It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Ilovecatbinlady
reply to post by woogleuk
Ok and I removed the large photo as courtesy. Removing anymore would be censorship and an insult to the memory of victims of the zionist state.
The first Arab riots took place in Jerusalem in the intermediary days of Passover (April) 1920. The Jewish community had anticipated the Arab reaction, and was ready to meet it. Jewish affairs in Eretz Israel (Palestine) were then being administered from Jerusalem by the Vaad Hatzirim (Council of Delegates), appointed by the World Zionist Organization (WZO) (which in 1929 became the Jewish Agency). The Vaad Hatzirim charged Ze'ev (Vladimir) Jabotinsky with the task of organizing Jewish self-defence. Jabotinsky was one of the founders of the Jewish battalions which had served in the British Army during the First World War and had participated in the conquest of Palestine from the Turks. Acting under the auspices of the Vaad Hatzirim, Jabotinsky established the Haganah (self-defence) organization in Jerusalem, which succeeded in repelling the Arab attack.
In 1943, it was already clear that the victory of the Allies was only a question of time. The dimensions of the Holocaust were known in Palestine, but the British government adhered to the White Paper policy, and continued to bar the gates of the country to Jewish immigration. Moreover, those immigrant ships which succeeded in escaping from occupied Europe were not only prohibited from entering Palestine, but were sometimes even forced to return to Europe, although the fate that awaited their passengers was clear to all.
The conduct of the British government further infuriated young Jews in Palestine. The Irgun General Headquarters came to the conclusion that the truce it had proclaimed when war broke out had to be ended, and that it was essential to take action against the British without waiting till the war was over.
The Balfour Declaration of 1917; the League of Nations Mandate, which incorporated the Balfour Declaration; the United Nations partition resolution of 1947; Israel's admission to the UN in 1949; the recognition of Israel by most other states; and, most of all, the society created by Israel's people in decades of thriving, dynamic national existence.Jewish independence in the Land of Israel lasted for more than 400 years. Israel first became a nation in 1312 B.C.E., two thousand years before the rise of Islam! Seven hundred and twenty-six years later in 586 B.C.E. these first ancient Jews in the Land of Israel [Judea] were overrun and Israel's First Jewish Temple (on Jerusalem's Old City Temple Mount) was destroyed by Nebuchadnezzar, king of ancient Babylon. Many of the Jews were killed or expelled; however many were allowed to remain. These Jews along with their progeny and other Jews who would resettle over the next 500 years, rebuilt the Nation of Israel and also a Second Temple in Jerusalem upon the Temple Mount.
Originally posted by ScepticalBeliever
reply to post by Whereweheaded
The only problem with your claims about Israel being several thousands of years old is that all of Israels prime ministers have been Ashkenazi Jews, this means that they have absolutely no ancestoral relation to the Israel of old. How can the country's claim for the land be legitimate if their leaders have absolutely relation to the promised land? Also, the argument about Israel existing previously should be worthless anyway. How many countries that are currently established today are under the exact same ethnic rule of 3000+ years ago or? Going by that logic, USA has no right to exist- or at least, large chunks of it don't.
I don't see that you can dispute that Israel hasn't acted the exact same way as Palestine has. I think many today would argue that they're acting wrongfully, just as you say the allies did. As Israelis are quick to point out, even if they are acting wrongfully, this doesn't give Hammas the right to kill innocent civilians- yet Zionist militants used to do the exact same thing- sheer hypocricy.
Also, the main reason for Israels power in the area today is because of their massive stockpile of nuclear weapons, which were produced illegally. The only reason the world found out about this was because of a whistle-blower known as Mordechai Vanunu, after he released photos to The Sunday Times in the UK. As a result of this, he was abducted and after a behind doors trial, sentenced to an 18 year sentence, of which 11 was spent in solitary. I believe he has also been jailed an addition two times for attempting to speak to the foreign media about his mistreatment and also for trying to leave the country.
edit on 3-1-2011 by ScepticalBeliever because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Constantlysilenced
Originally posted by Ilovecatbinlady
reply to post by woogleuk
Ok and I removed the large photo as courtesy. Removing anymore would be censorship and an insult to the memory of victims of the zionist state.
Those are bad pictures. Have a look at them again. This is what you get when you attack convoys and kidnap people. If your beloved Lebanon does it again, I hope the destruction is 100x worse. The state of Israel has every right to exist and I will always support it in it's struggle for survival against it's backwards, cultist neighbours.
