Wikileaks Exposed - The man behind the NWO Curtain

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by MrXYZ
How daaaaare he give $100mil to human rights causes...what an eviiiiiiiil man, right?

he's not giving $100M to human rights groups
as a gesture of good will.

Did u not read Soros agenda on how to bring down
governments I posted a few pages back? His rule #1 was

bring in funds disguised as humanitarian aid.

and yes he is evil.

Check out which governments he helped to PEACEFULLY overthrow!! They were all communist countries with a horrible human rights record! How the hell you can accuse him of doing something great like that is beyond me.

Wanna know which countries are against him and why? Turkmenistan and Khazakstan...because he tried to promote democracy over there...they didn't like that given their relatively oppressive regimes. He's doing the very thing the US has been trying to do for decades according to their motto...spread democracy. He's not doing it with arms though.

Originally posted by MrXYZ
Also, you get -10 points for focusing on the messenger and packaging once again instead of the actual CONTENT of the message...just like you focus on Assange and Wikileaks instead of the content of the cables. You're too blind too even look at facts...all you want is being spoon fed propaganda without ever looking at the evidence.

If Satan shows up on my front porch
with a bag full of money. Am I still
supposed to listen to his sales pitch
already knowing he is Satan ????

Absolutely not !!!!

but according to you I should just
look at the money, not who brings it.

Same goes here. If the guys works for
and gets paid by Soros funding, then
nothing he says interest me.

And for the record, I am NOT a young turks fan.

Originally posted by MrXYZ
Check out which governments he helped to PEACEFULLY overthrow!! They were all communist countries with a horrible human rights record! How the hell you can accuse him of doing something great like that is beyond me.

Wanna know which countries are against him and why? Turkmenistan and Khazakstan...because he tried to promote democracy over there...they didn't like that given their relatively oppressive regimes. He's doing the very thing the US has been trying to do for decades according to their motto...spread democracy. He's not doing it with arms though.

and the point u seem to be missing is
that new regime that replaced the old one
is now a puppet regime loyal to Soros
(not to democracy). People will obey you
if you fill their bellies. You buy their loyalty
with aid.

Have u taken a look at the Ivory Coast lately ???

And can you please tell me in what country
in the world is it LEGAL to overthrow a government???

reply to post by boondock-saint


Apparently in the US, because they do it all the figgin' time!!!

LOL @ you for blaming Soros for the last leader at the Ivory Coast not accepting defeat during the last democratic elections

Originally posted by MrXYZ
Apparently in the US, because they do it all the figgin' time!!!

LOL @ you for blaming Soros for the last leader at the Ivory Coast not accepting defeat during the last democratic elections

and do you really believe the CIA or Soros had
nothing to do with that election ?????

almost every election in the world, the CIA
has their hands involved. Iraq figured this out
and wants the US gone. Karzai is also a CIA
puppet. And let's not forget Iran
Do you think Ivory Coast is any different?
me thinks not

Lol ,this thread is still going after debunked here www.abovetopsecret.com...

And boondock fail to admit his mistake derail his own thread with CIA running the all world elections bs and other bla bla

This thread should be transfered in HOAX es

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by MrXYZ
Apparently in the US, because they do it all the figgin' time!!!

LOL @ you for blaming Soros for the last leader at the Ivory Coast not accepting defeat during the last democratic elections

and do you really believe the CIA or Soros had
nothing to do with that election ?????

almost every election in the world, the CIA
has their hands involved. Iraq figured this out
and wants the US gone. Karzai is also a CIA
puppet. And let's not forget Iran

Do you think Ivory Coast is any different?
me thinks not

Oh, so now Soros has connections to the CIA too...of coooooourse. Last I checked he does halo jumps for them in Iran and secretly infiltrates their nuclear power facilities...and in his spare time they let him secretly execute enemies in Afghanistan.



There were UN people and other international observers in the Ivory Coast and they said the elections were legit and the opposition of the current president won. That guy obviously doesn't agree...not the first time in Africa. What's next? Wanna blame Soros for every single civil unrest in Africa?

