OMG! HUGE Cache of New 911 footage released !!!

Great find C,

I'm always interested in new 911 footage. I will be interested to read through the discussion of the plane/object that flies right to left that you pointed out in the 1st video. I couldn't even see it the 1st time I watched it

Thanks,
Ot

reply to post by ethancoop



Really? and going by your logic, (and I see right through what you're trying to do here) what exactly is it that I've said that is so hard to believe Ethan?

reply to post by Overtime


Thanks OT,

I would like to know that as well, unfortunately as you can tell, this subject is still quite the emotional one, so many things need to be cleared up before getting to the other anomalies. I still don't understand what I'm seeing in regards to that clip. I see the supposed plane hit the tower, but right behind it, I also see something that is flying on the same path right above the smoke trail. I really don't have a clue mate.

I am pretty open minded to some crazy theories and ideas, but I can't understand why the govt would go to all the trouble to fake hologram planes/drones while spiriting away two planes full of passengers, only to kill them off. Seems like the inside job would be easier just using the real planes full of hostages. I don't know. I do know that the more I look at these videos the more depressed I become and I start thinking about all of the people who had to watch this happen with their own eyes, in real time with real sounds of screaming or crashing. I cannot even begin to imagine what the people in there went through.

And while we are being kept busy watching and analyzing these videos, it makes me wonder what's going on out there tonight. I don't believe in coincidences too often.

Hello ATS, First time post here, and ive been browsing this site pretty heavily the past few weeks since i came across it...

This thread is CRAZY!! so much info to think about and process... that last video on page 17 is just nuts, especially the part near the end with that lady going on record she wasnt gonna commit suicide on a radio show, then she dies and its supposed suicide... just crazyness

I definantly believe 9/11 had some type of govt involvement. Im surprised with all these 100+ videos released, there are still none on the Pentacon, er Pentagon i mean. Thank you to everyone who has given input on this topic, and especially the people who can explain stuff, and break down the frames in these videos!

www.wanttoknow.nl...

This video was posted earlier and a man with lots of experience did a very thorough analysis of something really strange. Its worth the watch dont know how it got over-looked.

"http://blip.tv/play/AYHy7kIC" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="390" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true">

Originally posted by Rahjian
Are you seriously that delusional that you don't think that was a PLANE?! You are &%$#@&! stupid if you don't. A friend of my family was ON THE SECOND PLANE. I also have an uncle who was working in one of the buildings in the WTC area who personally eye witnessed planes smashing into the towers.

Don't get me wrong, I believe 100% 9/11 was a sham. Bush knocked down the towers no doubt. But as to them not being planes? Come on get a grip.

Dude. What? If you think that the government actually had a hand in killing 2,000 people what would stop them from taking the people off the plane and killing them then sending a fake plane in it's place? Nothing. I'm not saying thats what happened, but you're the one thats delusional, too emotionally attached to be a objective observer

Thanks OP, especially for that first video, I was checking in to see if the aircraft has been identified that is 3 seconds or so behind f175, and appears to be tailing it.

One thing I wanted to mention though, was I remember in one video of the impact of f175(from the front, or opposite view of the OP's first video) and moments after the impact you can see a large white(commercial aircraft) in the background. (I'll look for the video) Anyways, I wonder if the aircraft in question is that white passenger jet?

Although I must say, the aircraft in question appears to be higher than that white passenger jet, and also, when comparing the size of f175 to the aircraft in question, the latter appears much smaller. It also appears to be moving very fast, it was only seconds behind f175, appearing to be flying above it at almost the same speed. Strangely though, if you watch other videos, of close up views of the impact of f175, and even some that are slightly longer shots 1. You don't ever see this aircraft in question in any of them(that is unless it does turn out to be the white passenger jet) and 2. Strangely, you don't hear this aircraft on any of the videos of the impact with audio included.

I don't know, didn't have much time to look in to it last night when I saw the thread, but I hope others may try to seriously pinpoint what kind of aircraft it was and who it belonged to. If it's just commercial traffic or not.

Originally posted by tsurfer2000h
reply to post by MrWendal

 

How does heat explode? Seriously you are kidding right? Here is a few vids that can answer your question.

That is how heat causes explosions. You also need to remember that passenger planes do have oxygen one way or another and oxygen is highly flammable and it doesn't take a super amount of heat to ignite.Especially if it compressed.

What you show in your video does not answer my question. Not even close. Your attempting to compare apples and lawn mowers. The context of my question was in reference to the reporter asking "What about the 2nd explosion?". This is after the plane made impact with the towers. Your video shows fully intact trucks. I hate to point out the obvious, but once those planes hit the towers, they were no longer intact. So what exactly was the heat causing to explode 60+ floors up? Did the heat cause the plane to blow up twice? I am fully aware that passenger planes have oxygen, so maybe you can explain how that oxygen did not explode when the plane impacted the tower and turned into a great big fireball? Was this magic oxygen?

