It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
...then there's you conspiracy people...
Us: "We have proven Dylan Avery and David Ray Griffin are lying"
You: "Yeah, but it's an inside job by the gov't to stage a false flag operation"
Us: "but we have proven it would require an astronomical amount of resources for it to be an inside job"
You: "Yeah, but it's an inside job by the gov't to stage a false flag operation"
Us: "We have shown the gov't is too disorganized to pull off any such complex conspiracy'
You: "Yeah, but it's an inside job by the gov't to stage a false flag operation"
Us: "Despite what the gov't did or didn't do in the past, these conspiracy claims still make no sense"
You: "Nah, you're just a secret gov't disinformation agent. It's an inside job by the gov't to stage a false flag operation"
The question should therefore really be, "Would YOU accept, 'To Kill a Mockingbird' justice"? Up until now, you obviously are.
Originally posted by snapperski
the world is screaming for a full public independent international inquiry,
Originally posted by airspoon
The theory that 19 cave-dwelling Arabs
Originally posted by dereks
Originally posted by snapperski
the world is screaming for a full public independent international inquiry,
They are? Care to provide proof of that claim?
What most truthers refuse to accept is that with their silly conspiracy theories of:
beam weapons, holographic planes, mini nukes, nanoo nanoo thermite, hush a boom explosives and the old standby, THE JEWS DID IT etc etc. they have zero credibility in the real world!
Originally posted by snapperski
,and all the evidence was removed from the crime scene in amazeing speed,never to be seen again.
Originally posted by GrinchNoMore
You have lied at least 55,000 times on this site,
“During my 33 years as a research physicist at the Naval Research Laboratory, it was my great joy to be able to contribute to the advancement of science without the slightest interference by NRL officials. So I was sickened to read in David Ray Griffin’s assiduously researched book of unequivocal evidence for massive scientific fraud committed by a politicized NIST. I implore President Obama to end the subversion of science at NIST and open a new, unfettered, investigation of the 9/11 attacks.” —David L. Griscom, Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science and of the American Physical Society.
"Based on my engineering knowledge and experience, I fully agree with Dr. Griffin's conclusion that NIST’s report on the collapse of WTC 7 is pseudo-science, containing claims that are misleading and even outright false. Numerous contradictions exposed by outside experts during the public review process were completely ignored, because they did not fit NIST’s contrived explanation.” —Jack Keller, Fellow of the American Society of Civil Engineers; member of the National Academy of Engineering
“A definitive study of what happens when political concerns are permitted to override science and the scientific method. With intellectual finesse worthy of a scientist, Griffin shows that NIST’s WTC 7 report has no scientific credibility. A must read for all concerned with the restoration of science to its ‘rightful place’ in our democracy.”—John D. Wyndham, Ph.D., Physics, Cambridge University; former Research Fellow at the California Institute of Technology
Originally posted by airspoon
The simple and sad fact of the matter, is that we don't know what happened on that day and therein lies the problem. Nobody knows with any certainty what happened, as there has been a crystal clear effort to obfuscate the truth. OSers or official conspiracy theorists base their entire belief on "the word" of government, a government that has been caught [red-handed] lying on several occasions. Whatever the case and whatever side of the fence you sit on, you simply don't know for a fact what happened or who did it, as there is a clear effort to keep thatproof under wraps, ultimately sewing suspicion on those obfuscating.
--airspoon