Originally posted by xavi1000
Lol ,this thread is still going after debunked here www.abovetopsecret.com...

And boondock fail to admit his mistake derail his own thread with CIA running the all world elections bs and other bla bla

This thread should be transfered in HOAX es

Of course it has...theCinic is shouting blatant lies like a parrot, and Boon attacks a dude who donated billions to humanitarian causes and the peaceful removal of communist regimes. I feel a bit as if I'm talking to that loon Beck in here

reply to post by thecinic


[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/662bdcc23a13.jpg[/atsimg]

How about you back up your claims with FACTS and EVIDENCE for a change. And how about not ignoring posts that totally debunk your hilarious drivel?

Originally posted by SkurkNilsen
post removed by staff

All I'm getting is "Soros is evil".

When you ask why, they list a ton of projects he funded...which is hilarious given that every single one of those projects was to fight communism, spread democracy, or fight for humanitarian causes

reply to post by SkurkNilsen


I think I have given up asking for any answers to be honest.

I just feel some sort of duty almost to stand up against ignorant drivel when I see it. Not that we need bother, some posters destroy their own evidence and credibility even as they type.

ETA: I only originally posted because boon asked for some info I actually had. It obviously didnt fit his lies so I was labelled CIA immediately. I'm pretty sure he didnt even have time to read it.

mods, can I get a lil help here
there are rules about multiple
user accounts ganging up
on a thread.

there are also rules about
name calling which BOTH
are being broken in this thread.

can I get a lil moderation here please
thanks

reply to post by boondock-saint


Who are you accusing of multi accounts here? Better back up your accusations!

Just because more than one person agrees that what you post is pure propaganda, and that all of theCinic's posts are blatant lies and not backed up by evidence, doesn't mean they're all one guy with multiple accounts.

I might just as well accuse theCinic of being your 2nd account because he's about the only one agreeing with you in this thread...but I won't, because I won't accuse people without proof.

Originally posted by xavi1000
Lol ,this thread is still going after debunked here www.abovetopsecret.com...

And boondock fail to admit his mistake derail his own thread with CIA running the all world elections bs and other bla bla

This thread should be transfered in HOAX es

1) It's not debunked. Ellen gave only 1 scenario, the direct funding of OSI to wikileaks.
She did not address the money laundering from org to org to org to get the funds to
wikileaks which I have already.

2) I have already apologized for my mistake in the OP
by being fooled by wikileaks in the first place. Other than
that I have not made a mistake to the best of my knowledge.

3) No, this should not be sent to the hoax forum cuz
there is too much evidence presented over 70 pages
which show it NOT to be a hoax.

reply to post by boondock-saint


What's the giant revelation this thread shows then? If it's that Soros is evil, you failed. If it's that WL is the CIA/Mossad/Easter Bunny/Soros or the grinch who stole Xmas, you failed too. If it's that WL isn't important, you failed. If it's that WL&Assange did something horrible, you failed as wel.

So what is your point?

Originally posted by MrXYZ
So what is your point?

you have proved my point.

that point being that I am correct in
my evidence.

If I was wrong, there would NOT be
5 paid shills on this thread everyday
to the week making it their absolute goal
to derail this thread.

Actually, I'm really proud of myself.
On other threads, usually 2 shills do
the job. But for me, they've had to
call in re-enforcements.

5 shills = on the right track


so thank you for proving my point

reply to post by boondock-saint


How does us asking you to back up your baseless accusations with evidence make us shills?

If you believe everyone who doesn't agree with you is a shill, you're facing a lot of shills

I'm not even talking about theCinic's posts because those are beyond ridiculous, he hasn't posted evidence once. Your posts are nothing but "Soros is evil...blahblahbla...funds XYZ...XYZ is therefore evil too" without ever showing any evidence that would make Soros evil...or WL a bad thing. You're just posting propaganda without ever backing up your claims with evidence other than ridiculous opinion blogs that don't do proper research. This thread is only so long because people keep on asking for evidence, and all they get is more crap not based up by facts...which makes them ask for evidence again. And round and round it goes...until page 70.