It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I wish I could travel Canada, I dream this all the time, but all I can do now is work hard to obtain my political science degree while coming up with the cash to afford a couch to sleep on and some canned food to eat. I can only hope that my country does not shoot itself in the foot some more for the next three years.
Originally posted by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
NAFTA opened up the gates to the US taking over our TV industry. We have what now, 10% Canadian content in the Canadian media (at best)?
Originally posted by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
You think we are smelly hippies? And we think people to the East are greedy politicians. This is the common misperception of Canadians who live in such a large and diverse country, but who will only experience so much of it and not the whole.
Originally posted by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
That's just a stereotype. I'm not saying Canadian stereotypes are uncommon though, in fact they have way too much influence among peoples' perception of this country.
Originally posted by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
I did not necessarily say you did agree with it. However, I disagree with your view that we cannot do anything about it, because we can and will. The only reason why I am still in this country is because I have hope for a brighter Canadian future than the country that it is now, ransacked by greedy and out-of-touch pro-American politicians.
Originally posted by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
"Those who ignore history, tend to repeat it". There is a reason why Canadian history is important for Canadians to learn and understand. To say that it means nothing is wrong, it has shaped us and we have a duty to maintain the virtues that our country was founded on. If we just sit back and allow the US to hijack us, then we have lost everything, and we are no longer Canada.
Foreign Affairs Minister Lawrence Cannon and U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton suggested Monday that the sweeping new deal is merely about ensuring the status quo in the face of security fears that bog down traffic across the border.
“We are very conscious of the stakes . . . We want this to enhance not just security but trade and commercial activity, business connections, people-to-people travel, recreation, tourism,” Clinton said.
“We are, I think, committed to discussing and arriving at conclusions about how best to deal with the environment in which we find ourselves today,” she said.
The two nations are reportedly in talks about a proposed pact that would give Washington a much bigger say in Canada’s border security, immigration controls and information-sharing with American law-enforcement agencies.
“Beyond the Border: A Shared Vision for Perimeter Security and Competitiveness” is the title of the tentative deal, which carries the subtitle: “A Declaration by the President of the United States of America and the Prime Minister of Canada.”
www.thestar.com...
Originally posted by masqua
A prophecy of American government forces like the TSA, Homeland Security, Coast Guard and assorted (I fear this is the real reason) US military forces and permanent bases on Canadian soil.
Originally posted by loagun
However look at all the sh*t happening in the world, and we all know the big WW3 is teetering soon. Just let the USA watch over our boarders too, they have better military weaponry anyways. It would also mean we get to have better security technology as well.
You have to be realistic, and accept it happens , and always has all over the world except we aren't being taken over with brute force and murdered at the same time. We are also not going to take on the title of the 51st state, or 'USA North', and just abandon our laws, and sovereignty, and throw it all out the window next year, or even the next.
i wonder if our wedding is going to be as big as William and Kate's
That’s not the direction the U.S. is going. Ms. Clinton, Mr. Jacobson’s boss at the U.S. State Department, has talked of efforts to “harden the border” between Canada and the U.S.
Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano has similarly expressed a desire for “a real border” between the two countries and ensuring that Canada and Mexico are treated equally when it comes to security.
Ms. Clinton and Ms. Napolitano’s actions speak even more convincingly of their true intentions. Heavier security and more intrusive red tape have conspired to make the border a lot stickier this decade – a trend that has accelerated during the Obama administration.
www.theglobeandmail.com...
The sheer weight of this heightened security has overwhelmed a handful of isolated pilot projects dedicated to co-operative security, such as the joint RCMP-U.S. Coast Guard efforts to patrol the waters off the B.C. coast during the Olympics.
Bob Rae thinks he’s figured out the Conservative’s strategy about a proposed North American perimeter arrangement with the United States: Play it down until it’s all signed, sealed and delivered and then spring it on Canadians.
“The Cons don’t want anyone talking about this until the deal is done,” the Liberal foreign affairs critic told The Globe this weekend. “There would appear to be a draft agreement, and a roll-out plan.”
www.theglobeandmail.com...
“We intend to pursue a perimeter approach to security, working together within, at and away from the borders of our two countries in a way that supports economic competitiveness, job creation and prosperity, and in a partnership to enhance our security and accelerate the legitimate flow of people and goods between our two countries,” says part of the draft proposal obtained by The Globe and Mail’s Steven Chase.
“They figure they’ve only got three more Question Periods [the House is to rise Friday for the Christmas break but MPs could leave as early as Wednesday] before they leave for six weeks … so there will be more of these bromides for the next three days,” the Liberal MP told The Globe.
It would also include a closer working relationship for the Canadian and U.S. militaries in emergencies, building on a 2008 agreement that sets out rules for how each country can call for the other’s assistance.
The Draft Proposal
Originally posted by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
You have to be realistic, and accept it happens , and always has all over the world except we aren't being taken over with brute force and murdered at the same time. We are also not going to take on the title of the 51st state, or 'USA North', and just abandon our laws, and sovereignty, and throw it all out the window next year, or even the next.
i wonder if our wedding is going to be as big as William and Kate's
Hypocrite. I am as real as it gets, and I don't give a damn about any of the royals except the Queen, because she is our supreme authority.
You want to compare Canada to an old woman? She is not old, she is young and beautiful and shines bright in a world of violence and corruption. The US rapes Canada by taking her money, her jobs, her security, and now you think Canada should marry the US and let it be?
What you speak is blind treason. You can love being a little American drone all that you want. When the Americans come to assume control over my homeland, I will be out there alongside my people, armed to the teeth. I will fight and die for my country and for all of my Canadian ancestors that have fought and died against American annexation for hundreds of years.
To live is to fight. To give up and surrender is to die and become a puppet to the American empire. As the saying goes, "better to die on your feet than live on your knees".edit on 14-12-2010 by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by masqua
It's beginning to look like it's only the Harper government that's primarily behind this initiative
But press leaks indicate that the aim is to fully integrate Canadian and U.S. border enforcement..