It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by EarthOccupant
@MSFitte
That what i meant in my above post as well.
Calling people crazy is the most simple thing to do, or the last resort.
I don’t know about Hollywood Star Whackers, but I do believe that Mr. Quaid is in fear for his life, and he could well be in some kind of danger. He says he has been harassed for at least the last 20 years. This is what I think is going on.
I think Randy and wife Evi at some point in their past likely landed on a list. Eg. Under occupational health and safety laws, you can be placed on a monitoring list via what’s called a Threat Assessment Team.
The team will contact those around you and explain why you have been flagged. Unfortunately this type of monitoring can also systemically destroy your life. This is the part that leaves many claiming conspiracy.
A lot of people are on these lists, some who should be there, many others who should not. I think what the Quaids should do is hire a lawyer, one who is familiar with privy laws, occupational health and safety laws, and mental health laws.
From what I have read the downward spiral really started after 26 of his co-workers complained of verbal and physical harassment. Claims such as this in today’s society get reported, and this can get you placed on one of these lists by the threat assessment teams, and it can also serve to blacklist your life. The other sad reality is that people on these lists die, because the monitoring often crosses the line to targeting, and a conspiracy of sorts.
Originally posted by Harassment101
ATS use to be a really good place for critical thinking, now it's the place to come to have conspiracy dispelled, sorry but it's true.
Originally posted by wcitizen
reply to post by Aeons
You seem to believe everything you read about these things in the MSM. So your logic seems to be
a. That because it's in the MSM it is true.
b. Does the MSM tell the unbiased, accurate truth?
c. Yes, because it says it does.
But we're talking about Randy Friggin' Quaid, an actor who's had, for the most part, bit parts in B movies. I mean, credits like Caddyshack II, Major League II, Vegas Vacation, and The Adventures of Pluto Nash. What power or importance could he possibly hold in Hollywood that would make him an attractive target?
Originally posted by Korg Trinity
My point above btw was that it's easy to pain someone in a negative light in the media, especially if you are the MOB in Hollywood
And would be the logical thing to do if you were going to kill a high profile person... discredit them... let people such as you say it couldn't be murder cause they were crazy anyway... Then Whack Em...
Originally posted by JoshNorton
But we're talking about Randy Friggin' Quaid, an actor who's had, for the most part, bit parts in B movies. I mean, credits like Caddyshack II, Major League II, Vegas Vacation, and The Adventures of Pluto Nash. What power or importance could he possibly hold in Hollywood that would make him an attractive target?
Originally posted by Korg Trinity
My point above btw was that it's easy to pain someone in a negative light in the media, especially if you are the MOB in Hollywood
And would be the logical thing to do if you were going to kill a high profile person... discredit them... let people such as you say it couldn't be murder cause they were crazy anyway... Then Whack Em...
Targets are narcissistic to believe that groups would track them.
3. But seriously…who are these stalkers? How are there large, organized, groups of people that set out to just go after YOU. Do you think you are so important that a whole squad of people spend their waking hours (getting paid, I assume) to stalk and harass you? It’s a very narcissistic attitude. How could anyone even justify the expense of maintaining such surveillance?
A: Targets are often accused of being crazy, narcissistic, or wanting to be the center of attention to believe that groups of strangers would spend 24/7 tracking them. The citizen informants are just average community members in some cases, while others might be paid informants with very specific agendas.
Targets are not narssaistic. Most targets do not believe they are that important that groups of people would follow them around, that is why it often takes years for the target to clue in and believe that this is happening to them.
Again there is no expense when you have a network already set up to monitor individuals in a community. It simply becomes a matter of shifting resources. Monitoring an additional person is no more difficult than setting a place at the table for one more, when you have everything already in place.