It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Byteman
Originally posted by EarthOccupant
In the last 100 years there was no significant inventions on engines? Saving fuels? I'm i to believe that with trillions of budget all around the world the took 100 years to invent a Toyota Hybrid ?
Fun fact, the Model-T Ford (1908) got 25 miles per gallon.
The current EPA average is 21 miles per gallon.
We have in fact gone backwards.
Originally posted by Nightfury
Imagine what a different world we would be living in if the public were allowed access to such technologies. That's why I don't buy into the whole global warming thing. If government were so concerned about it, why suppress clean and more efficient technologies?
Originally posted by danwild6
From what I've read this only apears to be a watch list. It doesn't look to me that any of these technologies have been suppressed.
Originally posted by CIAGypsy
Bedlam,
How many patents do you currently hold?
The ones I currently have aren't enough to raise the wrath of a 181. However, there are two devices that I'm working on which could end up there. They aren't meant to be weapons or used for nefarious purposes, but it wouldn't take much for a smart person to figure out how to use it for that...
Originally posted by Bedlam
I went to buy [x] a couple of weeks back and thought it would have been something you could just pick up at Best Buy for a couple hundred bucks but apparently it's never been done.
The other one I got the idea for from ATS (that's two), I have to get a ruling from FCC on whether a device that's not an active emitter is allowed to intentionally produce interference, it looks like a sort of blank area in the law. Depending on whether or not I can, it'll influence my claim list. I'm pretty sure you can't have a claim that's intentionally unlawful and I'm sure I'll be challenged on it.
The ones I currently have aren't enough to raise the wrath of a 181. However, there are two devices that I'm working on which could end up there. They aren't meant to be weapons or used for nefarious purposes, but it wouldn't take much for a smart person to figure out how to use it for that...
Clever wording of the claims might end up helping there. Just make sure you don't discuss the thing with your buddies, if you want to keep them happy with you later, should you actually GET a 181.
On the other hand, there's some things you just can't hide easily no matter how weaselly you word them.
Originally posted by EarthOccupant
Hi all,
I came across a post in another forum about the "patent" watch list, made by the US government.
of course there are a lot of stuff witch would be wise to keep out of the public because they are dangerous, there are also a few dubious items on that list.
At the end anything that can help you, can help a soldier.. but that would mean a total stop to development of human beneficial knowledge (what seems to happen already the last 100 years)
Note that the list is from 1971 acquired trough the FOI act, notice that already at that time they did not wanted energy saving equipment along the public...
To name a view:
"Fuel Conservation Technology" and
"Alternative Fuels".
as being subject to Suppression... also
"Pollution Reduction Technology" and
"Apparatus for Increasing Efficiency" and
"Hydrogen Enrichment Technologies".
Photo-voltaic panels "in excess of 20% efficient" !!
Original post: Original post
PDF with list
edit on 15-11-2010 by EarthOccupant because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by CIAGypsy
Have you done a patent search on it? Don't take *anything* as gospel that comes from the hacks at Best Buy.
I have to admit, this one has me a bit curious. My background is engineering and physics, specifically in wired and wireless communications....although this isn't exactly the area where I do my research/inventions.
Originally posted by Pryde87
I have just took time to read this and Im sorry to say its a load of rubbish. The document has been misunderstood.
I work in the defence industry and see this kind of thing all the time. It is not a list of things that you are not allowed to invent. It is a list of things that the government wants you to invent. It is their shopping list. They distribute these lists to defence companies and if we can supply them with a product on that list then we let them know.
The list just states what the government would like and then the defence companies go out and try and fulfil their wishes. The government is not forbidding the invention of those products, they are actively encouraging it.
Originally posted by ANNED
The patents on the Fischer–Tropsch process have long since expired so why are the plants not being built across the US to replace landfills.
Who is stopping the building of these fuel plants.edit on 19-12-2010 by ANNED because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by sharpy777
Maybe you cant invent these because if they eventually replaced oil driven energies, this would take trillions from the US budget.
You cant interfere with a trillion dollars +.
Originally posted by sharpy777
Maybe you cant invent these because if they eventually replaced oil driven energies, this would take trillions from the US budget.
You cant interfere with a trillion dollars +.