Would You Really Want Sarah Palin As Your President?

I don't know. This past election in my eyes had NO ONE worth voting for. The worse choices ever in a presidential election. I am not a fan of McCain, but I do respect what he did for the country when he served. All we can do now is live with what we have and watch where this roller coaster takes us all. They are ALL puppets. And the ones who are not do not stand a chance. That is sad.

Originally posted by somewhereisthetruth
Hello ATS,



Is there a bliss-like blindness driving some people, mesmerizing them to follow their leaders no matter what the consequences? I don't think I need to remind you which country is famous for that type of attitude.

Have a nice day!

Hi.....I'm not going to defend Ms. Palin, but I do think you hit the nail on the head regarding what drives people to vote for our so-called charismatic and messiah like leaders if you get my jist.

Absolutely not.

2nd line.

Originally posted by woodwardjnr
Surely you guys can come up with someone better than Sarah Palin. Are there no other candidates? I dont believe that in the US you cant find yourself a decent president.

That would be Ron Paul.

"Come meet the old boss, same as the old boss..."

My point is that it really does not matter which gaff machine we get, the results are the same. Biden is Palin is Obama is McCain...

reply to post by spokthunder


grrrrr, bad form bad form. man are the beast responsible for the world chaos.Man is running the world. Not that palin can do the job because she cannot....but to say a woman cannot is BADFORM

Fear drives, and feeds a strong central government. Our fear feeds into the power of this entity. We give it strength, through our fear and ignorance. We're all afraid of our neighbors. We NEED someone to protect us from ourselves. We have small, nuclear families, communities are a thing of the past. Any time we are approached by "strangers", we think to ourselves, "What does this person want to take from me?" I get looked at like a thief by an elderly woman when I ask her if she needs help carrying her overloaded bags. If you see a person walking down a long, dangerous road, many times they will refuse the offer of a free lift to where they are going, because they suspect I wish to abduct, and hurt them.

Sure, there are plenty of nasty, evil people out there - but no matter how many laws, security, etc we enact, there will still be Serial Murderers, thieves, and those who wish nothing but harm to their fellow man - But, are these evil people born that way? Or are they simply a reflection of our Society, and culture? I have spent, and still do spend, lots of time in VERY impoverished local neighborhoods, and you know what? The majority of the people who live there are GOOD people. I was never "beat-up", nor robbed, nor even threatened. When you enter an area to help people, people that are labeled unworthy by society, it's amazing the hospitality you will experience.

Maybe I'm just naive to believe that most people are Good, and given the right circumstances, that everyone, regardless of status, wealth, age, beliefs, looks, what-have-you, can work together for the betterment of mankind, rather then the simple pursuit of their own, and (maybe) their direct family's welfare. Maybe at some point in our spiritual evolution, we will wake up to idea that feeding a thousand hungry children is WORTH MORE then a luxury Yacht. Helping a neighbor who is struggling should be more rewarding in our society, then buying that new 50' HDTV, but we all know it is not.

We have a culture of Dog eat Dog, take from the other, before they take it from you. It's all for naught. You can believe you "own" all these fancy, blinking things, or the land you live on, but you don't. You "rent" it for the short time you are here. The only thing that truly belongs to you, is your soul, your humanity, but most people simply take it for granted, and only concentrate on tangible things that they can hold in their hand, or see with their eyes, but that is all fleeting, while actions, emotions, and connections, I believe, are forever. You will never lose "ownership" of the great things you can do to help your fellow man, but someone else will "own" all of your belongings, one way or another, after you are gone.

I'd vote for her unless something better came along. She would be better than what we have in there now. Chicago and politics in the same sentence equals CROOK!! I'm afraid that we will not know the extent of the damage done to this country until way after he has left office. I just wonder whose pockets the money will go in.

Originally posted by graceunderpressure
Could it be that TPTB are offering Palin as the frontrunner of the moment simply because she IS so awful? Then, as the next election draws closer, their real choice for a puppet to replace her can't help but be perceived as better?

I think you are correct. Obama is out of it. Even the democrats are sick of him. His job was to give us Obamacare, The Food Safety Con S-510 and Cap and Trade.

Along with the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 that gives us all three points of

"Control oil and you control nations; control food and you control the people; control money and you control the world." ~ Henry Kissinger ..."

I think they are saving up Hilary Clinton for the 2012 Presidency. As some have said at least she is obviously smart even if she is a traitorous treacherous B!t$h.

I really wish we had something besides Corporate/Bankster puppets to vote FOR. Unfortunately a vote for third part is a vote for a Corporate/Bankster puppet too. SIGHhhh

Sarah Palin is the least of our worries,

I am going for a ron paul- jesse ventura ticket, BUT to kick out the soros-bush-cia-established families out of the presidential office as of late, i say hell yes i would vote for her. i dont see her bowing to the saudi king, i wouldnt expect her to go around the country apologizing, and i dont think she would keep this false war going on, as she has no vested interests. Hell she might even get rid of the Patriot Act. So again why are so many people wining about her

is a president that says what he-she meant to much to ask for anymore?
In my eyes we could get a bum off the streets that could do better than the last 5 or so presidents, not a tough role to fill when you have so many advisors helping.

Originally posted by somewhereisthetruth
Hello ATS,

I usually refrain from making politically-charged threads, however after reading the following:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

I'm really wondering how anyone can possibly defend this woman and - even more grotesquely - how could anyone want to see this woman as president.

Is there a bliss-like blindness driving some people, mesmerizing them to follow their leaders no matter what the consequences? I don't think I need to remind you which country is famous for that type of attitude.

Have a nice day!

We are so attuned to entertainment that the office of the presidency has been reduced to being equal with American Survivor or Dancing with the president or some other such nonsense.

Palin would be a world class embarrassment. Can anyone seriously imagine that dummy siting across a table with other world leaders who have decades of experience in international relations? I would not give her more than a McDonalds franchise based upon what she has shown me so far. The most important thing is that I want my leaders to be smarter than I am. She is most definitely not that. I'd debate her right now with no preparation on any topic except beauty aids for senior citizens.

HECK NO

reply to post by somewhereisthetruth


If Sarah Palin got elected, it would be the beginning of an Idiotocracy. Luckily she has no chance of getting elected. If the Republicans are smart, they'll nominate Ron Paul, as he's the only one that can possibly win. Mitt Romney? Not a chance. Mike Huckabee? Nope. Sarah Palin? Absolutely not. R. Paul? Possibly. Obama? Probably...

Well, Palin has no respect whatsoever internationally.....

But who cares....??
It will make no major difference anyway, as all are puppets on strings of TPTB.

So keep cool and relax...

Ron Paul.

Her record as a governor? ARE YOU SERIOUS??? She didn't even complete her term because she realized she could make more money doing speeches and working for a news network.

Do you refuse to believe that her entire administration was constantly under attack from the left wing filing unfounded ethics complaints that she had to defend out of her own pocket? It was an organized attack aimed at nothing more than discrediting her. She is not perfect but she is certainly better than what we have now. I don't think she could be as powerful as President as she is the voice of the average American. She is needed but not in the presidentcy. Unfortunately no one else can be trusted in the position.