Open Letter to Assange: Release the Prophecy of August, 1979

reply to post by Michael Cecil


WHat chew talking bout willis.

I smell crap. Care to elaborate instead of spewing garbage. I'm off this thread in t minus 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3,2,1.

Nope no zoopstar for you.

get the point..

You got nadda but hype.

Show me the money....

well, that's too bad. maybe drop the sword and show off a nice pic with you and handbags or new shoes?


back on topic.

can the OP post here his material?

Originally posted by gandhi
reply to post by Michael Cecil
So because one specific person wont release what you sent him, your going to let the world suffer the consequences?

No.

The number is probably in excess of 10,000 religious 'authorities' and media officials in the United States and the Israel who have been censoring and suppressing this particular Prophecy; any one of whom could change their thoughts about censoring this Prophecy at any moment.

Contact the Jewish Voice for Peace.

Ask THEM what the Prophecy is.

Mi cha el

reply to post by InertiaZero


LOL..great post..and I was going to ask if Mr Ewok lived in a cave, myself.

But, picturing Julian thinking this just made me really LOL..sighs..sometimes these threads really make my day

reply to post by gandhi






I smell BS.... I hate when ...I knopw I hate to use hate... But I hate when people come on and say stuff like that..

I have a secret...

reply to post by Michael Cecil


Do you have a link for your prophecy..or have it handy, i.e show a copy of it here..I mean..what good does it do to come here, and make a post of a letter to Juilian A.? I told you Id release it, what difference does it make WHO releases it!


Mr. Ewok, shoes and a handbag are delightful if this were a fashion site. I do have pictures like that..not fitting for a conspiracy site..

reply to post by Michael Cecil


Michael are you talking about World war 3? Any clues would be helpful.

No ridicule i am genuinely interested in this 1979 prophecy, it was the year of my birth!

Please provide some more information. You come across as very well spoken and i sense an urgency in your posts?

Anything to do with Zechariah 14:4?

im surpsied your girl arms can hold up that sword.


OP, if you post your document on here and it was genuine and detailed,it would cause a stir. why not?

Originally posted by Yummy Freelunch
... shoes and a handbag are delightful if this were a fashion site. I do have pictures like that..not fitting for a conspiracy site..

That all depends on what you have in the handbag, doesn't it?
I move for handbag transparency! Who knows what "yummy" things might be hidden in there...

reply to post by ewokdisco




AHe will not and I went to the site in question and the only thing that came up was the peace accord between Pal and Isreal

Originally posted by Yummy Freelunch If you send me the prophecy, I will release it here. Please dont keep us in suspense.

I am not keeping you in suspense.

Some 10,000 people are keeping you in suspense.

Contact the Jewish Voice for Peace in Oakland, California, as I recall.

This is no longer my responsibility.

How many people read ATS?

The Prophecy was not intended for the people of ATS, believe it or not.

It was intended for this civilization.

OR NOT.

This is out of my hands.

Mi cha el

the sun newspaper today had a wikileaks article about UFO papers this article was under a google earth moon base article.

reply to post by Michael Cecil


Why don't you release the documents yourself, why do you want to free-ride on the attention Wikileaks is getting ? If your document is important and also true i am pretty sure people will give it the attention it deserves.

Besides, what's the purpose of going through a secure site, since you are writing here it kind of contradicts the sole purpose of a secure whistleblowing site like wikileaks.

This is insulting. All of your posts are like this.
Stop pretending that you have a secret and leading people on with this nonsense.
It's like you carry around a pretty box and describe the wonderful things within, but no one is ever allowed to see it.
Rubbish! The only thing you have is the curiosity of the gullible and the annoyance of everyone else.
You, Sir, have no credibility.

What does your bible say about false prophets? I don't think God likes them. It seems he has a special place just for them in the afterlife.

[snip]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It's too bad the document is no longer your problem.
Why didnt you just email Julian's site yourself...why post on ATS at all?

I know, when you bring it to base level logic...it sounds a little silly, huh?

Originally posted by Yummy Freelunch Do you have a link for your prophecy...

A link to the Prophecy?

Are you serious?

It was typed with a typewriter--ever used one of those?--in 1979.

I can't even give you a link to the note I wrote on my website entitled "Context of the Prophecy, August 1979" because my entire website has been termed a "hate speech" website by a 'standing-in-for-God-Himself' moderator of ATS.

Mi cha el

[snip]



i say the OP should post his document and let us read it? i am sure we would all be open minded [ha]. and why would wikileaks not use it? was it just theory? was there any proof?

Its called a scanner...you know...scan the document..post to website and voila its on the interwebs. I do agree with alot of people who are posting in this thread that untill YOU can come up with something to show then its nothing but hogwash!

Here, mate. I'm not saying you don't have a credible request towards Julian Assange, but the man's line of thinking is somewhere along these lines.

Asked if he has ever been forwarded documents dealing with UFOs or extraterrestrials, Assange responded, "Many weirdos e-mail us about UFOs or how they discovered that they were the anti-Christ whilst talking with their ex-wife at a garden party over a pot plant. However, as yet they have not satisfied two of our publishing rules: 1) that the documents not be self-authored; 2) that they be original.

www.msnbc.msn.com...

Is there an outside chance that this may be where their organization is categorizing your request?

Just my opinion.

Mod Edit: No Quote/Plagiarism – Please Review This Link.