It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by kalisdad
Originally posted by Phenomium
A beard is hardly a comparison to a woman's breast. The better question what would happen is we showed half of our "SEXUAL" attribute at a workplace? Yeah, we would get into big trouble. I personally, dont want to,....but then this begs the question, why would a woman want to show her sexual attributes in public?
actually I consider it a damn good comparison
how many posters have stated that the breasts are not a sex part of the body? neither is a beard
both are part of the human body that are considered in a professional dress code
me not being able to have a full trimmed and well maintained beard is no different than a woman being asked to cover her cleavage in the workplace
its part of a company's dress code and as an employee you are expected to comply with this or find another place of employment
edit on 17-12-2010 by kalisdad because: formating
Originally posted by SolarE-Souljah
I'm pretty sure at this point, we know where the majority stands on this issue:
Cleavage is not professional.
Originally posted by Phenomium
As I previously posted in my statement above, who cares what women think about whether their breast is a sexual part of their body or "mother nature's milk jugs for babies"? It's the man that determines if they are a sexual body part or not ....unless the woman is trying to impress other women. I would support my theory with an internet full of porn that says different......that indeed a woman's breast IS a sexual object TO MEN. Porn is the number one money maker on the whole internet by far and women's breast are a major part of that pecuniary influx. Women may say one thing....but reality to a man is much clearer to the rest of the world. i could say the same about my (well, you know...I don't care to get banned on here with details), my point is, I could say that because my seed, created the baby...that it is not a sexual object and is a beautiful part of natures grand plan for life and existence. We men and women know that is a load of crap though. Just because something is rationalized by a person so that they can benefit and reap the rewards fro it.......doesn't make it (in and of itself) just a one-sided sword the sexual body parts of men and women serve two purposes....fun AND procreation. Men have always been turned on by breast and some men desire nothing but the breast, so don't tell me that they are not a sexually arousing part of the male and female unity. Even a child of 9 years and above can tell you that simply by the way men act around women with low cut tops. I can't even believe you just tried to convince me of that. have you ever had relations with a woman at all? Did she complain because maybe you forgot to show attention to some part of her?
Originally posted by hotbakedtater
reply to post by Phenomium
I am a woman, and owner of two breats. Only *I* decide whether they are sexual playthings at the moment or merely two massive blobs sitting on my chest. No man can decide that. How does a man decide if breats are sexual or not?
....just like a hairy fat man has the decency not to dangle his ass in front of your face
Originally posted by hotbakedtater
reply to post by Dark Ghost
Cleavage is not sexual, breasts are not sexual, it is all in the mind of the person sexualizing them.
Originally posted by hotbakedtater
reply to post by Phenomium
I am a woman, and owner of two breats. Only *I* decide whether they are sexual playthings at the moment or merely two massive blobs sitting on my chest. No man can decide that. How does a man decide if breats are sexual or not?
Originally posted by harrytuttle
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/33d40b1c6afe.jpg[/atsimg]