It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by BigTimeCheater
Castrate him and remove children from the unemployed mothers until they are financially able to support the child on their own.
Problem solved.
That, or just kill the irresponsible parasite.
Originally posted by Asktheanimals
How many stupid women do you have over there?
Originally posted by Sherlock Holmes
Originally posted by Asktheanimals
How many stupid women do you have over there?
A lot, mate, a lot.
Cases of young women ( and some not so young ) making absolutely atrocious and irresponsible decisions about sexual partners are very common.
This case is just a little out of the ordinary, because of the large number of children involved.
I believe that schools should put a heavier focus on civic responsibility, especially in regards to girls like these.
Of course, that should be the parents job, but when they fail their children, then teachers unavoidably have to step in.
Originally posted by Advantage
Dont be fooled.. its just as bad here if not worse due to a few states individual social welfare programs ( IE illinois). When we have day care in high school.. we have issues.
Originally posted by Sherlock Holmes
.
I was just commenting from personal experience on the kind of British girls that this guy has impregnated.
Originally posted by Advantage
Hopefully not TOO personal
Originally posted by Advantage
In any case, I have no idea where these people get the idea this is anywhere remotely normal behavior... the man as well as the women. Being a woman I really cant understand the thinking behind this kind of lifestyle and choices. I mean, the guy gets his jolies and moves on.. the woman has a burden internally for 9 months and then externally until she drops dead. Id just think women knowing the real burden would at the very least use protection.
Originally posted by Maslo
- limit child benefits to 2 children max
Originally posted by Maslo
- if someone is making more children than he/she can afford to take care of properly, sterilize him/her (reversibly, of course), since he/she is willfully infringing upon other persons right to grow up in good conditions. Infringement upon right justifies infringement upon right.
Originally posted by SpaceJ
She's got a nice little set up for herself and spends all the money on clothing, getting her hair done, nails, you name it. She's on her 3rd as we speak, with a 3rd father, and she's never been married (not that that has too much to do with the situation, but you know). She gets help from the state, and child support, and free healthcare for her and the kids.