It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by tristar
After your last escapade with the McDonald files you did cause sweat to break out,
Originally posted by Aeons
reply to post by Shadowed
Oh, I'm an "Elite" then. AWESOME. I feel a Mr.Burns like finger drumming coming my way.
None of your morals are promoted by staying on Earth alone. None of your wants are achieved by stopping progress.
Your goals of more moral and better people isn't achieved with your rabid insistence about staying on Earth until everyone fits your does as you have told them too.
So, I guess I "diminish" and you link completely unrelated ideas to goals you have no interest in.
I believe that you're arguments fit the definition of Pious Fraud.
Though I'd also suggest Confusing Correlation with Causation, and Appeal to Widespread Belief, and Two Wrongs Make a Right.
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by Shadowed
So when you say "Not occupied." I guess you mean Mars or similar planet.
Throughout the history of our planet, nature has wiped out species and brought new ones.. long before man came a long. I see many people talking about species that are becoming extinct, but those same people forget to tell us how many new species we have discovered in the past year.
People forget that evolution and creation of new species is on going. Man is currently one at the top of the food chain and certainly abuse of any environment is a really bad idea... but in the end, when Nature tosses the next ice age at us in a few decades, we may not do so well
Mars not occupied? errrr well if you say so
Originally posted by Aeons
reply to post by Shadowed
Fallacy of False Alternatives, Ignoring of the Disproof, Fast Talking.
But while your debate includes all those and the fallacies I listed before, the argument itself is the
Argument Demanding Impossible Perfection. You aren't even hiding it behind the normal gibberish. You are actually doing it outright.edit on 2010/10/23 by Aeons because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by CHRLZ
Mmmm. Yes. Quite.
Well, you'll be pleased to know you (and a number of others on this thread) have earned your place on Ark B of the fleet! Congratulations. Ark B will be sent out first, followed a short time later by the rest of us...
..
Originally posted by jephers0n
Originally posted by CHRLZ
Mmmm. Yes. Quite.
Well, you'll be pleased to know you (and a number of others on this thread) have earned your place on Ark B of the fleet! Congratulations. Ark B will be sent out first, followed a short time later by the rest of us...
..
Does the crew of this 'Ark B' also include all the hairdressers, telephone repairmen, television repairmen, lawyers, and politicians, by chance?
I do believe a certain Mr. Arthur Dent would be quite displeased to hear of the launching of this ship... But that's my own humble opinion.
When a place gets crowded enough to require ID’s, social collapse is not far away. It is time to go elsewhere. The best thing about space travel is that it made it possible to go elsewhere.
The second best thing about space travel is that the distances involved make war very difficult, usually impractical, and almost always unnecessary. This is probably a loss for most people, since war is our races most popular diversion, one which gives purpose and color to dull and stupid lives. But it is a great boon to the intelligent man who fights only when he must--never for sport.
There are hidden contradictions within the minds of people who “love nature” while deploring the “artificialities” with which “Man has spoiled ‘Nature.” The obvious contradiction lies in their choice of words, which imply that Man and his artifacts are not part of “Nature”--but beavers and their damns are. But the contradictions go deeper than this prima-facie absurdity. In declaring his love for a beaver damn (erected by beavers for beaver’s purposes) and his hatred for dams erected by men (for the purpose of men) the “Naturist” reveals his hatred for his own race--i.e., his own self-hatred. In the case of “Naturists” such self—hatred is understandable; they are such a sorry lot. But hatred is too strong an emotion to feel toward them; pity and contempt are the most they rate. As for me, willy-nilly I am a man, not a beaver, and H. Sapiens is the only race I have or can have. Fortunately for me, I like being part of a race made up of men and women-- it strikes me as a fine arrangement and perfectly “natural.” Believe it or not, there were “Naturists” who opposed the first flight to old Earth’s Moon as being “unnatural” and a “despoiling of nature.”
Originally posted by CHRLZ
Yes. Telephone sanitizers, actually... I'm glad someone got the HGTTG refernce..
Still, getting there would Still, getting there would require an advanced propulsion system that could get off the ground with minimal fuel and land safely.
Originally posted by Mr Mask
Originally posted by pinealexplorer
oh my god!! I will never live on this lush blue planet ever again..... holy $#@! Haaaaaaaalp!!! get me offffff thisssss!!!! get me offff this!!!!!
Captain Spartan, we have yet another crew member flipping out...should we have him report to the termination center on Dock-1B or should I just put this one down myself, sir?
He's freaking out the other passengers.