reply to post by bezerker
These two off-topic posts above by beserker are prime examples of a lack of decorum by what I will call the "true believers" who have to bring their
tired arguments into any thread they care to. No, this isn't incivility per se; however, the act of hijacking a thread from its intended topic, to
his/her pet views is still inappropriate, and many would also call it rude. In any case it's certainly inconsiderate, and should be dealt with as
strongly as one is dealing with rude behavior if the health of the forum is the point.
For example, in the notorious/epic "Show Me Just One Piece of Evidence of an ET UFO" (or whatever it is called), one poster goes on for several
pages worth of the thread on how he/she is a reptilian or some such thing, and adds nothing to the discussion of the OP. This is annoying and rude to
me, as I find offensive: people wasting my time. Frankly, I'd call this trolling, although many of the true believers called the OP a troll, even
though his challenge to the community was a legitimate one. Seems true believers calling legitimate skeptics trolls is about as rude as a skeptic or
debunker calling a commenter or thread creator a dingle-berry for bringing up some long-discredited meme or citation, or showing some very dodgy video
or picture.
And with respect to the OP, I, as a UFO agnostic/skeptic, was put off by the complaint that skeptics and debunkers are the primary source of
incivility in this forum. Besides the type of inconsiderateness described above, I've seen plenty of painting of skeptics and debunkers (S&D) as
narrow-minded purveyors of swamp gas and weather balloons, along with rudeness on par with what some skeptics and debunkers dishout. By the OP
addressing the criticism at a particular viewpoint demographic, the opposing viewpoint gains unwarranted vindication/validity -- and is plain
inequitable. This is why the OP has taken a lot of heat from the S&D contingent, and why a lot of this thread has tread away from the main issue of
reaffirming the importance of civility -- and I would add decorum/considerateness.
Related to all this, but certainly tangential, is this thought: given the tens of thousands of threads in the A/UFO Forum, and the way new threads are
made on old topics because most people don't have the wherewithal to check before unknowingly creating a new, but redundant thread -- and some people
are just too lazy to check even a little -- and a goodly segment of the forum readership is tired of sensationally titled new threads and threads with
some dubious YouTube footage or its like, couldn't there be an alternative forum for more serious (perhaps even scientific) UFO
investigation/research, in order to sort the wheat from the chaff, so to speak?
For example, I, for one, do not want to ever read another post or thread about ancient cave paintings and such as being proof positive of visitation
by ETs. Sure, people ought to be able to regurgitate this stuff ad naseum in some forum, but more discerning folk don't want to devote another
photon-neuron interaction to such matters. And frankly, most anyone still writing on this topic has nothing new to add to the conversation.
Separating the forum into a more objective one and a more speculative/subjective one would make for less friction/annoyance and hence less cause for
tempers to flare and manners to deteriorate.
As it is now, the most highly viewed threads -- i.e. the most readily accesible/viewable ones -- are the usual suspects, most of which I would
consider to be inconsequential to serious/objective UFO researchers/aficionados. This leads to a feedback/response system that goes ever more towards
noise, rather than useful information. Creating two paradigms of UFO/Alien forum boards would breath new life into the more serious/objective
discussion of the topic.