It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by iceofspades
Personally I think Hillary is a good woman as well as a good politician. I would be happy to vote for both of them.
originally posted by Bout Time
Huh?
The only straw that I can figure you're grasping at is that Hillary is a Moderate & that Kerry, in your opinion, is a Far Lefty?
She's been an outsatanding Jr. Senator. I happen to think my home state has the best pair in the business.
Originally posted by FredT
What are my choices? W with his ultra right wing christian conservative gonna take away the 1st ammendment group, Or Kerry, Im going to tax you to death, stifle free trade, etc etc
Our choices suck.
Originally posted by Phoenix
My family is from upstate and I honestly have to say it is depressing to visit there for any more than a couple of days simply because I know how much better off most other places are. So much for the job those two Senators do, glad I left when I did.
BTW the straw was the fact that Hillary has enough bones in her closet to out do the bonesman themselves plus the fact that her brand of socialism makes the entire field appear far right - hence she makes JK look viable in comparison but I must say it would humor me if she ran as VP.
[edit on 30-6-2004 by Phoenix]
Originally posted by Jamuhn
WHile you are at it, why don't you explain why the electoral system is better than popular vote, especially in these days when state boundaries are virtually meaningless in the eyes of federal government.
Originally posted by MaskedAvatar
Why would anyone find it hard to "swallow" Hillary Clinton as VP of the United States? Where exactly is the problem - is it being tainted with scandals of a lower order than other politicians? Are her scandals not big enough to rank with the biggest and best VP scandals, such as Cheney's? Is she not corrupt enough?
Originally posted by UM_Gazz
We need more substance from both parties and less mud slinging.. There is way too much at stake in this election.. and it seems at some point we will be forced to choose the lesser of two evils... and that is not really fair or american.. Sorry just my opinion here.
Originally posted by Phoenix
BTW the straw was the fact that Hillary has enough bones in her closet to out do the bonesman themselves plus the fact that her brand of socialism makes the entire field appear far right - hence she makes JK look viable in comparison but I must say it would humor me if she ran as VP.
[edit on 30-6-2004 by Phoenix]
Originally posted by curme
If you want to talk bones, let's talk about Laura Bush accidently killing her boyfriend when she was a teen. LINK The Dems have been respectful and never mention it. If it was Hillary, it'd be on the radio everyday. People just love to tear her to pieces.
Bush has removed some of our freedoms. (Patriot act).
Bush has turned the U.S. into a war mongering nation.
Bush has changed our Armed Forces into a non volunteer force.
Bush mislead us or at least did not do what a President should do and make sure his facts are straight before leading us into war. He did not do the leg work or have the patience to insure Iraq had WMD etc... before commiting our men and women to war.
Bush has caused a rift between the U.S. and several of our allies and probably spoiled a budding relationship between us and the Russians and the EU.
Please tell me exactly what freedoms you have lost because of President Bush.
The official press organ of Saudi Arabia says that US Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton's trip to the Middle East shows she's planning to run for President in 2004. But ArabNews.com advises that if Sen. Clinton ever wants to win the White House, she should first run as Gen. Wesley Clark's Vice Presidential candidate.