very clear night pyramid over turkey up-loaded nov 5

If it's a B52, please state what business a B52 has flying over Turkey.

great footage but i have to admit what would the benefit be for a pyramid shape aircraft?
unless the point was always pointing in the direction it was flying...it would be a very crappy design.

reply to post by QuantumDeath


because there is an air force base there and serves as a great refueling and rearming point for any bomber. just to let you know.

Originally posted by mackblack27
reply to post by XPLodER

 

looks like a Goa'uld mothership......
Soon as we power up the ancient weapons platform in antartica we will low them out of the sky

interesting idea
why build a floating city unless its a perminent residence
something this size would require alot of power
looking at the size of the lights it does look to be a very far distence away
how would you build a city sized ship?

xp

My initial gut reaction was that this seemed CGI-ish, but I can't say this for certain.

Nor can I back it up in any way. So I'll just go back & read over the thread to see what ATS thinks about it.

Frames 798 to 803 appear to have the outline of a hill at the level of, and above the object. There are two lights. They are only there for 5 frames. This could well be an illuminated building - the lights being at ground level shining up.

At all times the object does not move in relation to it's background and other objects. Not even the slightest bit.

May be it is some sort of temporary display and thus not recognised by the person videoing it. CGI it certainly is NOT.

[1] Laughing at the object?

Ok so what do almost all MSM do when reporting a UFO?

Yes they giggle, even Miko Kaku talks about the giggle factor with reporting & talking of UFO sigtings, i think stating this is fake because of the laughing involved is totally irrelevant,

[2] triangle craft being impossible & dumb for ET

Well considering this... the Horton flying wing, the B2 & the stealth bomber.

Horton Wing


All of which are triangle shaped craft, now lets go back to the Horton Bomber designed by the germans in WWII to bomb targets in the USA Hitler wanted to bomb new york and this was the craft to do it, it run up again all sorts of problems with its aerodynamics it wasn't stable in flyte all sorts of problems thos who no about the Horton flying wing/bomber should know the other reasons,

Now lets push forward to the end of WWII when all germanys much higher tech by a factor of 10yrs more advanced in all fields of military hardware was plundered by the russian americans & british, this is the tech that took the US to the moon, and lets not forget the bell project, hmm i wonder what happened with that...

So what was needed & found out about this design, LOTS its radar signiture is next to nothing thats a big big plus for an aircraft trying to avoid radar detection, and so the US devoloped its own Triangle/boomerang shaped craft, but the only way that shape would be stable in flyte would to mean putting computers onboard making adjustments to keep it in the air not to mention the thing did not want to land with its huge span,

B2



Lets take it a step fether & add antigravity drives to the mix, ET to travel hear would need to have some really good tech, i don't see why they probably being thusands of years more advanced had not concoured gravity, the sort of tech WE are trying to concour today, now with an antigravity drive aerodynamics would mean F all, saying the shape of this object is impossible or trying to debunk it through its shape is a really dumb thing to say, with an antigrav drive you could put a box in the air, you can't just look at these sort of sightings with a single minded view you can't think well because its impossible for that shape to fly ET thousands of years more advanced can't do it either, when in actual fact we can, and im pretty dam sure they could aswel

ET or Ours?

The fotage sems good, but i am getting ever more skeptical these days, the footage is getting oddly better with thse ongoing UFO footage.

Some of them like the other china pyramid one had an interesting debunking video too, in this day n age i think its quite easy to edit footage.

Also after seeing the diminisehd reality software, that enables live footage being edited with exceptional quality unable to be detected by the naked eye on high quality video footage, i think that footage like this is able to be reproduced using cgi, with little cost and effort.

Also im not sure about the laughing in the video, maybe they are joking about something or not, it would be good to have a translation too, another main point is the small amount of recording.

Something like this would be recorded adn told about by everyone, people would phone neighbours and ask others to also rcord from different angles. Also they would be sitting there recording all night long if they thought it was some sort of real alien ET aircraft.

Thatbeing said, if it is real, then it remains unidentified, so i guess it can be clarified as a ufo. But as an alien craft, im really not sure. Seems way too good a footage to be true...

