34 warships sent from US for Obama visit

reply to post by PatriotsPride



OK. My heart tells me he is meeting with Star Nations somewhere in India. Not in Mumbai and Delhi for sure as this type of meetings are kept 'above top secret'. Wake up!!! Use your heart instead of your mind. Your heart will always speak the truth. Disclosure is eminent and will happen before the year is over. This is it!!

Why the heck do you need so many warships?? There is no threat from our beloved Star Visitors. It is us Humans who are scared full of fear and with a big ego. Where is the love?

Peace to All of You.

I agree. I think it's either 1 of 2 things: DISCLOSURE OF UFOS or ANNOUNCEMENT OF NEW FINANCIAL SYSTEM!!!!

Dave Bowman was right... Something Wonderful is about to happen!!!!

Pretty sure this all has been debunked by now. But golly, keep the theories and rumors flowing. They're entertaining to say the least.

reply to post by PatriotsPride


The whole premise of this thread, although widely disseminated amongst the various lying s.o.s. teabagger and phony "patriot" websites is completely debunked by ABC news along with many other sources that make a point of sticking to reality, not teabagger fantasyland:

blogs.abcnews.com...

While Obama and his globalist elite overlords are busy looting America day by day, he pampers himself like some king, diverting U.S. naval power to protect him?

Obama is staying on dry land while using ships to protect him?

reply to post by ljtg123
Hi, I already posted this tunnel news about three pages ago. I don't most the posters on this thread are interested in real news. Then I googled the ships thing and found a statement released from the Pentagon. Seems most people here don't want to believe the DOD/Pentagon news release that this 34 or 36 ships is not true. Not that I believe whatever the gov't says...lol. But there is also a site posted in this thread showing the location, deployment, etc. of our ships. And no one can show what ships are supposedly headed for India. Anyway, thanks for your post on the tunnel. I do think this tunnel thing is interesting. Here's my article from a different site, if you're interested.

bunkerville.wordpress.com...

Originally posted by galactictuan
I agree. I think it's either 1 of 2 things: DISCLOSURE OF UFOS or ANNOUNCEMENT OF NEW FINANCIAL SYSTEM!!!!

Dave Bowman was right... Something Wonderful is about to happen!!!!

Calm down, nothings about to happen. This is all bunk. Proven bunk in fact

Originally posted by stanats
reply to post by PatriotsPride

 

The whole premise of this thread, although widely disseminated amongst the various lying s.o.s. teabagger and phony "patriot" websites is completely debunked by ABC news along with many other sources that make a point of sticking to reality, not teabagger fantasyland:

blogs.abcnews.com...

How exactly this has been debunked? Because Pentagone said so?

You think if they were to attack Iran, they would have said : "Yeah, we need a lot of them, we want to attack Iran"?

Only the fact that they did discuss about such security requests makes this "trip" even more suspect. When do they discuss about president security? Never. Why now? Why would they say they don't have such, why?

Where are the 37 warships on "training"?

Why would Obama go over there if this is so dangerous for his safety?

That "trip" smells.

I believe another poster already stated this, but it just struck me again while reading about this trip on reuters...why the hell is he going to Indonesia right now? I would think all the eruptions and earthquakes would make for considerable security issues. I dunno, maybe he's going to a completely un-effected area, but still.

It'd be like going to a "Mini-Haiti" to talk shop while instability rattles the nation. That's how my warped brain perceives this.

reply to post by Esger


There is an ENTIRE THREAD DEBUNKING THIS THAT I SUPPLIED A LINK TO ON THE LAST PAGE.

I hope that helps.

I didn't see this point posted in this thread:

here's link:

www.whitehouse.gov...www.whitehouse.gov... order-succession-within-department-justice

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary
For Immediate Release
November 04, 2010
Executive Order--Order of Succession Within the Department of Justice

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998, 5 U.S.C. 3345 et seq., it is hereby ordered that:

Section 1. Order of Succession. Subject to the provisions of section 2 of this order, the following officers, in the order listed, shall act as and perform the functions and duties of the office of Attorney General, during any period in which the Attorney General, the Deputy Attorney General, the Associate Attorney General, and any officers designated by the Attorney General pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 508 to act as Attorney General have died, resigned, or otherwise become unable to perform the functions and duties of the office of Attorney General, until such time as at least one of the officers mentioned above is able to perform the functions and duties of that office:

(a) United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia;

(b) United States Attorney for the District of Minnesota; and

(c) United States Attorney for the District of Arizona.

Sec. 2. Exceptions. (a) No individual who is serving in an office listed in section 1 of this order in an acting capacity, by virtue of so serving, shall act as Attorney General pursuant to this order.

