It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The House Armed Services Committee’s top Republican says he favors shifting defense dollars to boost U.S. missile defense and to counter China’s ability to limit U.S. operations in the western Pacific. “While China today may not intend to attack our carriers, neutralize our bases in Japan and Guam, or push back our naval presence out of the South China Sea, they are without question making the investments and developing capabilities to do just that,”
The uninvited guest: Chinese sub pops up in middle of U.S. Navy exercise, leaving military chiefs red-faced
Originally posted by nite owl
I really don't think you have to worry with this technology. www.youtube.com... even if it was a missle i'm sure they were doing manuvers and testing. above water and below. BRING IT ON. The new tech now is much more imprssive than this 2004 version.
Originally posted by boondock-saint
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/e489ae1e0d53.jpg[/atsimg]
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by zcflint05
Speaking for myself, I concluded it was a jet contrail long before the government said anything about it. Determining which flight it was required evidence which was not available at first.
What evidence is there that this was a missile?
Originally posted by Myendica
reply to post by Gradius Maximus
best evidence is that you arent going to see a plane in Hawaii from california.. theres no way..
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by zcflint05
Speaking for myself, I concluded it was a jet contrail long before the government said anything about it. Determining which flight it was required evidence which was not available at first.
What evidence is there that this was a missile?