The Great Pyramid: A Conundrum Made of Stone (Built by ET's?)

The Ancient Aliens series on the History Channel had Christopher Dunn on one episode, explaining how the pyramid may have been a power plant for the ETs. Interesting stuff.

have you guys read this.

survive2012.com...

reply to post by 11118


Wow! A real eye opener.

Incredibly written OP.

i apologise if i am repeating anything as i really dont have the patience to read through all 18 pages ..i can't keep up.... This is an absolutly wonderful post... Great job OP... i did notice through the first few pages that people were making blanket statements that the pyramids were definalty made by man...I can say without any ego that we truly cannont know for sure if thy were or not...while most of us are arguing about how the pyramids were made we are constantly neglecting other details about the pyramid..One being the fact that it is in the centre of all lands mass... are we to belive that human beings who have no idea the size of the earth accidently built a pyramid in the centre of all lands mass? the building of the pyramids is obviously a very calculated task...Now i must remind everyone that our understanding of history is completely false....i wanted to point out other structures such as those in peru or those on the coast of japan that have carbon dates that go beyond the existence of man... can someone explaine that to me...or how is it that enceint civilisations suck as the summurians had knowledge of all the planets yet more recent history claim that we only found nepture uranus and pluto in the late eighteen hundreds and early nineteen hundreds....tablets even describe neptunes atmoshpere as being gaseus...i just wanted to point out that everyone is arguing a history that is completely wrong.... great post op..really great job...

Originally posted by FoxBenBen
while most of us are arguing about how the pyramids were made we are constantly neglecting other details about the pyramid..One being the fact that it is in the centre of all lands mass... are we to belive that human beings who have no idea the size of the earth accidently built a pyramid in the centre of all lands mass?

The reason this can be neglected is that it's not true. You shouldn't believe everything you read on the internet.

Originally posted by FoxBenBen
the building of the pyramids is obviously a very calculated task...Now i must remind everyone that our understanding of history is completely false....i wanted to point out other structures such as those in peru or those on the coast of japan that have carbon dates that go beyond the existence of man...

It also helps to at least know a tiny bit about that which you decide to post. See, carbon dating is useless beyond about 50 to 60 thousand years before the present. Man has been here around 5 times that long.

Originally posted by FoxBenBenhow is it that enceint civilisations suck as the summurians had knowledge of all the planets yet more recent history claim that we only found nepture uranus and pluto in the late eighteen hundreds and early nineteen hundreds....tablets even describe neptunes atmoshpere as being gaseus

They didn't, and no such tablets exist.

Again, you shouldn't believe everything you read on the internet. Not even this post.

Harte

Actually the Great Pyramid is the at the center of all land masses.

The Pyramid lies in the center of gravity of the continents. It also lies in the exact center
of all the land area of the world, dividing the earth's land mass into approximately equal quarters.



The north-south axis (31 degrees east of Greenwich) is the longest land meridian, and the east-west axis (30 degrees north) is the longest land parallel on the globe. There is obviously only one place that these longest land-lines of the terrestrial earth can cross, and it is at the Great Pyramid.

reply to post by Harte


Not a fan of your condesending tone.... Explain to me what this is? www.2012online.org...

that was fact about carbon dating i did not know. but the internet was not my source of information....maybe i must back track and learn more beofre i put my two cents in

So what accounts for the smaller pyramids which provided served as a precusor to the larger Pyramids?

Were the Aliens learning how to build pyramids before attempting the larger ones.

Originally posted by CrazyMonkey
So what accounts for the smaller pyramids which provided served as a precusor to the larger Pyramids?

Were the Aliens learning how to build pyramids before attempting the larger ones.

There are many conclusions.

However, it would seem the smaller pyramids may have been built with information passed down and the larger pyramid(s) built by those who passed down information.

This is all fringe science though.

It seems more likely that the pyramid bricks were actually made with concrete, so all they would need were timber frames and buckets.

reply to post by CrazyMonkey


I think they were trying to copy the great pyramid.

Originally posted by 11118
This is all fringe science though

Exactly. No serious historians or Egyptologists take these stories with any value. We have ample evidence of the human construction of the great pyramids, in fact there is a massive worker's camp nearby that is being extensively worked on by Egyptologists as of recently IIRC.

Originally posted by Turiddu

Originally posted by 11118
This is all fringe science though

Exactly. No serious historians or Egyptologists take these stories with any value. We have ample evidence of the human construction of the great pyramids, in fact there is a massive worker's camp nearby that is being extensively worked on by Egyptologists as of recently IIRC.

It should be pointed out the significance in that no serious historians or Egyptologists point out flaws in current accepted theoretical conclusions that are being read as factual data either.


I think that the perspective is quite narrow and not encompassing other possibilities which is inevitably causing bias illations.

The archeological community that is "mainstream" shuns anyone who expresses different conclusions which may shake/break the current theories.

I see more evidence pointing in a different direction neither supporting "fringe" or "mainstream" theories but a different slant presented all on it's own.

All in time.

I'm up to Page 3 of this thread currently but had to stop and point out a glaring contradiction I have found.

This.....

post by 11118
Written by Herodotus -
Cheops, they said, reigned for fifty years, and on his death the kingship was taken over by his brother Chephren. He also made a pyramid... it is forty feet lower than his brother's pyramid, but otherwise of the same greatness... Chephren reigned for fifty-six years...then there succeeded Mycerinus, the son of Cheops... This man left a pyramid smaller than his father's.

Contradicts this.....

Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by 11118

 

The Romans and Muslims both burned the libraries of Egypt. In Addition, numerous times kings and queens destroyed their ancestors weightings. This is when they scrape off the details.

