It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SphinxMontreal
"and your explanation also call for this 'magical' jet fuel to, not just cause explosions on 'Que' of the buildings' collapse, but also somehow dribble down and cause explosions in the basement of the building...."
Aaahhh yes...that magical jet fuel. When it wasn't exploding on impact, it was shooting down the elevator shafts, blowing out the lobby and causing explosions in the basement level. And when it wasn't doing that, it settled on the floor of impact and caused all these random flammable objects to go BOOM!
"just a hint dave...using a condescending tone is not a substitute for 'factual' evidence..."
When one cannot use intellect to gain authority and respect, they usually resort to condescending tactics to reinvent themselves as a phony authority figure. This tactic is used to intimidate others from debating the issues, since the person utilizing it usually has no skills in recognizing these issues, let alone debating them.
In short, when you don't know what the hell you are talking about, just pound your chest a few times, repeat the same moronic catch phrases like a broken record and hope nobody catches on and calls you on it.
Originally posted by dereks
Originally posted by hdutton
Actually the designers DID state that they should survive an impact from a Boeing 747; the largest plane likely to strick them at the time of their construction.
Oh dear, yet another lie from a damn fool conspiracy site - the WTC buildings were unveiled to the public on January 18, 1964, The Boeing 747 was not even started to be designed until 1965... and did not fly until 1969
You really should not believe anything one of those damn fool conspiracy sites states without checking!
Originally posted by jambatrumpet
You once again present highly unlikely scenarios as the 'norm'....and somehow these 'flammable materials' just 'happened' to explode at the same time of the buildings collapse (as that is the point at which witness' heard the explosions)...
And this is all assuming that the jet fuel didn't burn up in the original explosion upon impact, and somehow 'simmered' for hours...
and your explanation also call for this 'magical' jet fuel to, not just cause explosions on 'Que' of the buildings' collapse, but also somehow dribble down and cause explosions in the basement of the building....
just a hint dave...using a condescending tone is not a substitute for 'factual' evidence...
Originally posted by RomanMaroni
Well Kiwi I believe you have made a case that can't be denied or disputed. No one could respond to anything you posted in this "Part 1; The Build up to September 11th 2001." Anything posted in this thread that dealt with any topics occurring on 9/11 or after was off topic and imo should be deleted. So a "debunker" who has read this thread can never use "all the questions have been answered" as a response without knowing he or she is lying. I keep checking on this thread to try to provide some info as possible rebuttals if need be, but no one has addressed anything. The only attempt I saw was a weak one that said this is from loose change or something. Good post there.
This thread just briefly goes over some oddities involving the hijackers themselves. If anyone cares to look closer at theses "culprits", here's is a link: www.historycommons.org.../11_hijackersedit on 4-11-2010 by RomanMaroni because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by jambatrumpet
reply to post by GoodOlDave
Dave, dave, dave...
First of all, you completely ignored the question of:
"what is the explanation for these 'myriad of electrical transformers' laying dormant and suddenly exploding within seconds of the collapse of the buildings?"
Secondly,
Your claim of William Rodriguez' testimony proving that fireballs from the jet engine fuel traveled down the elevator shafts is fiction as well....
All of the passenger elevators in both world trade center buildings are 'jogged' between sections. A fire ball could have only traveled to next lower 'skylobby'. There is not ONE passenger elevator shaft that leads from impact floor to ground level. See diagram here:
To your point of me ignoring eyewitness testimony? Also fiction..I believe all of the eyewitness'..including the cab driver @ the pentagon (yes, I believe a plane hit the pentagon)..
You are the one who claims the dozens of firefighters who witnessed explosions are somehow mistaken...
No I didn't. It's just that explosions were being heard all that morning so the fact that the explosions would continue to be heard up until the moment of actual collapse isn't something I thought would be up for debate. The fires causing the flammable objects to go BOOM would continue to be doing this as long as there were fires and flammable items to go BOOM.
Originally posted by jambatrumpet
All of the passenger elevators in both world trade center buildings are 'jogged' between sections. A fire ball could have only traveled to next lower 'skylobby'. There is not ONE passenger elevator shaft that leads from impact floor to ground level. See diagram here: www.abovetopsecret.com...