It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Solomon Formula : Theophysical Science

page: 2
3
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 09:49 PM
link   
reply to post by dontreally
 
Keep watching, and maybe, keep learning. Hey, didn't I say go out and play and be nice!?



posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 09:58 PM
link   
reply to post by Max_TO
 
Smart man, you said it right, because that is exactly what I did, I stumbled upon it. One day I was reading thru my bible and I came across a verse, instead of reading the words and going to the next verse, I stopped and said: "This verse is giving me INSTRUCTIONS!" So, just for the heck of it, I followed those instructions, and came upon (I didn't know it at the time) The Master Key of this matter: 5 6 7.
Then I said, "Numbers aren't suppose to 'sing' like that on their own!" Then the wheels started turning.
I knew that something wasn't right..so, I took out pen and paper and pocket calculator and started asking God some serious questions: "Hey God, where EXACTLY in The Holy Bible do they first use the word
MOSES?" And I did the simple math, and bingo, and then I said: "Hey God, where EXACTLY do you make first contact with MOSES, and the numbers were singing big time...and I knew that I had found MOSES Birth Day. That was some 27-years ago. Now if you like, I will show you how to find Moses and a lot more.



posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 10:55 PM
link   
SamG2016-

Im interested in what you say and want some feedback with these numbers I see regularly EVERYWHERE that you mention.
222 333 444 555 666 777 888 999 1010 1111 1212 ( i also see an inversion of the numbers 322 and 223) regularly

I will be posting many pictures of where I have captured these numbers soon.
Thanks for sharing this knowledge.



posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 10:59 PM
link   
reply to post by SamG2016
 


Please do I am interested to hear more



posted on Oct, 16 2010 @ 12:02 AM
link   
reply to post by SamG2016
 


I think you're definitely onto something there. People don't understand that numerology played a massive role in ancient religious practices. I'm curious to see your formula for the living. Have you ever scoped out the book of Numbers? That one's a bit obvious, isn't it?



posted on Oct, 16 2010 @ 12:15 AM
link   

Originally posted by JonInMichigan
Let me try! I don’t have a bible so I’ll just pretend.

I’ll make the number 4 = “garbage” because I took out the garbage on Monday.

I’ll make the number 3 = “is” because it all depends on what the meaning of “is” is.

I’ll make the number 2 = “thread” because I have two loose threads on my shirt.

I’ll make the number 1 = “This” because this is one and one is this… isn’t it obvious?

So putting those all together in numerical order 1,2,3,4 we get:

Hmmm….

Very odd indeed:

1,2,3,4
This, thread, is, garbage

Wow… I sure wasn’t expecting that result!


Cant believe I read the thread this far to get to this...

Was pretty great by the way!.. Er the quoted above not the OP



posted on Oct, 16 2010 @ 07:29 AM
link   
reply to post by superluminal11
 
There is definitely is a pattern at work, and it has been at play since antiquity, 5103 B.C. to be exact.
The primary source of the pattern is The King James Version. You have to really look at it, not just read thru it.
You have to look and then ask 'Why?' When numbers sing like so: 111-222-333-etc., this is not singing: 369, 481,etc., now when you find the numbers singing every time a certain person is mentioned, or a certain place (like The Temple or The Ark) then you know something that is not suppose to happen naturally is in fact happening.
You have to ask not just any question, but the Right Question; this is how conspiracy and mystery is solved.
All of the oldest and Sunday school arguments are being used against this factual program. Why, because for hundreds of years (not thousands) people have been trained to follow. Once you break away from the pack, it is then that you will start to learn. Somebody arranged for us to know. And as you work thru this material, you will find that it is simple, you have to actually touch it, pen and paper, calculator in hand. I assure you, its worth the time.



