Quake Watch 2011

I highly suggest keeping an eye on HAARP's induction magnometer, found on their website. A possible correlation between ultra low/extremely low frequency transmissions from the facility and the quakes could predict future quakes.

reply to post by Robin Marks


I didn't know Dali ate for free!! Imagine what those napkins must be worth now. If I could figure out how to correctly post my avatar you'd be able to see the whole thing!

On topic, from watching you and Puterman's conversations I had a bad feeling that this might be the foreshock but had hoped not. I've watched your thread on the New Madrid and I must say I'm a little concerned right now. Thank you for all your insight. You, Puterman, WestCoast, True American and Muzzy should be compensated for the knowledge and footwork you guys put in to these earthquake threads.

Thank you by the way for the explanation as to why we're not seeing multiple aftershocks

reply to post by angelchemuel


I have no idea what he is talking about. What is meant by last 10 minutes? The shaking? No , the signature? What is the problem with that? The length it 'lasts' depends on how far the instrument is from the event to some degree,

Take a look at any LISS recorder. Signatures can go across hour boundaries.

Ignore it. Sounds like pratt talking.

reply to post by 200457


I look at the magnetometer almost daily. It measures magnetism, the magnetic field in other words. It has absolutely positively naff all to do with the HIGH FREQUENCY auroral array and anyway ELF waves are radio. If radio could make anything vibrate or resonate we would all be dancing a jig every minute of the day with the radio frequencies around us. Read the thread.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

When you have read that, then come back. If you still think that is the case then please explain it in simple terms so I can understand it.

reply to post by angelchemuel


odds of 1 in 22,727.
don'y fancy those odds.
I'm glad we decided agaisnt nuclear power back in the 70's.
what kin of crazyiness is behind building nuclear power plants on an earthquake faultline

reply to post by PuterMan


oh yeah, I remeber that now, caused my GE to go real slow, I had it on My Places, but I took it off.
Thanks I'l put that somewhere handier for next time.

reply to post by megabogie


[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/54072874b213.png[/atsimg]

How about that?

I am sure we need no other compensation than that people appreciate our efforts and learn something.

Any guess on how big this new one is coming in to virgina? 300 mic/sec on gee us.cbn

reply to post by PuterMan


Thank you Puterman! I'm gonna try to switch it right now! If we could find an alchemist to turn our gratitude into gold you'd be a very wealthy man.

reply to post by steve95988


Small?

CBN.US.00.BHZ.2011.236

by comparison to

CBN.US.00.BHZ.2011.235

ETA: Mm, 4.2 eh? Did I misread the scales?

Magnitude
4.2
Date-Time
Wednesday, August 24, 2011 at 00:04:36 UTC
Tuesday, August 23, 2011 at 08:04:36 PM at epicenter
Location
37.917°N, 77.891°W
Depth
7.8 km (4.8 miles) (poorly constrained)
Region
VIRGINIA
Distances
52 km (32 miles) ESE of Charlottesville, Virginia
54 km (33 miles) SW of Fredericksburg, Virginia
55 km (34 miles) NW of RICHMOND, Virginia
81 km (50 miles) NNE of Farmville, Virginia
Location Uncertainty
horizontal +/- 10.1 km (6.3 miles); depth +/- 9.4 km (5.8 miles)
Parameters
NST= 82, Nph= 96, Dmin=55.7 km, Rmss=1.24 sec, Gp=126°,
M-type="Nuttli" surface wave magnitude (mbLg), Version=4
Source
Magnitude: USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)
Location: USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)
Event ID
usc0005iu6

reply to post by PuterMan
[mo
Am I Crazy , or is it Kinda ODD to you too that an Eathquake just " Happens " to Hit the East Coast of the United States of America during these Trying Times . A Co Winky Ding Maybe ? .....Hmm.........

reply to post by berkeleygal


This one is a tad SE of the 5.9. Any guesses, is this an aftershock or a separate event?

earthquake.usgs.gov...

reply to post by berkeleygal


OK, if that was a 4.2 and the other was a 5.8 take a look at these which I have ensured are the same vertical scales (the others were by the way more or less)

www.iris.washington.edu...
www.iris.washington.edu...

I have seen bigger 2.5 traces in Arkansas than that second one.

Any ideas anyone?

ETA: Just as a comparison here is the Colorado 5.3 at the same scale

www.iris.edu...

Not much difference in distance of station so should be a reasonable comparison.

reply to post by PuterMan


NADA. Other than...WHAT???

I kept refreshing that page for the second quake, thinking it must still be loading. I mean..yah, it is deeper...but come on!

Either:

A. The first quake was a WHOLE heck of a lot bigger than they are saying
B. The second quake is smaller (which it isn't.I posted a pic of it from GEE and it looked to be around a 4.5)
C. These are NOT typical quakes that we are seeing
D. The second quake is going to be re-figured and placed at a different location....

I don't know. I am sure there are many other options, but CLEARLY something is off here. We (several here) have been saying this now since the Colorado quake and I think we are only getting louder.

I tell ya....something is smelling like rotten eggs.

ETA: Here is the screen shot I took of it just a bit ago....along with another quake in Colorado. I'm telling you, they are having a lot of 'echos' to each other. It's downright eerie.

reply to post by westcoast


Just added Colorado at same scale

Something does not look right!

Cape Breton Nova Scotia here

NOTHING

reply to post by BobAthome


Cause getting reports from vaguelly "all over the country"
so where you from anything yes?
no?

just do qick

Cape Breton
no

The 5.8 showed at 17.37 mm/s at US.CBN:



That's MM/S, not MICRONS/SEC

So I don't see how 400 microns/sec translates into a 4.2, when the epicenter was even closer to the station!

Darn straight something isn't right. When I saw it, I guessed around 2.5 to 3- but 4.2?

:shk:

usgs is a mess,
and last time i checked

Full-screen
Earthquake
Country: Portugal
State:
Location: Facho
Date: 2011-08-23 : 18:06:32
Magnitude: 3.1
Depth: 1 km

portugal
wasnt in the middle of the atlantic

and that rift is heading my way