(b) No individual listed in section 1 shall act as Attorney General unless that individual is otherwise eligible to so serve under the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998.

(c) Notwithstanding the provisions of this order, the President retains discretion, to the extent permitted by law, to depart from this order in designating an acting Attorney General.

Sec. 3. Executive Order 13481 of December 9, 2008, is revoked.

Sec. 4. This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity, by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

BARACK OBAMA

THE WHITE HOUSE,
November 4, 2010.

Originally posted by Curiousisall
reply to post by Esger

 

There is an ENTIRE THREAD DEBUNKING THIS THAT I SUPPLIED A LINK TO ON THE LAST PAGE.

I hope that helps.

Yeah, I did read this thread. They talk about five Aircraft Carriers.

1- We're talking about 34 warships.
2- I don't think they would put such security/secret infos on their website.

If you think it's debunk because Pentagone said so, i'm happy for you.

reply to post by teacup27


This link is in the thread.. somewhere

Originally posted by Esger

Originally posted by Curiousisall
reply to post by Esger

 

There is an ENTIRE THREAD DEBUNKING THIS THAT I SUPPLIED A LINK TO ON THE LAST PAGE.

I hope that helps.

Yeah, I did read this thread. They talk about five Aircraft Carriers.

1- We're talking about 34 warships.
2- I don't think they would put such security/secret infos on their website.

If you think it's debunk because Pentagone said so, i'm happy for you.

Yeah maybe you should go back, click on the thread I supplied and read it this time. Kind of sounds like you did not even look at the right thread at all from this. But if you want to believe something is true because some foreign newspaper says so, I am happy for you.

If you believe that this trip is costing more per day than the entire operation in Afghanistan does per day, I am really happy for you.

for some unknown reason
which I have no idea why

but the name Archduke Ferdinand
comes to mind right about now.
hmmmm

the fact remains, whether the ships 'just happen to be stopping by' ... or are heading there intentionally --- The thing is this: There's a lot of action going on, and as usual 'they' are trying to debunk that 'anything' beyond the norm is going on.

The fact also remains that the administration is spending money like a drunken sailor.

Hopefully more details will be released about the breakdown of expenditures. I agree he must be protected, but this is a bit extreme ... as is everything this admin does! It's really all like a sci-fi movie since O was elected. One nightmare after another.

Even if monetary figures are wrong, rental of the complete Taj Mahal for such a large entourage, the underground tunnel, it's all just so .. soo much.

Also, is there any confirmation of the previous post about the fed reserve guys heading off the Jekyll Island? Is that true -- has it been allegedly debunked.

And even if all of this is NOT true ... why is it all hitting the media, when they control the media ....????
Like it was accidentally leaked.

And why is he going to such a dangerous place 'just' after the election, and where in the heck is Joe?

From This post

2 DAYS AGO

"The United States has deployed its fourth submarine in the Persian Gulf region following the deployment of three others near the Bahrain Port.


This comes as the USS Abraham Lincoln and French Charles de Gaulle aircraft carriers are heading toward the region.

The United States maintains twenty combat vessels, namely the USS Harry Truman aircraft carrier, as well as fifty-three logistical vessels, in the Persian Gulf and the Sea of Oman.

A total of thirty combat vessels are currently deployed in the region, including those belonging to Britain and France.

The USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier with 5,000 crew members, including sailors and pilots, has entered the territory of the US Fifth Fleet.

Abraham Lincoln is accompanied by USS Cape St. George and battlecruisers as well as four destroyers.

Link

Originally posted by PatriotsPride

34 warships sent from US for Obama visit

www.ndtv.com

He will also be protected by a fleet of 34 warships, including an aircraft carrier witch will patrol the sea lanes off the Mumbai coast during his two day stay there beginning Saturday.The measure has been taken as Mumbai attack in 2008 took place from the sea.

(visit the link for the full news article)

TOTAL BS THAT MICHELLE BACHMAN IS SPREADING..MY GOD MAN GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT..

reply to post by PatriotsPride
I've been thinking about my reply to this thread. My post included a link to an article about the tunnel they are building in India for Obama's visit. Although both the 34 warships and tunnel are related to his India visit, my tunnel article isn't really related directly to the OP's post on the warships. So, I guess it's off topic and I want to apologize for posting it. I suppose because they are both related to the visit, nothing entered my head that it would be off topic to the warships. So, I am sorry for in any way taking the OP's thread in a wrong direction. My bad.

reply to post by platipus


Maybe thats why hes going!