It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by kid_cudi
Originally posted by Unity_99
reply to post by Phage
There are many doctorates out there who disagree, scientists who don't agree with this. And that should be warning enough for citizens to demand all the secrecy end in this world and disclosre it all, for something rotten is afoot and we're going to end it. Acutally, that directing lying made whole the house fall down. So automatically, based on professional scientific demonstrations, research and voices, I'm not convinced. The onus isn't on the public to trust murderers, and they haven't convinced me they're whole platform isn't one big lie to hide what the science according to Tesla himself and other experts does.
I just made links, in bold I emphased what needed saying.
I would reword what you just said because I couldnt understand the wording of your last post. It actually did not make sense at all and in fact I dont think anyone could understand what you just said. Im sorry if I sound rude Im not trying to be I just couldnt read what you said.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Gilbo303
No.
What are you talking about? Do you think I wrote that gibberish?
Originally posted by Gilbo303
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Gilbo303
No.
What are you talking about? Do you think I wrote that gibberish?
Sorry dude, I did not mean that in a nasty way! I read your posts often, but you lost me there!
'Acutally, that directing lying made whole the house fall down. So automatically, based on professional scientific demonstrations, research and voices, I'm not convinced.'
How do you mean? (I have definately have had a long day, so forgive me if I'm being a little slow here!)
Originally posted by thoughtform
reply to post by kid_cudi
yes, like I said, he has made some technical contributions, but it is dazzling you with fluff.
Much of what he was talking about does not apply to scalar technology.
He has made clear he doesn't agree with it, but many other capable people do.
If you reread the other thread he started on, it's not the technical discussion originally, that is the issue (although we don't seem to agree on that either, but we can talk about it.), it's the constant belittling and discrediting of others (not me), and condescending attitude...
Maybe I am just being more sensitive to it, I went back and looked at the threads, and felt the same way after.
I will try some introspection, maybe I am out of line.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Gilbo303
I didn't write that.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by Gilbo303
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Gilbo303
I didn't write that.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Phage...I have just committed EPIC failure!
My sincere apologies...
*saunters off to the corner of the room to put the dunce cap on my head*
Originally posted by thoughtform
Because of the nature of our understanding of EM theory, in terms of quantum and dimensional aspects, are still being ironed out, it opens the door for a 'valid' and 'reasonable' speculative discussion.
Your delivery, and seemingly general attitude, that you have singular knowledge of the concepts and that every one working in the field who doesn't share your understanding is a fraud and nuts, is off putting.
I tried, on every post, to overlook when you make offhanded remarks, but you keep doing it.
This is a speculative conspiracy forum, on top of the fact the whole EM field theory is fuzzy, especially in terms of leading edge undisclosed technologies. There are _no_ absolutes, and your position is based on absolutes.
Originally posted by thoughtform
reply to post by kid_cudi
yes, like I said, he has made some technical contributions, but it is dazzling you with fluff.
Much of what he was talking about does not apply to scalar technology.
He has made clear he doesn't agree with it, but many other capable people do.
5. U.S. Govt. Sting
In 2003, Laura Callahan, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's deputy chief information officer, claimed three online degrees—a bachelor's, master's and a PhD—from Hamilton University, an online college that is not accredited by any recognized agency. During the 10-month investigation, Callahan was put on leave, but continued to collect her government salary of between $128,000 and $175,000 annually. She was forced to resign in March 2004.
After the Callahan case, the Government Accounting Office ran a check of eight federal agencies. The check uncovered 463 employees who claimed online degrees from fake schools aka diploma mills. At least 28 of those caught in the sting were senior-level employees, including three unnamed managers with security clearances working at the National Nuclear Security Administration.
6. National Security Threat?
In 2005, the U.S. Secret Service investigated diploma mills, fearing they could be used by terrorists to gain access to sensitive jobs in the U.S. The Secret Service bought an online degree for a fictional person—"Mohammed Syed," a Syrian Army expert looking for U.S. employment. "Syed" received three advanced degrees in engineering and chemistry for a total of $1,277
7. U.S. Military Uncovered
U.S. military personnel, both military and civilian, were found to be using fake degrees from non accredited schools by an Alabama TV station in 2009. One of the civilian employees named by WHNT-19 was the Director of Readiness at the U.S. Army's Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM) in Huntsville, Ala. Chris Oleyte “earned” a bachelor's in human resource management from Trinity College & University (an unaccredited institution).
Originally posted by Unity_99
reply to post by kid_cudi
I completely agree that this technology needs to be watched by the people, in the hands of the people in a transformed world and all non win/win beneficial to all and everyone in every corner of the globe and all of nature as well, must be curtailed.
But we really need to go one step further and determine HOW to do this. I believe the very same avenues that need to be taken to deal with this threat, would work on a overall haulover of the elite mismanagement and hijacking of humanity, because it would entail us waking up and taking our power back permanently and revamping the system, country by country if necessary, and revamping the entire system, citizens run, transparent and open.
Originally posted by thoughtform
reply to post by Bedlam
I am not sure where you got your information regarding Bearden's educational background.
I do know he retired from the Air Force as a Lt. Col. , he has credentials. I haven't pursued his
'buying' a degree, but worth investigating.
Lt. Col Thomas E. Bearden (retd. Air Force)
PhD, MS (nuclear engineering), BS (mathematics - minor electronic engineering)
So anyway, back to the conceptual technical part, scalar potentials, (Tesla's work), and corresponding scalar technology exploit non-standard quantum behavior, much like we see exhibited around us all the time; double slit for example, where extra-dimensional behavior is exhibited.
The theory is that scalar waves are not propagated (zero-vectored) but create a quantum potential stream, (more buzzwords), with no force field amplitudes. When 2, singular frequency, potential streams intersect, an EM energy wave is manifested.
So, scalar wave potentials, completely side-step standard EM theory equations, especially in terms of energy transmitted vs. energy manifested.
Originally posted by Unity_99
www.bariumblues.com...
Good link.
Paranormal TV Presents...: Holes In Heaven: H.A.A.R.P. and Advances inTelsa Technology
HAARP AND WOODPECKER ELF WAVES !!! CAN BLOCK ANY TRANSMISSION WORLDWIDE !!!
The radio station owner, known to broadcast Blount County Commission meetings and give county residents a voice on the airwaves each day, will celebrate his 15th year at the reins of Truth Radio 1470 AM.
Grothjahn took the reins just after July 4, 1995. After a few years, he said he started calling it Truth Radio because of his efforts to make sure the truth is told.
"We are pursuing the truth, but we don't always succeed," he said.
Originally posted by Unity_99
Of course everyone is trying so hard to question sources, but I am someone who likes a whole bunch of sources, including ones where citizens connect dots, and use their heads, and make appropriate assumptions, and good speculation.
Why not test the system by taking out rogue, grass roots media? It's very logical to assume this is one of the top supsects on the list for how and why this happened.