It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by OhZone
And that lilia brasilero or whatever it is can go too.
Originally posted by OptimistPrime
reply to post by louieprima
Obviously you didnt see what that report was compiled from. www.dogsbite.org... If you read the last part of the first paragraph, it clearly states it was compiled from (here's the important part) PRESS REPORTS. Hmm.... Math based of what the MSM gives you=Bad Math. I can find more to bust these myths than you can to support em. www.petsdo.com... This site here claims to have some clout in theirs but doesnt do anything to show you what its based on. Heres a link to some more credible sources. dogs.about.com... www.dogwatch.net... www.realpitbull.com...
answers.yahoo.com...
www.austinlostpets.com...
www.webanswers.com...
www.pbrc.net...
We can go on and on. Time for some of you to do some homework or just stop trying to troll lol.edit on 12-11-2010 by OptimistPrime because: wasnt finished
Originally posted by louieprima
Look, I live in inner city New Orleans. Pit Bulls are everywhere. And, yes, they are dangerous and violent dogs. There are 2 types of Pit Bull owners. One is much more dangerous to their community than the other. Here in NO we have a burgeoning class of Yankee hipster/yuppies. In many ways that's a good thing. But here are the 2 types of Pit Bull owners: Group A is comprised of dog fighters and wannabe gangsters. Group B is comprised of the afore-mentioned hipster/yuppie community. The dangerous Pit owners are Group B. This is because Group A knows what they have. They have dangerous animals that were specifically bred for aggression and to maximize damage to flesh. According to historical fact, Pit Bulls were bred by humans to inflict maximum damage for the purposes of gambling. Denying this is like saying that German Shepards were not bred to sheppard or protect. It's like saying that pointers were not bred for hunting. Pit Bulls were bred to fight other dogs and other animals and to inflict the maximum damage. They are only good for fighting or for protection. If you allow one of those animals to be around another pet or, esp, your kid, you should be disallowed from pet-owning or parenting. 9 pit bull attacks in our community in the last 9 months. If you think that the media has a conspiracy against pit bulls, you make the Reptilian people look smart. Those dogs should be bred out of existence. Google the Clifton Merritt Report and the CDC report, among others. It is a no-brainer for those who have brains -throughout history, and even pre-history,dogs were bred for specific purpose by HUMANS. ANd Pit Bulls were bred to rip, tear, and shred. It is their purpose
Originally posted by louieprima
Originally posted by OptimistPrime
reply to post by louieprima
Obviously you didnt see what that report was compiled from. www.dogsbite.org... If you read the last part of the first paragraph, it clearly states it was compiled from (here's the important part) PRESS REPORTS. Hmm.... Math based of what the MSM gives you=Bad Math. I can find more to bust these myths than you can to support em. www.petsdo.com... This site here claims to have some clout in theirs but doesnt do anything to show you what its based on. Heres a link to some more credible sources. dogs.about.com... www.dogwatch.net... www.realpitbull.com...
answers.yahoo.com...
www.austinlostpets.com...
www.webanswers.com...
www.pbrc.net...
We can go on and on. Time for some of you to do some homework or just stop trying to troll lol.edit on 12-11-2010 by OptimistPrime because: wasnt finished
I was not concerned about the website but the full report is difficult to find without a link. That was the first one I found. Instead of "trolling" yourself, or perhaps trying to defend your stance rather than looking at an issue rationally, you might actually read the full report as I suggest. The writer is an animal rights activist with no clear "anti-pit bull" agenda. He dissects several individual cases and has thrown out any case where there is any question of the dog's breed. That means many likely pit bull attacks were thrown out, so the numbers in the report are likely lowballed. Your "links" are not exactly indicative of "impartial" data. Forget the site. read the report. It is quite thorough and scientific and leaves little doubt of reality per the pit bull. Its a basic issue of sentimentality vs, sicence. I realize people love dogs but open your eyes, please.
Originally posted by Heyyo_yoyo
you've never owned a pitbull, so until you do you will spread disinfo and fear
epic fail
Originally posted by davespanners
Living in a bit of a rough area of London Staffies (Staffordshire Bull Terriers) are more or less the only type of dog I ever see, every teenager seems to have at least one.
I often look at these poor moronic inbred creatures walking around with dead eyes and tiny brains and can't help but feel sorry for their poor dogs.
edit on 10-11-2010 by davespanners because: (no reason given)