posted on Nov, 7 2010 @ 04:54 PM
While it is true that humans, for the most part, have shown ourselves to be destructive and predatory at the societal level, we also tend to
assimilate our neighbors without much bloodshed. And, with every war, more and more people have come to see brutality as excessive. When the Spanish
plundered Hispaniola, Fray Bartolome de las Casas bore witness to the atrocities carried out against the Arawak stating that "millions" had been
dwindled down to almost nothing. He also noted the destruction of the forests on what would become Haiti and the Dominican Republic. I would say that
the Arawak and the forests of Hispaniola were intertwined and could not be separated, something that the Spanish had, through becoming an Empire, lost
except for the smallest backwaters on the Iberian Peninsula. Empire had already risen and fallen so many times on that Peninsula, the Spanish were a
product of atrocities.
From here, let's zoom forward to Brazilian thinker Paulo Freire and his Pedagogy of the Oppressed, where he states that in the brutality of
oppression, the oppressed - when given the chance - become the oppressors, treating those who oppressed them, and eventually their compatriots, in the
same fashion they were once treated. We see this on the human-to-human level when a person who is abused, sexually or otherwise, may see fit to do the
same once that person is in a position of power over another. It is only logical to take this to the next step and see that, at the social level, the
same possibilities exist en masse.
As far as potential visiting travelers, I think we could probably expect somewhat similar actions. This opinion stems from evolutionary tendencies on
our planet. I can only assume that evolution would be carried out in a similar Darwinian framework, no matter the basic elements of a given planet.
So, any species that ends up following the social path that eventually leads to space exploration, by whatever means available, would most likely have
gone through similar trials and tribulations as the human race:
1. All animals make use of relevant objects in their surroundings (Uexkull's Umwelt)
2. Humans directly manipulated their surrounding objects (as for making tools, building shelter)
3. As semiotic beings, Humans created a form of supra-individual communication ability (language)
4. The next step was the expanding of that communication system to totally flout time itself (writing)
In the process of these developments, we have had moments of awe, when we have realized that what we have done (as a specific group generally - such
as the Spanish, or the Germans, or the Americans at this moment and so on) were not fruitful but for a few people running the show. This goes back to
Freire, in that most people living in Empire, soon realize what that means at a personal level, even if they never see the battlefields, the
battlefield mentality eventually hits home (surveillance state, terrorist-driven paranoia, etc.).
When the aliens finally get here, they may want us for food, or just resources, but make no mistake, they want something. You don't leave your planet
without totally consuming your resources at home and most likely the resources belonging to someone else. At any rate, my hope would be that at some
point during a predatory alien species's intergalactic resource grab, their consciousness would be affected by a similar de las Casas or Freire or
Hawking.
How it will all play out depends greatly upon whether we become their Americas, their Waterloo, their Afghanistan, or their --insert eventual analogy
yet to be realized by a future Empire whose empire-building leads to their own distruction. One thing I know for sure, they won't be Buddhists -
Buddhists would probably never leave their planet, because it kind of negates the whole "being present" thing. You can't be present if you are
removing mountain tops and destroying the sea floor to construct a space program cum military-industrial complex.
**I would normally proof-read a long post like this to fix there/their/they're style issues or pleonasms that come from pretty much straight-forward
thought-to-keyboard action, but I have to run out now, so be kind on the grammar nitpickiness.