It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Moyers was right about the JFK assassination that was a result of anything goes remember JFK threatened them before and he fired Dulless with the CIA's mindset back then it's not hard to imagine what they decided to do in order to "protect." the national interest.I think 9/11 was a result of both anything goes and anything coming home to haunt us.Yes,the CIA ISI Al-Qeda and Taliban are connected they have been connected since the 70's the question I have is how does ALQAP (Al-Queda in the Arabian Peninsula fits into this? I believe Anwar Alawaki is a lackey and the recent bombing scare was more of a pys op then an false flag.
Originally posted by RomanMaroni
reply to post by mike dangerously
First, I have to make a correction to my previous post. John O'Neill quit the FBI not the CIA. Apparently a mind to finger information transfer problem on my behalf . . I apologize.
Mike are you referring to the part where Moyers is talking about the CIA using the Mafia, and deciding assassinating foreign leaders was ok. He says questions about Kennedy still linger and most of "us" dismiss them, but you can't help but wonder after you realize the things the CIA had done and were planning to do. He says, "Once we decide anything goes, anything can come home to haunt us." I believe Moyers makes a true statement, and the US decided anything goes years before the Kennedy assassination.
We definitely decided anything goes in the Middle East at least as far back as August 19 1953 when our CIA led a coup detat overthrew democratically elected leader of Iran Mohammad Mosaddegh. We go to war with a military dictator in Saddam Hussein in Iraq to spread democracy, but we support and give aid to a military dictator to Musharaff in Pakistan.
We know the Mujahadeen was trained, funded and armed by the CIA. We know Al-Qaeda comes from the Mujahdeen. Therefore, Al-Qaeda was trained and armed by the CIA. The ISI is created with the CIA as its model and works closely with the CIA. We know some Al-Qaeda figures are also agents of the ISI. The ISI installs the Taliban in Afghanistan with full knowledge of the CIA (it wasn't secret). Congressman Jim McDermott says the US put the Taliban in and funded them. It seems to me the CIA, ISI, Al-Qaeda, and the Taliban are all intertwined.
So the CIA trained Al-Qaeda/ Saudi Citizen/ ISI agents, with the help of the Taliban, are responsible for 9/11. Is this part of us "deciding anything goes"? Or is this the resulting "anything can home to haunt us"?
Originally posted by roboe
"Never mentioned again", except when they were mentioned 5 months later
Originally posted by youngdrodeau
reply to post by RomanMaroni
No offense man,not trying to be nasty,but you're way off if you still beleive there were hijackers & that Osama & Al-Qaeda did this.There were no hijackers at all.Get that out of your mind.The planes in NY were remote controlled,a plane flew OVER the Pentagon & kept goin as a missile or bomb went off & someone just dug a plane-shaped hole in Shanskville.I don't what the story is with these supposed hijackers,but they didn't do 9/11.My best bet is that these guys were ordinary people.Some were probably just regular passengers on the planes that hit the towers or WTC employees.Some probably just got on planes back to the Middle East and the govt just showed us footage of them at the airport (Remember,Arab people fly all over everyday.Footage of alot of Arab guys at an airport terminal on 9/11 proves nothing.).This might explain why when some of the hijackers were reported alive by the BBC,the govt said "Could be.We're not really sure of their identities".And a few,like Mohommad Atta,were probably put on payroll to go take flight lessons so the story would look more beleivable.They were probably shipped out of country on that controversial flight that the bin Laden's were on.
The facts are that planes don't vaporize in a crash
& that buildings don't symmetrically collapse at free fall speed due to fire and/or plane crashes.
That is key.
That is what I base my view of 9/11 being an inside job on & is in fact the only reason to suspect that it was an inside job.If the towers had not collapsed the way they did & Flights 77 & 93 had left any irrefutable evidence of having crashed,I would not question the OV.But that's not the case.
Originally posted by youngdrodeau
reply to post by RomanMaroni
BOTTOM LINE.THE END.