It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Strange Object near the Sun (11/14/2010)

page: 8
60
<< 5  6  7    9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 05:20 PM
link   
It is possible that it is a comet. Spaceweather.com posted a gif of the sun with a comet plume. Check it out it may be that mysterious spot.

spaceweather.com


Rhain



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 06:06 PM
link   
The simplest explanation would be some kind of camera artifact, but its still strange.

I believe it is probably a camera artifact because it does not move(it appears like its moving but in reality its jus the shakiness of the image appearing that way).

Although i am open to other opinions.



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 06:29 PM
link   
Interesting thread, especially the idea that there is dirt, dust or whatever on the lens or main capture sensor of the camera.

Now I dont know about the camera used to take the photographs, but i do know about still cameras.
Hense I stuck a piece of paper on a lens and took a couple of pics.

Pic 1
Canon Eos 30D with an 85mm F1.8 lense. Plus a piece of paper stuck to the front element
Pic taken with a 40D and 24-70 F2.8 lens

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/ea42e9a2658b.jpg[/atsimg]


Pic 2
The target DVD on a white piece of paper

As you can see it does not affect the image on the sensor. This would be the same if the paper was stuck on the back element. This only leaves the sensor itself. Or in the case of the camera used to take the sun pic, whatever it is that captures the image.

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/dd4a247bd02d.jpg[/atsimg]
edit on 15-11-2010 by captiva because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 08:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by Terviseks
On the NASA website you can see the Soft X-ray movie and picture showing the non-moving object. (Left side of the sun).

Could it be a large mothership ?
Could it be part of the tomorow NASA's message ?

Here are the link to the picture and the video :

sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov...

sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov...

(Right click and save it on your HD).
edit on 14-11-2010 by Terviseks because: missing links


Planet X ....They say it triggers earthquakes. That it rips open volcanoes, and unleashes massive tsunamis. They say it can kick the Earth’s axis over, pushing Africa to the pole and Antarctica to the equator. It may even stop our planet from rotating! Or worse: peel the Earth’s crust off, tear our planet to bits. Or perhaps it simply sweeps our world aside, pushing it into the Sun. That’s the way it goes when suddenly, a HUGE planet zooms by. They say.

The demon planet that is supposed to do the trick goes by many names. Some call it Nibiru, or Marduk. Others named it The Ottawa Object, or Vulcan, or Transpluto. But most people prefer X, just X. `Planet X’, to be precise.

Planet X is the supposedly eleventh planet of our solar system. It should be as big as many Earths, dwarfing it perhaps even hundreds of times. Some people think X isn’t even a real planet, but a `brown dwarf’: a massive ball of dust and gas that almost succeeded in becoming a star. Planet X has something no other planet has: a huge orbit. Its orbit around the Sun lasts 3,600 years. Most of the time, it is far off, invisible to the eye. But every 3,600 years, the lost planet returns. Once here, it accelerates, and swings close past the Sun, disrupting everything it encounters. myth maybe ..real maybe you be the judge.

www.youtube.com...
edit on 11/06/2010 by awcgs because: url was wrong I reposted new one



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 10:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by Terviseks

Originally posted by angrydog
maybe just a broken pixel on the camera ?



I don't think so, as the satellite as to move, the camera has to not be centred all the time, especially in space... The black-mysterious-object is always at the same distance and position from the sun than the satellite which reccords the sun's soft X-Ray.

Watch the part of the "video" where they rotate the sunsimage cw top top bottom ("Oct12 1930 ) the spots stays a the 8:00 position where it first shows up but the sun image rotates. gotta be attached to the camera lens or filter not the sensor the sun
edit on 15-11-2010 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)

edit on 15-11-2010 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)

edit on 15-11-2010 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)

edit on 15-11-2010 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 10:54 PM
link   
you people and your imagenations, the black object in the video doesnt even appear to be filmed the same as the object, meaning the object was added as a layer on top of the video, meaning FAKE FAKE FAKE OH SO SUPER FAKE.



posted on Nov, 16 2010 @ 06:18 AM
link   
The only problem that I really have with the dust and dirt on the lens, is that back about a year ago I was told in space there is no dust or dirt floating around, So now throwing that out. Just what the heck is close to the sun?

But then I found this, yet it still does not explain what we can see figuring as small as a particle of dust that would be in space, Of course though maybe, the dust is trying to create a galaxy on the lens? :

Is there dust in space?:

Yes, that is what combines to form new stars, planets, and other objects. Dust and gas, actually. Normally the density of this dust and gas is extremely small; on average, less than the best vacuum that can be achieved on Earth, that is, less atoms per cubic centimeter. However, since this almost-vacuum is spread out over large regions of space, there is still considerable total mass involved, and sometimes it combines to form a new solar system, for example.



posted on Nov, 16 2010 @ 08:59 AM
link   
reply to post by captiva
 


Its probably a CCD or CMOS or whatever SDO uses glitch... not lenses... nice post tought



posted on Nov, 16 2010 @ 11:05 AM
link   
You know what is missing here ? Just another button to click "Yes I agree with the first hypothesis" or "No, I disagree with this hypothesis" (and maybe a case with the explanation of the Yes or No).

It seems we have two clans :

1/ Something wrong in the picture : mothership, planet X, alien... or I don't know what

2/ Something went wrong when the pictures were taken : space dust, lens anomally, hardware anomaly, or just a large CME anomally.


Maybe for the next answers on these topic, you should before arguyng (don't not the spelling) you should write a 1/ Agree or 2/ disagree and a small explanation.

