OMG! HUGE Cache of New 911 footage released !!!

Originally posted by FoosM

Originally posted by Grifter.be
reply to post by FoosM

 

Dude, there is a big difference in something what we all saw on screen and a few thousand others in real life, and in something we only can see trough a screen and NOT IN REAL LIFE...

I think that was my whole point.
There is a big difference in what we all see on screen vs a few others see in real life.

Where is the line between tv fiction and tv fact?
gmHcbRvHNxw

At any rate, where do you get this few thousand figure if it relates to 911?
A few thousand people saw a plane hit the second tower? Where do you get those stats?
Cause frankly, I question the possibility, for several reasons:
The amount of smoke blocking the view of the approach.
People's attention on the other tower.
The fact that other tall buildings reduce visibility.
The fact that the "plane" approached from a body of water and travelled an incredible speed.
And we know seem to have another plane in the air.

This is not about the towers, but an analysis on Pentagon attack witnesses.
But the same reasoning can be used.

Hey, i talked about the towers, not the pentagon. Pentagon could be a missile, no doubt about that... But i am sure two planes hit the WTC.

Originally posted by ruidude
reply to post by Kemal

 

I don't know if it's been mentioned before, or if anyone noticed, but in this same video, if you follow the supposed trajectory of that object (seems like an helictopter that disappears into the clouds), at about 36 seconds you can see what seems like bursts of fire from within the clouds of smoke, just a few centimetres to the right of the tower, and then the same burst of fire in the tower itself. Exactly 10 seconds after, the plane appears on screen and crashes the tower!

You Really have to see this in Fullscreen otherwise you won't notice this bursts of fire (that's what it seems to me...)

Here is the link again

www.youtube.com...

Yes, i could see it. Its like light flashes, two of them and a few secs later the same flashes at the tower. It could be reflection from the sun on the helicopter?

notice the pulsating glow under the plane as the PLANE COMES INTO FAME

the object pulsates when exiting the towers/ look close, bring it up to its largest size and keep pausing it when the "plane" comes into view, it just appears out of no where, notice there is no tail?.. FAKE PLANES using HOLOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY. they are orbs/ufos

www.youtube.com...

reply to post by larry619


You have to be kidding me? The video quality is very poor, but you can still tell that it is an airplane. There are other videos of the plane from the same side and from about that far away if not further. There is no "orb" or anything similar. I know the engine was ejected from the other side of the building..

lets see frame by frame how the plane enters the towers...what does it say to people
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/78e36bcf21c1.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/b67cbe3159f4.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/672a04e98842.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/245c8372ac24.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/52f2b290b5fe.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/49e551140679.jpg[/atsimg]

whats the opinions on it....



does anything make complete sense.

Also want to see the steel standing after a truck bomb explodes three floors down in 1993 in the same buildings...notice how the steel is basically untouched........steel just does not succumb to the force...let alone from the force of an aluminium plane striking

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/d9f5a5bedf5a.jpg[/atsimg]

May we also look at the construction of the building.

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/1768708e4438.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/432f17b2311f.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/fa3d9b6358f5.jpg[/atsimg]

now let look at the only real thing standing after hiroshima....this is before the real use of steel in building construction...in it's infancy.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/938e227f5740.jpg[/atsimg]

strange how the steel is twisted and bent but is still bolted and attached at the flanges.

So i leave it upto others to think about these things now....the buildings collapse makes no sense to me...how about you?

Nice work dude!!

a movie i made, no conspiracy's in it!:

Just to let you know there are more vids being put up in the last hour to 3 hours ....

911 crasting on youtube

Originally posted by plube
lets see frame by frame how the plane enters the towers...what does it say to people

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/b67cbe3159f4.jpg[/atsimg]

what do these say to people...

hmmm, lets see what the visual evidence shows which compression issues etc have no bearing on revealing:
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/33853cb062ff.png[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/9d4a7d8aba60.png[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/e67bf0f58526.png[/atsimg]

the plane is INSIDE the tower with no explosion or crash physics present.

anyone that believes these images are REAL, is either in denial without any common visual sense, needs to see an eye doctor, or a shill.

and see the little white spot in the upper right corner??? can you guess what that IS, and what that MEANS?
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/390628fb6e4d.png[/atsimg]
yes folks, its the TIP of the WING STILL VISIBLE and INSIDE THE TOWER slicing through STEEL without any damage or crash physics occurring including NO HOLE that the wings and engines alone would have and should have CARVED/created. In fact, the area/columns between the right wing TIP and engines have miraculously HEALED themselves.

so how do skeptics and duhbunkers explain that "anomaly"? Its physically impossible for the TIP of a real boeing 767-200 wing to still be VISIBLE after the rest of the wing has disappeared into the tower.

the laws that govern our universe says Its a physical impossibility and the visual evidence supports NRPT and proves beyond a doubt, the plane is CGI and this video contains fakery.

reply to post by Grifter.be

The effects of frame rate, and resolution are what you are witnessing. Not a fake plane. Too many eyewitness'.

OMG, and yet more proof the US govt, didn't do said acts of terror!