Originally posted by blah yada

Originally posted by kadara_dk
i have taken ,blah yada´s word about something in the sky in this 9/11video.: www.youtube.com...


and here is 5 pic of the mysticobject : UFO









i am dunno about what it is, but it is fast ;

That wasn't the object i was referring to.If you look in pic 3 it's towards the top right of pic between the lamp and the fence
It's in a couple of the other pics too.It emerges top right by the lamp and shoots down 45 deg to the brick wall between the railings.

Tell me if you can see it.

I hear you blah yada, but apart from kadara I don't think anyone else has...

What you point out is the most mysterious of all the 9/11 phenomena.

I've heard them called 'super-sonic seagulls' but what they actually are remains a mystery.

In any vids other than the 9/11 vids they would be thought of as ET UFO's, but they are so closely associated with an obviously human operation, that you are left with WTF?

They can be seen in multiple videos at the time of the plane impacts of both towers, but I have never heard or read of a reasonable explanation for them.

The common explanation is they are birds, but if so wouldn't there be thousands of SSS's in the background of the thousands of cinema movies made in the last century?

They are very strange, and well spotted to pick them in that clip

reply to post by LightWonder


Holy crap. Is there any validity to the 'live' footage analyzed here? 'The Ball'? Can anyone confirm/deny?

edit; from the 5:00-6:15 mark is where they show it

Hi, this is my first post here at ATS, been here reading for quite a while.
I am a graphic designer and i edited some 911 footage to show you
how "easy" this stuff can be edited...



Let me make this clear:

In my opinion, there is no doubt that 911 was an inside job. But i think it is
important for the whole "truther scene" to stay united and dont have a "war"
about if planes, rockets or whatever have hit the WTC in the end...
The Towers have fallen on purpose, thats for sure.

I think the Planes was remote controlled, but that is just my personal opinion.

It took me less than 15 minutes to edit this footage...and why am i doing this?

Well, you can´t believe any video until you have saw the original raw-footage...
CGI and all that stuff, you all know that b*ll#....
Some videos are just strange...keep in mind, some people could have an
agenda in releasing edited footage!

Please forgive my English.

Spread Love,
Hagbart2Celine3

It would appear that contained in the release of all this information from NIST, by order, are segments which prove that they engaged in scientific fraud, and therefore cover-up in conspiracy to committ mass murder. There was plenty of evidence for the use of explosives in the destruction of the twin towers and building 7.

reply to post by guavas


I totally agree with you. It just seems to me that everyone is making more out of this than there needs to be. We all, well most of, saw with our own eyes on that day the second plane hitting that building the feed I was watching on tv was live. I saw it with my own eyes. I say for sure these videos could have been tampered with. Although I do believe that there is a lot about this whole incident that still has to be explained. Very interesting read indeed.

reply to post by HYADEAN2025


Mate that video is very very interesting too many coincedenses for my likeing thats for sure but I'm sure there will be heaps of people that will be like na it's all wrong well I think they all are. I wonder if Wiki's insurance file if ( 9/11 related ) I sure hope so.

Those claiming the 9/11 footage has been tampered always refer to this:
www.disclose.tv...

I want someone to source a clip of the media using the tampered footage this gentleman is comparing in his analysis. The one supposedly used by NBC evening news.

So far I've looked and I've only found them using the one that hasn't been tampered with.

I'm not buying that 9/11 footage has been tampered with, other than that particular piece....

The video analysis, however, is still a good 3d presentation of the path of the 2nd impact.

911? Everything can be debated, about who was responsible and how it was done. But in my opinion Building 7 is the smoking gun that proves this attack was planned far ahead and points to an inside job of varying degrees, or major proportions... And like Raum Emanuel said, never let a good tragedy go to waste. Our government seized 911 like a hungry dog pouncing on a steak, as an opportunity to tighten the shackles on all of us common peasants. That, is an undebatable fact.

reply to post by LightWonder


Wow..great video analysis.

I find it interesting too that toward the end of the video Andrew Johnson is interviewed. For those who know, he is quite prominent on www.drjudywood.com... who herself questions what we saw on 9/11 and who offers an interesting explanation for the disintegration of the WTC's into dust. Hi-tech weaponry and quite possibly holograms were used on 9/11, which is why 10 years later we are still scratching our heads and trying to figure out what happened...and TPTB knew we wouldnt see through the lie at the time because the technology was beyond our comprehension. It appears with time however we are beginning to see more and more through the haze and the truth is coming out..

For me, this video has brought me full circle, re-introducing the possible explanation for what we saw on TV with regard to the use of holograms and TV fakery.

As the saying goes - 'Truth can be stranger than fiction'.

that 'ball' looks to me like a plane in really low resolution..i also doubt that nobody would have seen such a thing hit the second tower...all of new york were watching when the second plane hit..im sure some would have mentioned seeing a ball..

i dont believe the official story..but this ball thing is nonsense to me..

also..couldnt that 'pod' be the shadow being cast by the engine?...