Wikileaks Exposed - The man behind the NWO Curtain

Originally posted by thecinic
reply to post by SkurkNilsen

 

Wikileaks stated you would stay safe and anonymous which
Manning find out to his dismay wikileaks and Assange LIED
To get Manning to give the information.
Do you really think if Manning knew he would be in prison
the rest of his life for giving the information
so that Assange can sip wine and do cheap man hookers?
That he would of gave the information??....
No he would not have that would be silly.

Assange used manning and are using you good wikileak fanboys
as pawns pure tools in this whole game.

edit on 31-12-2010 by thecinic because: (no reason given)

Once again, you show that you've got not the slightest clue what you're talking about. Manning got caught because he bragged about his actions to a fellow hacker...WL had nothing to do with that.

Not that it matters, we all know you're gonna continue your hilarious crusade against free speech and wikilieaks....which is fine, it makes me and probably some others chuckle

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by backinblack
Me lie.????

yes, u lie !!!!

I don't debate liars.

and is it any coincidence that you
joined this forum the very week
that Soros started his campaign
through wikileaks to attack the
US Obama Administration?

and ur posts corroborate the
Soros agenda.

u are part of the problem

I will not discuss this topic with u anymore

good bye

where the [snip] is that ignore button
when I need to erase the shills from my screen ??
dam-bit

Bill, this is a prime example of why we
need the ignore button back.

Hmmm, so you call me a liar for stating the truth..
Then say you wont debate me anymore..
I wonder why?
Maybe because your mates facts are wrong..
Julian Assange WAS born in Queensland, not Melbourne..

But the truth doesn't suit your agenda,,
Maybe it's you guys on the '___', not Julian..

BTW Boon..I posted on the first page of this forum..
I wasn't alive when Soros supposidly started his world domination plans.

Assange is not even helping Manning.

Manning is sitting in prison and Assange
has not come out to help pay for legal fees.
Assange promised to help Manning
but lied PROOF Assange is a LIER

Why you ask?
Assange only cares about saving himself
when he owes his whole life to Manning.
This is disgusting behavior.
Manning NEVER would of gave the information over
if Assange did not promise to keep him anonymous
Assange did not do this he ratted Manning out.

Assange has a sickness a mental disorder.
He possibly has been molested.
This makes people do horrible things to other people.
Assange does not care who he hurts as he was hurt as
a child being in a cult (his own words).
Assange needs more psychological help
He is pushing the
the Soros backed NWO agenda.
Not knowing this as he uses the wikileak fanboys as tools..

Originally posted by thecinic
Assange is not even helping Manning.

Manning is sitting in prison and Assange
has not come out to help pay for legal fees.
Assange promised to help Manning
but lied PROOF Assange is a LIER

Why you ask?
Assange only cares about saving himself
when he owes his whole life to Manning.
This is disgusting behavior.
Manning NEVER would of gave the information over
if Assange did not promise to keep him anonymous
Assange did not do this he ratted Manning out.

Assange has a sickness a mental disorder.
He possibly has been molested.
This makes people do horrible things to other people.
Assange does not care who he hurts as he was hurt as
a child being in a cult (his own words).
Assange needs more psychological help
He is pushing the
the Soros backed NWO agenda.
Not knowing this as he uses the wikileak fanboys as tools..

edit on 1-1-2011 by thecinic because: (no reason given)

Give up mate..
Manning was caught out because of his own big mouth..
Nothing to do with wikileaks..

And tell me, how could Julian help someone that will be tried in a MILITARY COURT.??

Some people desperately want to ignore Wikileaks Icon "FREE MANNING" on their Twitter Account




Futhermore...

