It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by carlitomoore
Here's what McDonald's own website says you'll find in their buns:
Enriched flour (bleached wheat flour, malted barley flour, niacin, reduced iron, thiamin mononitrate, riboflavin, folic acid, enzymes), water, high fructose corn syrup, sugar, yeast, soybean oil and/or partially hydrogenated soybean oil, contains 2% or less of the following: salt, calcium sulfate, calcium carbonate, wheat gluten, ammonium sulfate, ammonium chloride, dough conditioners (sodium stearoyl lactylate, datem,ascorbic acid, azodicarbonamide, mono- and diglycerides, ethoxylated monoglycerides, monocalcium phosphate, enzymes, guar gum, calcium peroxide, soy flour), calcium propionate and sodium propionate (preservatives), soy lecithin.
Originally posted by sabrinaleena
reply to post by FraternitasSaturni
This got me thinking about my stepdaughter. She was vegan for a long time. While she was pregnant she went from that to vegetarianism. I have never in my life seen a person gain so much weight from a veg diet than her while she was pregnant. 80 pounds. And she didn't start off her pregnancy overweight. She was slender. But... she didn't walk or exercise. I would try and encourage her to get up and walk with me but she would refuse every time. Now, her weight is back to normal but she learned a lesson. She eats a more balanced, omnivorous diet with meat added in within reason.
Reason seems to be the key word lacking from most American diets. Exercise would be the other.
Originally posted by Tifozi
reply to post by cushycrux
In case you don't know, your "enlightened" habits of vegetarian are causing damage to many, many forests, especially in Brazil.
With the rise of the FASHION of "healthy" food, countries like Brazil are actually destroying massive forest areas so they can plant alternative food resources, resources like the ones used by vegetarians. Soya is a very good example, since they found out, that the Amazon soil is perfect for cultivating soybeans.
So that you can keep your butt healthy, massive forests are being put down so they can profit from a stupid fashion that is becoming a vegetarian in modern society.
How is that different from killing animals for food? I don't get it.
I think that when people become vegetarians and "vegans", they must have the pre-requisite of having their heads up their butts.
In tracking food animal production from the feed through to the dinner table, the inefficiencies of meat, milk and egg production range from a 4:1 energy input to protein output ratio up to 54:1.[3] The result is that producing animal-based food is typically much less efficient than the harvesting of grains, vegetables, legumes, seeds and fruits for direct human consumption
The data we had indicated that a beef animal consumed 100 kg of hay and 4 kg of grain per 1 kg of beef produced. Using the basic rule that it takes about 1,000 liters of water to produce 1 kg of hay and grain, thus about 100,000 liters were required to produce the 1 kg of beef.
Source: en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by Tifozi
reply to post by cushycrux
So you're saying that is right to put down massive areas of the Amazon forest, the "Lungs of Earth", just because it's efficient?
Okay, you just proved my point.
Originally posted by Snarf
reply to post by DevolutionEvolvd
thank God there is at least one other intelligent human being in this thread.
Corporate bashing by jealous liberals.