Did somebody just try to buy the British government?

reply to post by PriamsPride


I mentioned it Priams and also considered it to be a real contender however:

Originally posted by thoughtsfull
...especially now it is said that Foundation X are effectively on the Gold Standard (c1920s) and have been amassing their fortune for over 100 years (again this dating does put a damper on it being the OITC as even their claimed lifespan is only 60-70 years old)

Is the truth and so we must rule them out (As the entity they officially exist as at least).

-m0r

Did somebody just try to buy the British government?
---

Yuk. The only selling point within Britain is kissing too much American butts. Most of their Newspapers front page something about the U.S..
BBC pm, same sort of deal. I love our American friends but gosh, I don't live their life and expect they wish not to live within mine and in most cases my Country. One century they want to take over your Country. The next century, they need your help with that German guy. Now we're talking buying Britain--trash.

I've never been to London but for many years had a relationship with an English woman. The best Lady I've ever known. The sky (in any detail) was never a limit. God bless their Queen.

Decoy

reply to post by m0r1arty


Aside from the OITC who do you feel it might be?

My thoughts are this org is not well known to the City bankers, or the UK Gov. they are said to have been amassing their wealth for over 100 years, are on the gold standard, they have a chairman (that acts like some bloody royal) have no intent on managing the cash they are injecting (in fact seem to have no interest on where it goes) and are happy to inject the cash into hospitals, schools etc (seems more like PR to me)

I would lean towards an altruistic religious org, but the 100 year things blows a hole in that theory.. any of the usual suspects (Rothchilds) but since X is not well known to the City or UK gov that blows a hole in that theory. again the same can be said about any nation state (e.g China) I am almost left like a Sherlock Holmes novel excluding all the probabilities, the possibilities and only being left with absurdities, like some organisation (masonic, illuminati, etc) coming out from the shadows.

Just to throw my tuppence worth on to the pile, we're looking at this from our perspective. We're talking about people with noble titles, with heads of state and big business on speed dial. If this were any of the big players, they are all already known entities at these levels, and there wouldn't have been such a lengthy amount of time involved in checking credentials. All the names mentioned as suggestions above already have enough fingers in enough pies that getting getting taken seriously just isn't a problem.

That suggests to me that we're either dealing with a new player, or we've been shown a piece of theatre, and this hansard transcript is really a "Once Upon a Time" opening.

reply to post by thoughtsfull


There are only a few possibilities who would content to have amassed that much wealth but all of them are well known to regulatory bodies, masonic leaders and businesses. If such wealth existed it would devalue all existing wealth ergo they would be taken out of this mortal realm.

I conclude that Lord James is being played as some sort of confidence trick or distraction from a more menacing threat which will not be apparent to the general populous.

Who knows though - we'll have to see what more there is to all of this.

-m0r

Originally posted by TheIrvy
Just to throw my tuppence worth on to the pile, we're looking at this from our perspective. We're talking about people with noble titles, with heads of state and big business on speed dial. If this were any of the big players, they are all already known entities at these levels, and there wouldn't have been such a lengthy amount of time involved in checking credentials. All the names mentioned as suggestions above already have enough fingers in enough pies that getting getting taken seriously just isn't a problem.

That suggests to me that we're either dealing with a new player, or we've been shown a piece of theatre, and this hansard transcript is really a "Once Upon a Time" opening.

Quite, but if this was a "once upon a time" then it certainly feels like the peer in question will find himself in a nice padded room soon enough tho I personally would expect that from a hereditary peer, not a life peer.

The game is afoot

Disclosure.. I for one am thoroughly enjoying this little bit of detective work

Originally posted by m0r1arty
reply to post by thoughtsfull

 

There are only a few possibilities who would content to have amassed that much wealth but all of them are well known to regulatory bodies, masonic leaders and businesses. If such wealth existed it would devalue all existing wealth ergo they would be taken out of this mortal realm.

I conclude that Lord James is being played as some sort of confidence trick or distraction from a more menacing threat which will not be apparent to the general populous.

Who knows though - we'll have to see what more there is to all of this.

-m0r

Great points.. I just can not help but wonder on this one.. the kicker for me is the "bullion" remark.. I mean, how would disclosure of this extra bullion help, wouldn't it simply drive down the value of gold? (perhaps that is the con, drive down the price of gold?)

And if this is capital was invested some where else in the world wouldn't that then mean some where else would be a lot worse off than they are now?

Unless that is the point, shift capital from a part of the world that Foundation X sees under threat into bricks and mortar of some where safer.. say on an Island?