An Israeli incursion into Lebanese territory provoked a clash near the border between the two countries, Lebanese State Minister Michel Faroun has said. Three Lebanese soldiers, an Israeli officer and Lebanese journalist were killed in the fighting. Lebanon says troops opened fire after Israeli soldiers entered its territory. Israel denied the charge.
Originally posted by ScepticalBeliever
reply to post by Constantlysilenced
Well, I gave a list of events in my previous post. Obviously some of those mentioned were retaliation, but the specific attacks aimed at the British, in the form of the King David bombing, along with the assassination of the British Minister. The attack on the U.S.S Liberty incident is also a good example, although I realise that is still under dispute, but often that dispute is fueled by bias. Nevertheless, I re-iterate my point- the Israelis condemn Hamas for killing innocent civilians, yet Irgun and various others did the same on several occasions.
Where does retaliation end? I'm sure the Arabs only started the war initially because they felt it was retaliation for stealing their land, then it just escalated completely out of control. At the end of the day, if all we do is constantly seek retaliation, there will be nothing left. The problem is, for many Palestinians now, they have nothing left, so there will be no chance of it ending until they are all dead, it seems. Just to re-iterate, I am not condoning their actions whatsoever, but by Israels non-compromising stance with Palestinians, all they have done is fueled the fire by leaving many men left with nothing other than anger. If the two sides would compromise, then there would be a chance at peace..I know, I'm a dreamer.
Originally posted by Ilovecatbinlady
Originally posted by Constantlysilenced
Originally posted by Ilovecatbinlady
reply to post by woogleuk
Ok and I removed the large photo as courtesy. Removing anymore would be censorship and an insult to the memory of victims of the zionist state.
Those are bad pictures. Have a look at them again. This is what you get when you attack convoys and kidnap people. If your beloved Lebanon does it again, I hope the destruction is 100x worse. The state of Israel has every right to exist and I will always support it in it's struggle for survival against it's backwards, cultist neighbours.
You are a supporter of war crimes and state terrorism. The allegation made by Israel against the Lebanese is untrue.
No Israeli convoy was attacked and two zionist goons who crossed over the border were arrested after Israel trespassed for weeks and Israeli airplane flew over the Lebanon causing sound barrier booms.
Israel is still illegally bounding into Lebanon;
An Israeli incursion into Lebanese territory provoked a clash near the border between the two countries, Lebanese State Minister Michel Faroun has said. Three Lebanese soldiers, an Israeli officer and Lebanese journalist were killed in the fighting. Lebanon says troops opened fire after Israeli soldiers entered its territory. Israel denied the charge.
www.bbc.co.uk...
Israel is both a terrorist and pirate state.edit on 3-1-2011 by Ilovecatbinlady because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Ilovecatbinlady
reply to post by Whereweheaded
Let us not forget that it was Hezbullah that shelled Israel, and started a confrontation. But we don't wanna talk about that now do we? Protecting ones borders is acceptable. Allow me to demonstrate a timeline for ya:
Actually the information you provide is a distortion. The bigger beast in that park is Israel and has been the hostile party for decades. People don't go around tweaking the nose of a bully but you sure as hell dig you heels in when the bully comes a knocking. Hisbullah always retaliates when Israel does something terrible to the people of the Lebanon.
So why are you posting a list with only half the story? Are you some kind of zionist apologist?
Originally posted by ScepticalBeliever
reply to post by Constantlysilenced
I highlighted three. You can also add the Lavon Affair to that, as well. Again, I will say, just because you're retaliating, it does not give you the right to kill innocent civilians. Also, you will notice I never said Israel was a war hungry nation in the first place- I said they were hypocritical for their condemnation of Hamas and various other Palestinian terrorist groups. You will see in this thread I have given various examples of Zionist militants terrorist actions and how Israel have, on occasion, actually gone on to celebrate and reward these actions. I have also stated that 3 of the leaders of said organisations, in the past, have later gone on to become the prime minister- thus highlighting more hypocrisy, in relation to condemnation of Arabic terrorist groups.edit on 3-1-2011 by ScepticalBeliever because: (no reason given)
Israel would lay waste to that entire region.. Some of you will bring up the last lebanon war... Don't use that as a template. That war was fought with gloves... They were worried about public opinion...