They desperately continue to ignore Wikileaks Twitter comments/announcements/requesting the public to donate to Manning followed by linking them to BradleyManning.org

Wikileaks Twitter Message for Manning Defense Fund

Bradley Manning defense fund needs YOU;
http://(link tracking not allowed)/9DyhoR
Wikileaks

What's more, they purposely refuse to read/listen/view away from tabloid msm, non credible websites and videos and refuse to acknowledge any updated information when its presented. If they did they would know Wikileaks as of 17th December announced £10,000 (sterling) would be sent to Bradley Mannings Defense Fund

[...]Wikileaks has had difficulties in the last months obtaining and accessing their funding, but they are as committed to supporting Bradley Manning as always and have issued the following statement:


2010-12-17 Statement from Wikileaks Regarding the Bradley Manning Defense Fund

" We will honour what we have pledged. We are quite strained right now and do not have full access to our limited resources, however, we have forwarded £10,000 (sterling) for the moment and informed Mr Coombs (Bradley's lawyer) about the transactions and it will take a few days to go through. "

NB: $10,000.00 GBP = $15,611.50 USD
Live rates at 2011.01.01 10:35:00 UTC

As acknowledged in the article linked above, Wikileaks' support for Manning has already resulted in substantial support for his defenders:

Loraine Reitman, a member of the group’s steering committee, shied away from placing blame on WikiLeaks.

“WikiLeaks is the reason we’ve been able to get so much money and donations,” she told Threat Level. “They’ve been linking to us and tweeting about us, and every time they do it, donations come in.”

Every time, any person/s from Wikileaks mentions Bradley Manning, the Bradley Manning Organisation sees a flood of donations sent to their Bradley Manning Defense Fund


Donations Collected So Far - Bradley Manning

[...]1,851 individuals have donated a total $117,451!
Another 380 supporters have given $30,001 directly to Bradley's legal trust account.
(Updated: 1am PST Dec. 21, 2010)

Bradley Manning's total legal defense will cost about $100,000.

We have transferred $80,000 towards that expense so far, are in the process making additional transfers, and are committed to funding the total needed.

The defense fund also supports international public outreach and activities.

Bradley Manning defense fund (tax-deductible donations)

The Bradley Manning defense fund is hosted by Courage to Resist in collaboration with the Bradley Manning Support Network.

About 50% of each donation is currently allocated to legal defense expenses, 35% towards public education and support activities, and 15% to direct admin expenses and credit card fees

Originally posted by thecinic

Assange did not do this he ratted Manning out.

Assange has a sickness a mental disorder.

And on you go with your blatant lies like a broken casette player

Again, it was a friend who ratted Manning out...a fellow hacker who he bragged to about his actions. Assange didn't rat Manning out! Hell, think about it, he has NOTHING to gain from ratting out Manning...so claiming he did just shows what a fool you are.

But please continue your baseless rants, they make me chuckle...I somehow always picture that angry German kid when I read your posts

It wasnt even a friend

Bradley Manning ended up communicating with Adrian Lamo online

Adrian Lamo a day or so later contacted the Authorities and people inside wire.com
Lamo continued communication online with Bradley Manning.

The Authorites have the orginal chatlogs
wire.com and washingtonpost.com have a copy of the full chat logs.

As most of us know wire.com and salon.com have a bunch of articles in reference to the whole ordeal/saga of the sequence of events, timing, framing, chat logs etc etc

Originally posted by thecinic
Where is the proof that wikileaks is helping Manning?

Originally posted by thecinic
When you have proof that Assange is helping Manning get out of prison
then you can show it to me...

Here you go.

Originally posted by Ellen15
Wikileaks as of 17th December announced £10,000 (sterling) would be sent to Bradley Mannings Defense Fund

[...]Wikileaks has had difficulties in the last months obtaining and accessing their funding, but they are as committed to supporting Bradley Manning as always and have issued the following statement:


2010-12-17 Statement from Wikileaks Regarding the Bradley Manning Defense Fund

" We will honour what we have pledged. We are quite strained right now and do not have full access to our limited resources, however, we have forwarded £10,000 (sterling) for the moment and informed Mr Coombs (Bradley's lawyer) about the transactions and it will take a few days to go through. "

NB: $10,000.00 GBP = $15,611.50 USD
Live rates at 2011.01.01 10:35:00 UTC

As acknowledged in the article linked above, Wikileaks' support for Manning has already resulted in substantial support for his defenders:

Loraine Reitman, a member of the group’s steering committee, shied away from placing blame on WikiLeaks.