Awesome to watch though no doubt! very peculiar and an iincredile recording or cgi w/e it is.

reply to post by PuterMan


i am still open to this being a hilltop lit up with lights
but the guy that filmed it has the correct responce and amazment
there is something strange to all this
on page 4 is a break down to what was said in the footage
this seams legit at this point

xploder

Originally posted by Anthony1138
interseting. CGI never ceases to amaze me, no offence to any alien race that would use triangle shape ships, but it would be a flawed design to travel through hyperspace. It is a hoax simply a hoax, much like the triangle ship seen over china, that was a hoax too.

its like many people are just trying to fool others to believe in silly things, i do believe in aliens (we are aliens to someone else) but they arent interseted in us, we are primtive small, stupid, greedy and incredbilly gulible, we are no interset.

Just like you fool yourself into believing that you actually know it is a 'hoax'.

"It is a hoax, simply a hoax"

Please...
You do not know, Why pretend like you do?
You're only fooling yourself.
Whatever helps you sleep at night.

Deny what?>

reply to post by nastyj

You'll find the translation on page four.

Originally posted by QuantumDeath
If it's a B52, please state what business a B52 has flying over Turkey.

What business? Turkey is a NATO nation. Turkey hosts US nuclear free fall weapons with Turkish F-16s being dual-keyed on those tactical nuclear weapons as part of NATO duty.

The USAF has bases in Turkey as part of NATO.

www.incirlik.af.mil...

The USAF strategic bomber fleet still fly Global Reach missions and NATO still assist them with airspace usage. Nothing out of the ordinary for such US strategic bombers to utilise NATO airspace.

TJ

Originally posted by XPLodER
reply to post by PuterMan

 

i am still open to this being a hilltop lit up with lights
but the guy that filmed it has the correct responce and amazment
xploder

Oh don't get me wrong, I am not saying the footage is not genuine because it definitely is. Consider this. During the day a marquee is put up on the hill top. At some point in the evening the lights are turned on. Yes the voices would sound amazed - and they do.

This however does not make it an UFO much as I would like it to be, and those 5 frames are the give-away as far as I can see since there is a clear outline of a hill and this object would appear to rest naturally within that curve.

I am also thinking that if this was UFO of any sort then even if 'hovering' there would be some detectable movement against the foreground/background but I have single stepped though all 3000+ frames and that object never varies its position.

Oh dear god, it's the Goa'uld ! Better get sg-1 on the case

Seriously though, that is one freaky video :O

Peace !

reply to post by PuterMan


your conclusion is correct as far as i can tell
this object stays in exactly the same place the whole time
at some point some one metioned rotatation of the object which should preclude a fixed tent hill top excetra
i have not ruled out a illuminated hill top
but the rotaion thing makes it less likely

xploder

OK so if its a B52
Why is there NO SOUND? have you heard thos things there probably the loudest thing in the sky LOL Oh and why is it stationary? That it is certainly not!

On the hill tops?
Thats possible but it could also be a UFO landed or hovering over the mounting tops, id guess thats why they are filming it, i take it they had never seen it there before,

I really wish people would say when they do not know what the object is instead of making a really bad guess to then go away with there answer, UFO believers are gullible?, i think its the other way round tbh

reply to post by XPLodER


Well I have to say that stepping frame by frame I can discern no rotation.

If you want to do this yourself get Format Factory and convert the FLV to MPG. The run it through Virtual Dub at 300% size frame by frame.

Dont get me wrong i love a nice alien-UFO story as the next guy but sometimes you cant always read or look at a video or picture and believe its true so im going say its a fake

reply to post by PuterMan


thank you for the info and the links
please look at the left hand side of the object
it is illuminated from the moon
why is the ground under the object not illuminated as well
i will re watch the footage and see if the lights are blinking in order to make it look like it is rotating
or weather it was just something said by the observers

thank you
xploder

reply to post by PuterMan


You can indeed see the faint outline of the hill top highest on the left sloping to the right, what would be the two very bright objects to the right of the triangle?

The flashing light to the left seems to be on the top of the peak but the triangle lower
@0:40s there is another quick flash inberteen both of thos objects/lights,

but still i don't know what it is, it could very well be an Illigal Rave? but i wouldn't put money on it

Can someone point me to the translation?