Security taxes. In 1999, Social Security was 15.3%, plus 2.9% for Medicare, out of the first $62,700 in wages, or $11,411.40, and then perhaps 30% in federal taxes…if you were lucky.... www.gold-eagle.com...
What is capitalism?
Capitalism is a social system based on the recognition of individual rights, including property rights, in which all property is privately owned. Under capitalism the state is separated from economics (production and trade), just like the state is separated from religion. Capitalism is the system of laissez faire. It is the system of political freedom.
The government's job is to protect rights. [NOT take them away] www.capitalism.org...
If that's how America treats it's Vets with Government Socialized medicine....God help the rest of America
This has nothing to do with Big brother. This has everything to do with keeping the playing field level so that no larger entity takes advantage of a smaller entity.
Originally posted by FlyingJadeDragon
Obamacare sure is working great, isn't it? According to an absolutely stunning new poll, 40 percent of all U.S. doctors plan to bail out of the profession over the next three years. Yes, you read the correctly. 4 out of every 10 doctors in America say that they are getting out in the next three years.
Link to article:ww w.thedebtweowe.com
America is already facing a shortage of doctors. Specialists are getting harder to come by due to the high cost of malpractice insurance related to all the frivolous lawsuits and resulting laws which have rendered doctors nearly powerless.
Prepare for things to possibly get even worse courtesy of the new health care bill as doctors may be further ham-strung with even more regulations concerning type,level and cost of care they are allowed to provide.
I wouldn't be surprised if many people in the U.S. health care industry started pulling up stakes and setting up shop in other countries. After all, more Americans are fleeing the country with each passing year. Hundreds give up their passports and hunker down in other countries and they will be needing and wanting more of the special Expatriate hospitals and clinics to get their medical attention from.
Here's another interesting point: Starting this year,the first round of Boomers will begin retiring in waves over the next ten years. This will create an even heavier burden on the already gutted,over-priced and underperforming health care system. With this in mind,this crisis could explode into something that has neither been seen nor planned for yet.
If you've got a Plan B,now might be a good time to get on with it. Also,if you haven't done it yet,you might want to start learning how to perform emergency field medicine. Can't hurt.
edit on 8-1-2011 by FlyingJadeDragon because: wording.edit on 8-1-2011 by FlyingJadeDragon because: wording.