posted on Oct, 16 2010 @ 07:39 AM
link   
reply to post by Gseven
 
Numbers, I had to read that book. What did we learn from that book? Nothing real. Watch this, and then tell me if you learned something: If a person is Created on the 333rd day, that person will have to be Born on the 234th day. Notice the numbers, they are singing; Now the primary source of The Solomon Formula can be found where? The Holy Bible King James Version ONLY, so you get that book, and you really LOOK: And then you ask the Right Question(s): Here is a clue: Who is 333 and 234? Where do you find this person?
What Book? What Chapter? What Verse? You have the answer on this message, now, use your own brain (not mine) to solve this mystery. 333 234. Where do you look, and who is this person?
It is that easy. And when you find this person, you will find the same numbers again and again every time this person is mentioned. Who could have created this formula, certainly not me! Get back with me with your solution.



posted on Oct, 16 2010 @ 08:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by SamG2016
reply to post by BobbinHood
"The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham."
Give every word its ALPHA-NUMERIC VALUE (ANV) A=1, B=2, etc., etc., once you do that, you will arrive at the numbers 698. And that is a FACT. Now 698 + 16-words + 63-letters = 7 7 7. And that is another FACT.

Fiction.

You're assigning numbers based on a language that didn't exist at the time any of this was written. Which I'm sure you'll use to justify that English is the real language of God or that Solomon prophesied English or something equally ridiculous. Plus, you're basing all of this on the KJV which, while the most common, is probably one of the least complete and most retranslated versions of the Bible available. Just think of it as the Michelob Ultra version of the Bible - watered down and missing most of the flavor but very popular due to superior marketing.



posted on Oct, 16 2010 @ 09:44 AM
link   
reply to post by iterationzero
 
Take everything to its logical conclusion. What is the only version of The Holy Bible that doesn't have a copyright? The King James Version. Why? Who knew 5,000 yrs. ago, that there would be an English language today. Surely you realize how important the English language is to the present World right. Who knew God knew.
Watered down. Be honest now, how many version of The Holy Bible have you studied? I mean really studied?
I had to study all of them, if today they release a Hip=Hop Version I will check into that one too! For going on 27-years, I have been taking these Bibles apart, checking to see if this or that one contained the mathematical code I call THE SOLOMON FORMULA, and I found that only one version contains the code...Why?
Watch this, immediately, name the 17th letter of the Hebrew Alphabet, and the 14th letter of the Greek alphabet, nothing comes to mind right...Right? See what I mean, if those languages were vital, we'd know them. And another thing, today's HEBREW language has absolutely nothing to do with the ancient Hebrew language, today's Hebrew language is basic brand new.



posted on Oct, 16 2010 @ 10:09 AM
link   

Originally posted by iamnot
reply to post by SamG2016
 


I have to admit I didn't even get through the whole thread but I already have to ask how 343= December 9, as well as the other equations that don't make any sense at all. I'll finish reading the thread now.

Ok I just finished reading and I have nothing more to say.
edit on 15-10-2010 by iamnot because: (no reason given)
lol is it going to take 27years to understand what he is saying?



posted on Oct, 16 2010 @ 10:27 AM
link   
reply to post by SamG2016
 


Hey, Sam, did you ever check this out: www.thechronicleproject.org... to see what you thought of it? It could be a real truth revealed. The ancient Hebrew seems to be revealing a whole lot more about the nature of God than I ever thought possible.
Have you tried your formula out on it yet?
For a short tutelage in the Chronicle project, see my thread, here:www.abovetopsecret.com...

Let me know what you think!
Jenny



posted on Oct, 16 2010 @ 10:42 AM
link   

Originally posted by SamG2016
reply to post by iterationzero
 
Take everything to its logical conclusion. What is the only version of The Holy Bible that doesn't have a copyright? The King James Version. Why? Who knew 5,000 yrs. ago, that there would be an English language today. Surely you realize how important the English language is to the present World right. Who knew God knew.

