It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by detachedindividual
Originally posted by amurphy245
reply to post by ker2010
SK fired the first shot and NK retaliated,Where is the conspiracy.edit on 28-11-2010 by amurphy245 because: (no reason given)
And your proof of this would be...?
Please stop trying to rewrite history on these boards. There is no evidence to suggest that SK fired aggressively at NK first, absolutely none.
NK provides no evidence for it, China provides no evidence for it, and yet you alone somehow KNOW that SK fired first.
Originally posted by amurphy245
Originally posted by detachedindividual
Originally posted by amurphy245
reply to post by ker2010
SK fired the first shot and NK retaliated,Where is the conspiracy.edit on 28-11-2010 by amurphy245 because: (no reason given)
And your proof of this would be...?
Please stop trying to rewrite history on these boards. There is no evidence to suggest that SK fired aggressively at NK first, absolutely none.
NK provides no evidence for it, China provides no evidence for it, and yet you alone somehow KNOW that SK fired first.
I thought this was common knowledge? SK fired into DPRK's territorial waters and the DPRK shelled the Island where the fleet originated from.You think they just fired for the sake of it? they were making a point of defending their waters,ignoring such an intrusion would be a sign of weakness.
You want proof go find it yourself,or just carry on sucking up south koreas side of the story.
Originally posted by amurphy245
Originally posted by detachedindividual
Originally posted by amurphy245
reply to post by ker2010
SK fired the first shot and NK retaliated,Where is the conspiracy.edit on 28-11-2010 by amurphy245 because: (no reason given)
And your proof of this would be...?
Please stop trying to rewrite history on these boards. There is no evidence to suggest that SK fired aggressively at NK first, absolutely none.
NK provides no evidence for it, China provides no evidence for it, and yet you alone somehow KNOW that SK fired first.
I thought this was common knowledge? SK fired into DPRK's territorial waters and the DPRK shelled the Island where the fleet originated from.You think they just fired for the sake of it? they were making a point of defending their waters,ignoring such an intrusion would be a sign of weakness.
You want proof go find it yourself,or just carry on sucking up south koreas side of the story.
Originally posted by Sentinel412
reply to post by Reaper2137
Actually he is right. The very first reports claimed that SK fired, then NK shot back. Then every news is changed to the NK shot first story. It's similar to the St. Ossetian incident, where the news agencies are told that the Russians attacked Georgia without any true reason. But in the reality, the first reports said that Georgians attacked and killed 2000 civilians in the previous night and then the Russians marched into Georgia to protect the Ossetians.
I believe this is the same scenario. Right now all the news channels are blaming the NK, but the first reports really mentioned the SK provoked NK with something and fired first. Maybe you can find some trace about it here on ATS too.
Actually Reaper, if you would be interested in the truth, you would look after his claims. But as you're clearly just mocking others and laughing at others when someone else has a different info then yours, I rather take him seriously, then any of your responses. You, Reaper cannot be taken seriously at all.edit on 28-11-2010 by Sentinel412 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by peter_kandra
Originally posted by boondock-saint
2 noteworthy articles
China calls for urgent/emergency talks
www.foxnews.com...
South Korea accidentally fires shell
www.cnn.com...
It's about to get deep gentlemen
ban the hatches and save the babies
with all the Carrier Task Groups out to sea
a couple blows from China's DF21 to
our carriers and the US Mainland is open
to invasion from the Pacific.
Interesting scenario, but open to invasion from who? How in the world is another country going to mobilize enough ships to get a large enough contingent on the US mainland? That's also assuming our army and marines would just bow down and our east coast carriers couldn't make it through the Panama Canal in time. Then there's also the matter of millions of 2nd ammendment followers.
Originally posted by Sentinel412
reply to post by Reaper2137
I believe it would be better if you would stop demand anything from people, tell them how should they act, because it's pretty boring, just as your childish mocking which is actually just presenting your intelligence level and that your parents didn't make a good job when it was about teach you how to behave. You're an adult, right? Then act as an adult and look after these things. It's very easy and now we're leaving you the freedom to look after his claims. Don't be lazy. ATS is about research. Now, he is leaving it to you.
But the fact is I also remember for that what he mentioned. It was between one of the first posts regarding this matter (So I already gave you a hint where to look.). Have a nice research, kiddo.edit on 28-11-2010 by Sentinel412 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by dontreally
Soon these 'exercises' will become a full blown military confrontation.
This will probably be the first seriousy war of the modern era, with a nation vs. a nation.
*sigh*
Originally posted by Sentinel412
reply to post by Reaper2137
I believe it would be better if you would stop demand anything from people, tell them how should they act, because it's pretty boring, just as your childish mocking which is actually just presenting your intelligence level and that your parents didn't make a good job when it was about teaching you how to behave. You're an adult, right? Then act as an adult and look after these things. It's very easy and now we're leaving you the freedom to look after his claims. Don't be lazy. ATS is about research. Now, he is leaving it to you.
But the fact is I also remember for that what he mentioned. It was between one of the first posts regarding this matter (So I already gave you a hint where to look.). Have a nice research, kiddo.edit on 28-11-2010 by Sentinel412 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Sentinel412
reply to post by Reaper2137
Usually that one used to say "Get a life" who don't have any. So please stop this as you're just embarassing yourself. As I said if you would be interested in the truth, regardless you served your country for decade, you would do a proper research to get answers. I also served my country, but when a question is arised, I looked after the proper answers on my own when it was necessary, even if I knew the answer what I may find is maybe not the one that I'm going to like.
You simply fear the truth. But if you fear the truth, what the hell are you doing here at ATS?edit on 28-11-2010 by Sentinel412 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by amurphy245
i dont have to prove anything,its of no concern to me if you believe me or not im just giving you the facts from the north's perspective from which KCNA is the main news source.
The military is conducting an exercise unrelated to joint maneuvers with the U.S.