Or as you say this is a confidence game being played on an old man..

reply to post by thoughtsfull


I like the fact that you feel like Sherlock Holmes...See my username?

Lord James does seem to have put his neck out a great deal and he's got a good background in fraud and finances.

I really think there will be more to this tale before next week is through.

-m0r

reply to post by PriamsPride


That was my first thought, but apparently Lord James has ruled them out...

James told ZDNet UK that he had not been approached by the UNOITC, and that there were no links between Foundation X and UNOITC.

www.zdnet.co.uk...

Originally posted by m0r1arty
reply to post by thoughtsfull

 

I like the fact that you feel like Sherlock Holmes...See my username?

Lord James does seem to have put his neck out a great deal and he's got a good background in fraud and finances.

I really think there will be more to this tale before next week is through.

-m0r

yes.. I missed that one by a mile.. *shakes head and laughs*

I felt his speech was nervous and desperate, like he was frustrated no one was listening to him, so out of frustration and desperation he took the first opportunity he could to leak what is happening..

Even laying himself and his career bare for all to see that he is being honest (the IRA remarks spring to mind)

Certainly a very strange turn of events, and I am sure you are right, we'll hear a lot more about this by the end of the week

If this Foundation X is truly as wealthy as claimed, then obviously they have been hoarding vast amounts of wealth for a long time, while people suffered and died in millions.Surely Foundation X is guilty of destabilising monetary systems the world over.

These people need to be named and brought to justice.They quite clearly have no regard for humanity.Something really stinks here.This sounds like a trick/hoax of Jeckyll Island proportions.Is this the next phase,almost 100 years on?

reply to post by thoughtsfull


And some of the people was laughing at him in the house of lords. what do they find so funny about it.

reply to post by infinite


Nice thought.

I thought the group with all this wealth might be moving to britain. and thats why they may want us to be better off economically.

All so I wonder if this false flag peopel are talking about for the 6th of november might have something to do with this.

Only time will tell I guess.

reply to post by ThePeopleParty


I do wonder about coincidences with the noises some are making about events that are meant to take place this month.. perhaps this group knows something and are moving their cash to an Island that deem is safe? not sure.. but I guess it is better than having money flying out of the country.

reply to post by ThePeopleParty


Well, this "group" is not going to move its base of operations to China.

I have a worth idea who the six are, just need to confirm it with a few sources I know. But, I believe, the deal has already been made.

Originally posted by andrewh7
So, you're left with two possibilities: 1. the anonymous benefactors are liars, OR 2. they have in their possession a large quantity of gold that was not mined on this planet.

And a third possibility, namely that more gold has been mined than has been declared. This would be in the interests of mining companies, because it keeps the price of gold high due to scarcity.

Originally posted by HelionPrime
There is however one case where interest would not be an issue on a loan & that is in the Islamic monetary system which absolutely prohibits financial transactions involving interest (usury).

Good thinking.

Originally posted by PriamsPride
It's too late to dig through this whole topic, but in case no one has mentioned it yet, the OITC sounds like a strong candidate for "Foundation X".

This has been denied by Lord James, yesterday.

you know...there are websites that try and sell canned unicorn meat. because it is in some blog does not make it true. need more proof with some type of gravitas.

Originally posted by infinite
reply to post by ThePeopleParty

 

Well, this "group" is not going to move its base of operations to China.

I have a worth idea who the six are, just need to confirm it with a few sources I know. But, I believe, the deal has already been made.

Hi Infinite, So what are your suspicions on this group and their reasons to inject cash into the UK and why do you feel that the deal (deals) have already been made?

Originally posted by jimmyx
you know...there are websites that try and sell canned unicorn meat. because it is in some blog does not make it true. need more proof with some type of gravitas.

you mean some people eat unicorn meat? how sad, i like unicorns

BTW the link a just below that says Hansard is a link the official transcription of the speech given by Lord Blackheath in the House of Lords. There is a recording of the televised version of the speech knocking around.. not sure if that is enough gravitas for you as I certainly want to know more about this shadow organisation.

Originally posted by thoughtsfull
BTW the link a just below that says Hansard is a link the official transcription of the speech given by Lord Blackheath in the House of Lords. There is a recording of the televised version of the speech knocking around.. not sure if that is enough gravitas for you

Not really, we have all sorts of idiots in the House of Lords, and it's all televised. At the end of the day, he hasn't presented a shred of evidence for this bizzare story, and lots of it doesn't add up.

Sounds like he's been hoaxed...that's why people were laughing.