You're lack of knowledge of copyright laws is not entirely surprising. The KJV is pretty far from being the only version of the Bible not under copyright. Here's an example that proves you wrong: the Gutenberg Bible, which predates KJV by a good century and a half, is not under copyright. Here's another: the Luther Bible from ca. 1545, which predates the KJV by about fifty years is also not under copyright. Maybe you should do some fact checking before you make ridiculous assertions.


Watered down. Be honest now, how many version of The Holy Bible have you studied? I mean really studied? I had to study all of them, if today they release a Hip=Hop Version I will check into that one too! For going on 27-years, I have been taking these Bibles apart, checking to see if this or that one contained the mathematical code I call THE SOLOMON FORMULA, and I found that only one version contains the code...Why?

I've studied a fair number of them. And, yes, while the KJV is certainly the most popular (in part due to the fact that the copyright was allowed to lapse by the Church of England), it's far from being a perfect or complete translation. Keep in mind that the translators took liberties where they saw repetition in the original Hebrew, Greek, and Aramaic texts - the same word in the exact same context would be translated to different words in English, because they were more concerned with a Bible that sounded dignified rather than an accurate translation of the source material.

And really? You've studied all of them? Every single one? I'd like to see some proof of that. Can you provide an exhaustive list of every single version of the Bible you've studied? Because all I have to do is find one that you haven't to prove that you're wrong again.


Watch this, immediately, name the 17th letter of the Hebrew Alphabet, and the 14th letter of the Greek alphabet, nothing comes to mind right...Right? See what I mean, if those languages were vital, we'd know them. And another thing, today's HEBREW language has absolutely nothing to do with the ancient Hebrew language, today's Hebrew language is basic brand new.

The seventeenth letter of the Hebrew alphabet is pe, unless you want to get retardedly technical... then it's final nun. And the fourteenth letter of the Greek alphabet is xi. And, yes, that was done without looking it up. You shouldn't ask someone who was in a fraternity and is married to a Jew questions like that.

Your assertion that Hebrew is "basic brand new" is just plain false. The modern Hebrew alphabet comes from the Aramaic version used by Jews in Babylon and has been traced back to the sixth century BCE. You know when the first Hebrew alphabet was recognized? Earlier in the same millennia. Amazing. And a speaker of modern English would have difficulty reading and understanding parts of the original version of the KJV, because the language has changed significantly in the last four hundred years. And it continues to change. So keep thinking you've found some kind of code in there, even though most of your assertions are false, and in another hundred or so years it'll be gone because the KJV will have been retranslated to meet the needs of the world population yet again.
edit on 16/10/2010 by iterationzero because: added more



posted on Oct, 16 2010 @ 10:49 AM
link   
reply to post by iterationzero
 


Oh, goody! You are another I would like to see check this site out:www.thechronicleproject.org...

Please let me know what you think!



posted on Oct, 16 2010 @ 11:41 AM
link   
reply to post by Max_TO
 
Better than hear, let's do some real work. Do you own or have in your access a King James Version Bible? 2 3 4. Who is 234? Where would you find this person. Trust the numbers. This is The Solomon Formula.
No guessing around, you have to use your own brain (not mine), see, in all things, it is for YOU to verify or refute all incoming data that you will let your brain retain. When you solve this simple test, then I will show you things that will blow your mind. 2 3 4. The Holy Bible. Where do you find this person. I repeat, trust the math.



posted on Oct, 16 2010 @ 11:51 AM
link   
reply to post by iterationzero
 
College boy huh! What was that about the Church of England letting their Copyright lapse...oh, they did that, exactly when? Right. The Solomon Formula involves simple mathematics. Are you one of those people who write out the word God like so G-d, the reason I ask is because I couldn't help but notice that you also used the
BCE term for elling historical time. BCE very new age. A scholarly attempt to appear more scholary, yes very nice. So you know Hebrew and Greek, if you will, impress me by writing out in two sentences and in the two languages: "the quick red fox jumped over the sleeping brown dog." What passes for the Hebrew language today under no circumstances would be recognizable in any epoch of antiquity. You should have waited, or at least finished your plate. Instant indignation only bespeaks of an impatient sense of self. You should always taste a foreign dish before you say you don't like it. College huh!