And as I know so far, some people don't know, so I'll authorize them to put a 0/ for No position at all and also an explanation.

I'm working in an business intelligence school and I will be glad, at the end, to provide you an excel sheet with the answers, and an analysis.



posted on Nov, 16 2010 @ 03:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by Terviseks
You know what is missing here ? Just another button to click "Yes I agree with the first hypothesis" or "No, I disagree with this hypothesis" (and maybe a case with the explanation of the Yes or No).

It seems we have two clans :

1/ Something wrong in the picture : mothership, planet X, alien... or I don't know what

2/ Something went wrong when the pictures were taken : space dust, lens anomally, hardware anomaly, or just a large CME anomally.


Maybe for the next answers on these topic, you should before arguyng (don't not the spelling) you should write a 1/ Agree or 2/ disagree and a small explanation.

And as I know so far, some people don't know, so I'll authorize them to put a 0/ for No position at all and also an explanation.

I'm working in an business intelligence school and I will be glad, at the end, to provide you an excel sheet with the answers, and an analysis.


That added nothing. Could have been replaced with a blank page.



posted on Nov, 16 2010 @ 06:33 PM
link   
You cant speak in the vacuum dude



posted on Nov, 17 2010 @ 02:27 AM
link   
I just want to see the large picture of this thread. Are you afraid ? If you don't want to callaborate just don't do it...
2nd line.



posted on Nov, 17 2010 @ 03:28 AM
link   
I hate to be the bearer of bad tidings
and I do not know if anybody else
posted this already but there is NOT
just 1 object .... but 2 of them.

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/4e7ff003d2f4.jpg[/atsimg]

what has happened to all the pic and video
analyst that use to scrutinize images??
where have they gone? lol

edit for correction
edit on 11/17/2010 by boondock-saint because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 17 2010 @ 03:48 AM
link   
upon further review of the video.
It appears to me the image in those
photos is a camera malfunction.
At one point in the video, the sun
makes a clockwise rotation but the
image stayed in the very same
spot. If it was an actual object,
the object would have rotated
as well. It's a flaw.
You can drop ur bug out bags now



posted on Nov, 17 2010 @ 04:45 AM
link   

Originally posted by captiva
Interesting thread, especially the idea that there is dirt, dust or whatever on the lens or main capture sensor of the camera.

Now I dont know about the camera used to take the photographs, but i do know about still cameras.
Hense I stuck a piece of paper on a lens and took a couple of pics.


The SAM sensor on the EVE instrument is actually a pinhole camera with a CCD sensitive to X-Ray photons, so it does not have a lens. The artifact will be on the CCD and is probably just some dead pixels.


Originally posted by etcorngods
That added nothing. Could have been replaced with a blank page.


The sheer irony of you posting that, and that alone, is probably lost on you.


Originally posted by boondock-saint
upon further review of the video.
It appears to me the image in those
photos is a camera malfunction.
At one point in the video, the sun
makes a clockwise rotation but the
image stayed in the very same
spot. If it was an actual object,
the object would have rotated
as well. It's a flaw.
You can drop ur bug out bags now



Sadly I posted this on the first page and a couple of times since, but it appears to be lost on a special few.
Someone else also posted an image where it's washed out and there is no image, but the artifact is still present which shows even more clearly it is a fault with the CCD> Again, this was lost. Good luck anyway



posted on Nov, 17 2010 @ 07:54 AM
link   
yeah so...the majority called CCD?



posted on Nov, 18 2010 @ 07:21 AM
link   
Is the "Spot" still there???



posted on Nov, 18 2010 @ 08:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by etcorngods
Is the "Spot" still there???


exactly, if its a space dust particle it will stay there, no wind, gravity attraction
or if its a CCD error it will stay there, not possible to fix right now in deep space
so is it still there...?
if not it can only be a Unidentifyed Flying Object(s)

The arguement about the spot staying when the sun flips (i assume its assumend to be the camera making a 360 calibration or something) and the spot staying when the CCD fails to record a picture is a valid arguement but then again not 100% safeproof

anyway i downloaded another movie at the nasa soho site, when it downloads you can see each frame in the gif, but after a complete download it not possible to pause, the film is from 10 september to 11 november and is filled with something that looks like small (but huge the sun is megahuge) spacecrafts flying around it like sparks/fire flies, the sun seems to suddenly change in november, even move, or is it the sat??

take a look

gif movie remember to look at each frame while its loading







edit on 18-11-2010 by skywatch because: spells



posted on Nov, 18 2010 @ 11:13 AM
link   
Alternatively one could just view the entire archive with each individual frame available for download here, as I posted on the previous page:

lasp.colorado.edu...

The latest image at the time of writing is here, the dead pixels on the CCD are still there as one would expect:



The same way it was there months ago:




posted on Nov, 18 2010 @ 03:31 PM
link   
reply to post by skywatch
 


You are right -- looks like spacecraft flying around the surface of the SUN. UFO's are a joke by "GOD" (somewhat sick joke, if you will). Unidentified is a coded word, the first two letters of which are "UN" -- converts to 2010 AD -- this year.

Therefore the word Unidentified becomes "2010 AD Identified".

ATS seems to be one of the places where the miracles are being exposed. Writing on the Surface of the Sun, spacecrafts, spirals and pyramids in space and on the Sun, etc.

Expect lots more by the end of the year.

See my websites listed in my Profile.



new topics

top topics



 
60
<< 5  6  7    9 >>

log in

join