It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Yes, yes... we know... but exposure was minimal.
According to whom?
Let me guess.... According to NASA?
According to the same agency that I am saying falsified the moon landings?
This is circular reasoning.
You are essentially saying that NASA went to the moon because NASA said so.
earth's gravity of 9.8m/S^2 / 6 = 1.6m/S^2 on the moon
So for the dust to fall from a height of 3m would take roughly 1.9 seconds with no air to carry off the finer stuff. Note how it all comes back to the surface within about 2 seconds max regardless of particle size (no I didn't get a chance to use a micrometer on it )
Originally posted by Josephus23
The laser range finders are of no consequence because THE ENTIRE MOON IS REFLECTIVE.
The exact nature of the scientific method, and the anomalies on the moon do not add up.
Oh and about those "moon rocks"...
The astronauts from the Apollo missions gave the Dutch Museum of natural history a "moon rock" from the missions as an act of goodwill and the rock was actually a piece of petrified wood.
The museum acquired the rock after the death of former prime minister Willem Dreesman in 1988.
Dreesman received it as a private gift in 1969 from then-U.S. ambassador J. William Middendorf who accompanied the Apollo 11 astronauts on a visit to The Netherlands after the first moon landing.
Mr Middendorf told how the rock came from the U.S. State Department, but couldn't recall the exact details.
'Apparently no one thought to doubt it, since it came from the prime minister's collection,' Ms Van Gelder said.
The very slight atmosphere caused mostly by radioactive decay combined with the gravity of the moon being 1/6th that of the earth would have made the particles BEHIND the moon lander stay aloft much longer than they were seen to do so.
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by Pilgrum
earth's gravity of 9.8m/S^2 / 6 = 1.6m/S^2 on the moon
So for the dust to fall from a height of 3m would take roughly 1.9 seconds with no air to carry off the finer stuff. Note how it all comes back to the surface within about 2 seconds max regardless of particle size (no I didn't get a chance to use a micrometer on it )
Note the 1.6m/s/s is acceleration, not velocity..
So you would expect an item on the moon would take 2 seconds to fall the first 1.6 meters...
Given it started with zero velocity...
AND, as (I think) has been pointed out, the gravitational field on the Moon is strong enough so that things will fall, in much the same way they appear to you on Earth....they accelerate slower, of course....but it is hard to detect merely by looking at it...you need accurate time measurements....
1/6th gravity. Think about it. It ISN'T "1/600th" gravity.....
Something that takes 1 second to fall on earth should take 6 seconds on the moon...
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by backinblack
You really think this? Then, you don't understand the physics of acceleration due to gravity!!!:
Something that takes 1 second to fall on earth should take 6 seconds on the moon...
NO, it is incorrect to allege that statement above. Crack open a physics textbook, or research any number of physics tutorials online.
You concept of how gravity would work in 1/6th that of the earth is slightly flawed.
The further away that a body moves away from the moon, the more mass comes into play.
Originally posted by fisheye
reply to post by Upyerheart
I am in agreement with you. The dust should disperse into the air in a slow moving cloud like dust partials hitting water. I think the video was slowed down to give the illusion of low gravity.
Bare with me
Just watched some footage of the moon buggy driving along, and something jumped out at me. If there is low gravity on the moon, when the off-road type tyres dig into the rocky surface and they throw the rocks/stones into the air, wouldn't they float back down slowly rather than immediately like in our gravitation?
Or am I being completely stupid?
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by Pilgrum
earth's gravity of 9.8m/S^2 / 6 = 1.6m/S^2 on the moon
So for the dust to fall from a height of 3m would take roughly 1.9 seconds with no air to carry off the finer stuff. Note how it all comes back to the surface within about 2 seconds max regardless of particle size (no I didn't get a chance to use a micrometer on it )
Note the 1.6m/s/s is acceleration, not velocity..
So you would expect an item on the moon would take 2 seconds to fall the first 1.6 meters...
Given it started with zero velocity...