“WikiLeaks is the reason we’ve been able to get so much money and donations,” she told Threat Level. “They’ve been linking to us and tweeting about us, and every time they do it, donations come in.”

Every time, any person/s from Wikileaks mentions Bradley Manning, the Bradley Manning Organisation sees a flood of donations sent to their Bradley Manning Defense Fund


Donations Collected So Far - Bradley Manning

[...]1,851 individuals have donated a total $117,451!
Another 380 supporters have given $30,001 directly to Bradley's legal trust account.
(Updated: 1am PST Dec. 21, 2010)

Bradley Manning's total legal defense will cost about $100,000.

We have transferred $80,000 towards that expense so far, are in the process making additional transfers, and are committed to funding the total needed.

Thanks to Ellen15 for the evidence that WikiLeaks is doing more than they ever needed to in this case and showing cinic for the LIAR (see, I can use big letters too) he/she is.

“Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away.”
-Elvis Presley

No Worries

Bradley Manning Organisation - Bradley Manning Defense Fund

Donations Collected So Far - Bradley Manning

1,851 individuals have donated a total $117,451!

Another 380 supporters have given $30,001 directly to Bradley's legal trust account.
(Updated: 1am PST Dec. 21, 2010)

Bradley Manning's total legal defense will cost about $100,000

We have transferred $80,000 towards that expense so far, are in the process making additional transfers, and are committed to funding the total needed

2010-12-17 Statement from Wikileaks Regarding the Bradley Manning Defense Fund

" We will honour what we have pledged.

We are quite strained right now and do not have full access to our limited resources, however, we have forwarded £10,000 (sterling) for the moment and informed Mr Coombs (Bradley's lawyer) about the transactions and it will take a few days to go through. "

NB: $10,000.00 GBP = $15,611.50 USD
Live rates at 2011.01.01 10:35:00 UTC

Loraine Reitman, a member of the group’s steering committee (on behalf of Bradley Manning Organisation/Defense Fund) :

Snippet:

“WikiLeaks is the reason we’ve been able to get so much money and donations,”

“They’ve been linking to us and tweeting about us, and every time they do it, donations come in.”

Manning has received NO MONEY from wikileaks.


Manning has been left to dry by Assange.


Assange is no better then a homeless bum *can we have your change sir*

*MOney please* *can I have your money*

Wikileaks IS A JOKE!!

reply to post by thecinic


That is ridicolous even by your standard cinic, you have been given the evidence you asked for but choose to ignore it and continue your mindless rant.
Just shows you for what you really are, just pathetic....

Originally posted by thecinic
Manning has received NO MONEY from wikileaks.


Manning has been left to dry by Assange.


Assange is no better then a homeless bum *can we have your change sir*

*MOney please* *can I have your money*

Wikileaks IS A JOKE!!

edit on 2-1-2011 by thecinic because: (no reason given)

Pathetic answer!!

All the proof you asked for has been provided, but you apparently prefer to remain a blind Beck-brainwashed sheeple and close your eyes and ears from reality. Sad really...

reply to post by thecinic


Stop with the constant lying. It's not funny. Isn't knowingly lying against T&C?
You claim that WL had something to do with Mannings arrest and at the same time know that noone in WL even knows if it was Manning who leaked the docs. Not to mention this lie about not helping Manning. Julian himself has spoken out in his defense. Also provided direct support. What more can he do? Go Rambo and break him free?

reply to post by PsykoOps

Originally posted by PsykoOps
reply to post by thecinic

 

Stop with the constant lying. It's not funny. Isn't knowingly lying against T&C?
You claim that WL had something to do with Mannings arrest and at the same time know that noone in WL even knows if it was Manning who leaked the docs. Not to mention this lie about not helping Manning. Julian himself has spoken out in his defense. Also provided direct support. What more can he do? Go Rambo and break him free?

