It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by wcitizen
Originally posted by skeptic_al
Originally posted by wcitizen
Excellent. I was surprised when I saw the same kind of smoke being created.
The debunkers are always asking for proof....well, now they've got some!edit on 19-12-2010 by wcitizen because: (no reason given)
I'd even spot ypu a "Plausible" that the fire stream was thermite.
And that alone calls into question the 'investigation' into 9/11, and merits a new investigation.
Debunkers seem to take the position that 9/11 truthers must be able to explain everything and come up with the exact scenario of exactly what they believe happened. This is a false position because that is the job of a proper investigation. The 'evidence' in the OS has serious flaws. That is enough to warrant a second, proper investigation.
If I knew somebody was going to Kill somebody and could prevent it, am I guilty for not stopping it?
Originally posted by skeptic_al
reply to post by backinblack
The Laws regarding the Military shooting down terrorists was changed prior to september, and the order had to come from the White House. So the Norad or the Military would have been following Orders and therefore not accountable.
Just like Area51, where the Military contracts out the Killing of Civilians by Any Means possible in order to protect the secrets. The Military can not be used to harm US Civilians, so they get some body else to do it for them. Brilliant, cause the Government achieves the result but has not broken any Laws.
Originally posted by skeptic_al
reply to post by backinblack
The Laws regarding the Military shooting down terrorists was changed prior to september, and the order had to come from the White House. So the Norad or the Military would have been following Orders and therefore not accountable.
Just like Area51, where the Military contracts out the Killing of Civilians by Any Means possible in order to protect the secrets. The Military can not be used to harm US Civilians, so they get some body else to do it for them. Brilliant, cause the Government achieves the result but has not broken any Laws.
Originally posted by loveguy
Originally posted by skeptic_al
reply to post by backinblack
The Laws regarding the Military shooting down terrorists was changed prior to september, and the order had to come from the White House. So the Norad or the Military would have been following Orders and therefore not accountable.
Just like Area51, where the Military contracts out the Killing of Civilians by Any Means possible in order to protect the secrets. The Military can not be used to harm US Civilians, so they get some body else to do it for them. Brilliant, cause the Government achieves the result but has not broken any Laws.
Cheney with the order to stand down?
Mossad?
No laws broken?
Brilliant! Our leaders are incompetent in protecting us from foreigners, but they'll hire out-side forces to do their dirty work on the inside, to protect secrets...
Has anyone ever told you that you lack moral fiber?
Originally posted by buddhasystemd) there is no way you can ensure that thermate burns synchronously as to ensure an instantaneous and uniform collapse. Just consider the time scale. High explosives can be synchronized, but continuous burning of a substance sticking to vertical columns... I think not.
Originally posted by turbofan
Originally posted by buddhasystemd) there is no way you can ensure that thermate burns synchronously as to ensure an instantaneous and uniform collapse. Just consider the time scale. High explosives can be synchronized, but continuous burning of a substance sticking to vertical columns... I think not.
Yes there is:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by buddhasystem
It's a good thread and I did like the OP. However, I would like to present a few comments:
a) sometimes, superficial similarity is just that. When watching some of the thermate test videos, one cannot help but notice some similarity to a volcano eruption -- violent ejection of hot material and "lava" flow. Really, at the level of discussion here, and assuming we knew little about volcanoes, one could surmise that a volcano is a huge slab of steel, upon which some mythical giants put a huge bucket full of thermate and set it on fire. Look, there is lava! Molten rocks!
b) it's not possible to guide an airplane within inches of planted thermate. The videos show the alleged flow of molten metal in the vicinity of impact point, not 20 stories up or down.
c) flows of metal in 9/11 videos could be anything, like melting siding of the building (sheet metal)
d) there is no way you can ensure that thermate burns synchronously as to ensure an instantaneous and uniform collapse. Just consider the time scale. High explosives can be synchronized, but continuous burning of a substance sticking to vertical columns... I think not.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
b) it's not possible to guide an airplane within inches of planted thermate. The videos show the alleged flow of molten metal in the vicinity of impact point, not 20 stories up or down.