Do you people honestly reside on planet Earth?...................

No one, I repeat this again for you tools, NO ONE, no matter the support you rally behind you, will believe in such non sense.


NICE TRY!!!!


I'm sure you'll convince the masses one day of neglecting their duties to best suit your own ideals.


People who bring up the govt being behind 9/11 are usually those within the age group of "16-24"

I'm going to start taking my real world advice from those who've never had it?

RIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGHT, makes perfect sense(in the world of the insane) zzz,

Originally posted by jambatrumpet
reply to post by Grifter.be

 

The effects of frame rate, and resolution are what you are witnessing. Not a fake plane.

there's enough resolution for one to observe and distinguish an intact wing tip after allegedly the rest of the wing slicing through steel, intact columns in the area pointed out, a plane inside the tower without any crash physics, and the absence of any explosion such an impact would generate and be expect upon impact. In fact, no explosion whatsoever occurs until the plane has completely disappeared inside the tower.

the hez video is fake (let alone the luc corsh vid)...and the red line further illustrates why:

Originally posted by jambatrumpet
Too many eyewitness'.

...who have all been contradicted by just as many if not more that saw no plane or a missle.

but since you clearly lack any real understanding of NRPT and parrot the same old debunked arguments, its no surprise you're another casualty of the psyop hoax.

Originally posted by Gakus
OMG, and yet more proof the US govt, didn't do said acts of terror!
Do you people honestly reside on planet Earth?...................
No one, I repeat this again for you tools, NO ONE, no matter the support you rally behind you, will believe in such non sense.
NICE TRY!!!!
I'm sure you'll convince the masses one day of neglecting their duties to best suit your own ideals.
People who bring up the govt being behind 9/11 are usually those within the age group of "16-24"
I'm going to start taking my real world advice from those who've never had it?
RIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGHT, makes perfect sense(in the world of the insane) zzz,

10 lines of nothing but rhetorical irrelevant babble and ZERO evidence refuting or even addressing what you claim is nonsense.

why?

because the evidence is credible and supports a theory you obviously know nothing about.

thanks for proving once again why NRPT has never been disproven and continues to grow.

reply to post by Orion7911

I do have to admit it is pretty unbelievable how that plane slices through steel with no resistance, or loss of momentum...

reply to post by Orion7911


The plane DID hit the building and that video IS real. The quality of the video is too horrible to say anything that you've said.

reply to post by Orion7911


thanks for adding to the frame by frmae oriion...and very well presented..a..and that is exactly what i was seeing in that video...and also that is not the only video that shows that same effect occuring and also not from only that angle....it all stinks to me ,,,,and the more we show people the better they will come to understand...and the latest addition of all the videos are showing more and more evidence of anomallys....so either all the videos have been faked or there were a whole lot of crap cameras just over 9yrs ago....or the cameras are reight and are filming exactly what they were seeing.
I think i will just take some random vids and do the same and see if from this random selection anomalies shows.

reply to post by Orion7911


Are you referring to the fact that the tail wing suddenly increases speed?
If zo... That is strange indeed...
But maybe its due to the fact that the rif section gets smaller and therefore has lesser resistance of the steel frame of the building and therefore starts to accelerate... Dunno, just a thought...

As for all the others who claim its not possible that the plane cut the buildings steels frame, i don't think it did...
But the speed of the plane is so fast that it pushes itself inside... , like the way a snowball would into a grid of steel or an egg trowed at a grid. And the speed was probably faster than the air could give oxygen to the fuel to ignite! So it was on fire, but only gave an explosion after a big suck of air! And for the disappearing plane, i have seen movies before of tests of planes flying into concrete! and the disappear too!

reply to post by plube


I would love to see you take all of the videos (raw sources) that show the impact and point out anomalies in each one. That goes for any of you doubting the videos. Please do show us. A plane did hit both towers, just admit it.

Originally posted by Grifter.be
reply to post by Orion7911

 

Are you referring to the fact that the tail wing suddenly increases speed?
If zo... That is strange indeed...
But maybe its due to the fact that the rif section gets smaller and therefore has lesser resistance of the steel frame of the building and therefore starts to accelerate... Dunno, just a thought...

As for all the others who claim its not possible that the plane cut the buildings steels frame, i don't think it did...
But the speed of the plane is so fast that it pushes itself inside... , like the way a snowball would into a grid of steel or an egg trowed at a grid. And the speed was probably faster than the air could give oxygen to the fuel to ignite! So it was on fire, but only gave an explosion after a big suck of air! And for the disappearing plane, i have seen movies before of tests of planes flying into concrete! and the disappear too!

if the "plane" didn't CUT through the steel frame, please explain what happened.

speed doesn't negate and dismiss whats not present; crash physics

and how can you compare what would happen to SNOWBALL hitting a STEEL STRUCTURE of the wtc?

upon impact of the wings on a steel structure, the fuel tanks would have ignited almost immediately... thats not what happened.

please show a comparable example of a plane flying into a STEEL STRUCTURE, NOT CONCRETE, where the plane disappeared in any way like we see in the footage above.