Whats interesting to note is that this whitewashing ignorant tactic will only result in backslapping from various cronies of a similair persuasion and will not convince anybody new of the validity of these claims. Its probably time to leave these few posters alone in their mutual ego masturbation than give them more posts to respond to.

Unfortunately, outside of the confines of ATS, the MSM are using similair methods to defame a man (Assange) instead of reporting the actual meat of the leaks, with far more success than the 'three amigos' in this thread.

I for one review the actual leaks on a daily basis and can guarantee if they were more widely reported as facts they could indeed have the possibilty to be world changing.

Not gonna happen though, people like their kool-aid too much I guess.

reply to post by lnr42


If you want factual news, I suggest you go watch the Young Turks...Cenk Uygur is one of the VERY few guys who seem to not be blinded by propaganda brainwashing.







This one's hilarious:







Before theCinic or another muppet claims they're biased...disprove the content of what they say or your accusations are 100% baseless and nothing but a joke. Good luck, they do a really good job at backing up their claims. You are welcome to challenge me to disprove Beck&Co clips if you dare

reply to post by MrXYZ


Thanks for the links but I fear a lot of it will be either too involved or go completely over my head as I am not American.

I'll check em out anyway tho, cheers.

ETA: Even looking at the titles of the videos sends a chill through me!

reply to post by lnr42


All those videos basically show how the media/politics is screwed up. They obviously focus on the US, but it's the same in many other countries.

reply to post by MrXYZ

lemme get this straight,
you come on here and post a bunch
of the young turks videos from youtube
as a counter to Soros evidence?

Do you know who funds The Young Turks ????

Air America Programming - 2002-2006 (Soros funded) Soros did not bail out Air America from bankruptcy

Media Matters - 2008-present (Soros funded)

Do you know who just granted $1M to Media Matters ???

George Soros !!!!!

www.mediaite.com...

So ANYTHING that the young turks are gonna post
is gonna be good for Soros.

It gets worse -
The Young Turks are turning their listeners into
web soldiers.

www.beyondtheecho.net...

So anything out of the mouth of Uygur is gonna be propaganda
for the left. They pay his salary and his air time.

It seems we have some young turks soldiers
right here on this thread.

Google The Young Turks homepage AND their facebook page
and you'll also see "Media Matters" website links in their
menus and program partners.

And Media Matters just got busted for faking audio tracks
over Glen Beck videos to push their left propaganda.

www.canadafreepress.com...

and u expect people to trust these people or anything
they say ??? It's laughable.

related:
www.foxnews.com...

reply to post by boondock-saint


I don't care who funds them...they back up their claims with FACTS! Something FOX & CO. don't bother with...

Also, LOL at yet another Soros attack. I know, that evil evil old man also stole Xmas, eats puppies, and shoots nuns in his free time after raping little boys. Funny how nothing you posted so far shows Soros in a bad light. You claim he funds stuff...but it turns out most of that stuff is great and should receive more funds

Also, since you like the Young Turks, and god knows you really need a healthy dose of reality (not that I believe in god...I mean this as a figure of speech).



Love this one

How daaaaare he give $100mil to human rights causes...what an eviiiiiiiil man, right?

Glenn vs Wikileaks standup comedy show...hilarious


Also, you get -10 points for focusing on the messenger and packaging once again instead of the actual CONTENT of the message...just like you focus on Assange and Wikileaks instead of the content of the cables. You're too blind too even look at facts...all you want is being spoon fed propaganda without ever looking at the evidence.

Originally posted by MrXYZ
How daaaaare he give $100mil to human rights causes...what an eviiiiiiiil man, right?

he's not giving $100M to human rights groups
as a gesture of good will.

Did u not read Soros agenda on how to bring down
governments I posted a few pages back? His rule #1 was

bring in funds disguised as humanitarian aid.

and yes he is evil.