It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Dantas
Originally posted by FoosM
Im sorry, but the US has become officially the "bad guy"
the "evil Empire". And the people they are fighting, are the "rebels".
And I was under the impression all along the Empire were the good guys and the Rebels were the bad guys. Let's see, it started with the Senate which is like the UN. Everyone has a representative there but nothing gets acomplished due to the bureaucracy. The Emperor wanted to break up the Senate (UN) and allow each system to govern themselves albeit with him as a dictator but a benign dictator who's forces collect taxes and keep peace and order in the galaxy from organized crime and war and who promotes free trade and capitolism. Kind of like the President of the United States. So you are saying that America is the Empire which is absolutely correct and that is a good thing. The Rebels are those who wish for the UN as the head of a NWO. I'll take the Empire any day.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by airspoon
"The method, which most describe as torture, has since been banned by the Justice Department."
"Since been" implies to me that at the time he approved it there was no Justice Department stance against the practice. hindsight is always 20/20, but I cannot affirm here that if faced with the same proposition from the CIA I wouldn't have agreed to it also.
If I were told lives could be saved by torturing a criminal, for the sake of the lives that could be saved I'd be inclined to do the same. But I admit that's conjecture at this point. I dunno, hard decision to make.
Originally posted by DuceizBack
Wow
it's #ing war..
too many damn liberals
if world war 3 breaks out i hope all the liberals be quiet....
Originally posted by airspoon
reply to post by pscysm
Sometimes you have to do what you abhore to do the right thing. That's why it takes strength to stay the course and not be swayed by public opinion.
Therein lies the problem. You see, the USA is supposed to be a Democratic Republic, which means that our politicians need to listen to the people. Somewhere along the line (recently), that notion has been lost on the American people. The public is being indoctrinated to believe otherwise.
They work for us, at least that is supposed to be how it works, not the other way around. In despotic dictatorships, the "president" has the authority to stay the course, in spite of popular public opinion and in that case, freedom is absent. Without public opinion driving policy, we don't have a government "of", "by" and "for" the people and we might as well crumple our Constitution and throw it away.
Sadly, far too many people are all too willing to delegate their critical self thinking skills out to people who are only looking out for their own best interests, even when it conflicts or contradicts their own. The truth is, we are government and we decide policy and until that is realized once again, we will continue to be taken advantage of and the idea of "freedom" is only a buzz-word card, designed to give the illusion that the American dream is still out there. Our founding fathers would be absolutely and justifiably ashamed.
--airspoonedit on 5-11-2010 by airspoon because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by airspoon
There we have it, a confession to war crimes, though I doubt that any justice will ever be served.
If he's guilty of war crimes then so is everyone who knew about it before it happened and as it was happening, including Nancy Pelosi. Obama approved torture overseas. If you charge Bush43 then Obama's gotta' be charged as well. We'd sure empty out DC if we were to go through and weed those folks out. Hmmm .. might be a good idea.
Anyways, at least he owns it. Unlike others who push it off and lie saying they knew nothing about it only to be exposed as a liar later.(Pelosi).
Originally posted by CommonSensation
Unbelievable! GWB ordered water be poured onto the face of a known enemy plotting mass attacks on the United States of America! What a monster! We should hang this asshole right now, how dare the former leader of our country act in such a way that would result in critical intelligence being gathered that could possibly save American lives!
I'm just glad we finally have someone in office currently that takes pride in protecting this country, dramatically improving the economoy, creating vital jobs for all Americans, and has reduced our national debt...
Oh wait...
Originally posted by Informativeme
Torture is an effective method of interrogation.
Originally posted by jfj123
Originally posted by Informativeme
Torture is an effective method of interrogation.
This is absolutely not true. Even the people who did the interrogations stated as much.
Next time read up before you post such blatantly false dribble.
Originally posted by aptness
It’s completely legitimate to disagree and to have difference of opinion but why do so many people engage in labeling others as ‘liberals,’ ‘America bashers’ or ‘terrorist sympathizers’
Originally posted by Darkrunner
I think people need to wake up and realize what REAL torture is. Hot or cold rooms, loud music, pouring water on someones face is not REAL torture.
Capt. Berryman, a Marine pilot during the first Gulf War knows what REAL torture is. He was shot down after Iraq invaded Kuwait. I met the man once in North Carolina at Cherry Point Marine Corps Air Station in the early 90's.
Look up his story. I would wager having your legs shattered with a lead pipe fits my definition of what REAL torture is.
Originally posted by Donkey_Dean
Oh, torture is very effective! You just gotta know what buttons to push.
As a rule, torture is not an effective method of extracting information from prisoners, most experts agree.
"If anything useful came out these interrogations in Iraq, we would have heard about it," said Alfred McCoy, a University of Wisconsin-Madison historian and author of "A Question of Torture: CIA Interrogation, From the Cold War to the War on Terror" (Holt Paperbacks, 2006).
A switch from more physical methods of torture to the psychological approaches emerged in the following decades in places such as Vietnam, Central America and Iran, McCoy said, without any definitive proof of their effectiveness.
The CIA inspector general in 2004 found that there was no conclusive proof that waterboarding or other harsh interrogation techniques helped the Bush administration thwart any “specific imminent attacks,” according to recently declassified Justice Department memos.
Originally posted by Darkrunner
I think people need to wake up and realize what REAL torture is. Hot or cold rooms, loud music, pouring water on someones face is not REAL torture.
Capt. Berryman, a Marine pilot during the first Gulf War knows what REAL torture is. He was shot down after Iraq invaded Kuwait. I met the man once in North Carolina at Cherry Point Marine Corps Air Station in the early 90's.
Look up his story. I would wager having your legs shattered with a lead pipe fits my definition of what REAL torture is.