Also, sorry, they are not theoretical. The diagrams of the devices are right in there. And to state the temple is not related shows your lack of knowledge of the civilization. The Giza pyramid was considered the last in a 200-150 year series of construction projects, starting with Zoser's pyramid. This pyramid marked the first time Egypt made a pyramid. It was primitive, lousy, and incomplete. Archeologists have discovered that the architect Imhotep, who built it, returned to the project after its completion and built more ontop of it. This first pyramid was made simply because the Pharaoh wanted a mountain, so the standard burial mastaba was stacked up like a mountain.

After that pyramid, later on came an experimental Pharaoh called Sneferu. Sneferu did not built one pyramid, he built quite a few. He took the design idea and made it bigger. Problem was, the pyramids were flawed structures, because they built them with slanted bricks. So when they finally made a big enough one, the pyramid exploded from the pressure, known as the fail pyramid, or the pyramid at Meidum. He discovered this fatal flaw and had his men orient the bricks flat. Thus, he then decided to make another pyramid, one that tested angles. This is known as the Bent pyramid. Finally, the man finished off his life with his legacy pyramid, the North Pyramid, also called the Red Pyramid. He built this after all the experiments, failures, and successes of he and his ancestors. But it wasn't finished. The Red pyramid set a precedent, it was the largest of its day. It had to be outdone. So the next dude up took the pyramid, and scaled it up to what you see at giza today. Giza is the results of over 200 years of construction, experiment, and development. By humans. No aliens, because I don't see how the hell aliens that can build space ships to get here would take 200 yeas to design something like that. it was made by man.

No theory, no false. The fact of the matter is that the Giza pyramid did not pop out of the air. It is the last of a series. The evolution of structure.

Now how is the temple related? The Egyptians were done. They stopped building Pyramids shortly there after. They moved on to bigger and better things. For them, that was temples. Some temples had small pyramids on them to allude back to their ancestors, because without them, they would not have the know how of how to build the temples. The knowledge gained from. over a dozen pyramids and 150-200 years of research and development allowed them the capacity yo produce amazing temples and works thereafter. Eventually the Egyptians stopped even bothering with pyramids.

It's funny. The Egyptians got bored with the design and so went onto something new. You folks worship their preschool art like God himself came down to design it. Sorry to burst your bubble, but moving rocks around and building simply geometries is not that hard. That's why the Egyptians got bored and moved onto more complex forms, as I showed in the temple I posted.

Feel I'm wrong? Tell me how. until then, I;'d rather trust researching specialists over a conspiracy theory that's laughable once you get a basic college education in architecture.

So which is it? Did the Great Pyramid come first or last?

Originally posted by 11118
Actually the Great Pyramid is the at the center of all land masses.

The Pyramid lies in the center of gravity of the continents. It also lies in the exact center
of all the land area of the world, dividing the earth's land mass into approximately equal quarters.

Every point on the surface of the Earth is at the "center of all land masses."

Originally posted by FoxBenBen
reply to post by Harte

 

Not a fan of your condesending tone....

That's unfortunate. Here's more: it's condescending. That's even worse now, I bet.

Explain to me what this is? www.2012online.org...

Cylinder Seal VA 243 commemorating an offering, likely to some god having to do with a fertile harvest. The guy on the left is making an offering to the seated god - associated with the harvest by the harvesting tool he's holding (a scythe or hoe or something). The middle guy is another god. You can tell by their hats and flounced clothing.

Inscription reads "“Dubsiga, Ili-illat, your servant."

However, I know you mean the stars pictured in the upper left. They are stars, not planets and not the sun.

Here's the Sumerian Sun symbol, on the right, with the moon in the center and a star on the left. Note the wavy lines in the sun symbol:



Here it is again, on the lower right, with the same other two symbols:



Obviously a star.

One theory on why these stars are in the pic (has to be theoretical since the seal doesn't mention it) is that the twelve stars are associated with the twelve member Sumerian Holy Council of gods, and the big star is Anu - the main god (all their gods had their own stars/planets - Ishtar/Venus for example.) Except their sun god Shamash - he had the sun (of course.)

We know they are stars because the Sumerians left pics of the Pleiades, which was an important constellation to them, which used the same types of symbols for "little" stars (dots) shown below (top right of seal.)




Enough?

Harte

It was neither the first nor the last.

Harte

reply to post by Harte


Correct.

And to your previous post I quote from one of my previous posts.

The north-south axis (31 degrees east of Greenwich) is the longest land meridian, and the east-west axis (30 degrees north) is the longest land parallel on the globe. There is obviously only one place that these longest land-lines of the terrestrial earth can cross, and it is at the Great Pyramid.

wow after reading through all 18 pages, bickering and battering against each other i have finally came to a conclusion about how i think the pyramids were created. simply put its to illogical to think that humans made these with the technology they had back than. it just... doesn't add up in my superior brain, it makes much more sense after reading numerous articles about our ( humans ) origins and alien DNA. that yeah aliens came from another planet and enslaved us to mine minerals in our earth, left a few behind ( thats where the bloodlines aka rulers aka elite aka PTB originate from ) and to this day they have fed us a lie in teachings from school, MSM. to keep us in the dark and control us, makes a whole lot of sense when you take in every perspective in 'our' 'history' and connect the dots. if your a smart person, a logical person and an 'enlightened' person you will see that this is how it happened from day 1, 300 000 years ago, peace out fellow humans may the conscious shift many of you need come upon you.

Very good read. S&F!
I've always thought that the pyramids were strange. Another member mentioned that the coffin seems like a perfect size for a gray. Maybe these "pharoahs" were really grays. The tomb/coffin seems a little small for a human being.

cool thats very cool.