posted on Oct, 16 2010 @ 12:04 PM
link   
reply to post by jennybee35
 
Just finished reading your first thread and some of the comments you received. I have to know, is the chronicles material, like a movie series, I will check the series out for sure. Let me test your willingness to really learn: mankind(everything) has three exact dates with history. 1. A Creation Day (i.e. when you enter the womb.)
2. A Birth Day. 3. A Death Day. I found this number in the Bible: 266-days of gestation. Okay, say this person was Created on the 333rd day. When would this person be Born? on the 234th day...do you concur?
Do you have a Bible (KJV...ONLY)? Now you have the tools. Who is this person. Trust the mathematics.
What Book? What Chapter? What Verse? Believe, the Creator of this matter, wants us (of understanding) to KNOW.



posted on Oct, 16 2010 @ 12:18 PM
link   
reply to post by SamG2016
 


Okay, I'll have to be very honest with you here: the math just eludes me. Not because it doesn't exist, but because I am a disater at it! When you ask if I concur, I have to honestly say I can't, 'cause I don't understand it!
I do have the bible, it is the only literature I can use to proof what is presented to me. I realize it has been tampered with, but rely on the Spirit of Truth to guide me.
I will have to do much more study and prayer to see if I can be made to understand your formula. Thanks for the extra work!
Don't give up on me! If it is true, then I will receive the right understanding. Father doesn't give different truths to believers, does He? All things that are truth come into agreement, right?

ETA: No, the Chronicle Project is not a series or movie. It is a Christian Hebrew group trying to bring out the true Word, restore it to it's original meaning. Go to their homepage and read their notes. It is definitely worth any thruth-seekers time and effort!
edit on 10/16/10 by jennybee35 because: Add clarification



posted on Oct, 16 2010 @ 03:03 PM
link   
reply to post by jennybee35
 
Okay Jennybee35, I am going to break with protocol and really help you to understand. Ready:
I asked: "My God, where exactly in the Bible is the name MOSES first used?" That is considered a Right Question, so I immediately went to: Book 2 (Exodus). The I went to Chapter 2 Verse 10. And then I counted the words until I got to the 22nd word "MOSES", and then I did the math, like so:
Book.....................................2
Chap. & Verse....................210
Word #.................................22
TOTALS 234

Next Right Question: I ask: "My God, where exactly do you first make contact with MOSES?" I started reading and looking, and there at Book 2, Chapter 3, Verse 4: and Moses said: "HERE AM I", what does a newborn baby say the second it is born: It cries out to the world in the only language it knows and says Here Am I.
But wait, there is more!
I then examine Book 2, Chapter 2, and I noticed that the name MOSES was used exactly 8-times. Why? I knew there was a good reason, if not, why not use Moses 65-times....why 8-times? The numbers I was dealing with were 2 2 & 8, what did they mean. 22 and 8?? Then it hit me: 22nd day 8th month (August), behold The Almighty Gods grande formulae at work: from January to the end July = 212-days + 22-days = 2 3 4=Moses' Birth Day. Not only did The Almighty arrange for English to be used, He is also using our Calendar! And this matterial does it again and again, when ever Moses' Birth is brought up. And that is THE SOLOMON FORMULA I stumbled upon. I hope you understand this, because if you did, that means, this matter is FOR YOU. The wannabe scholars have been looking over my shoulders for too long now, shaking their heads tsk, tsk, they do not have a clue. You have said what it can't be without first knowing what it is, and they call themselves scholars...yeah right!



posted on Oct, 16 2010 @ 03:29 PM
link   
reply to post by superluminal11
 


In the book of Genesis it states that there are six days of creation. Yet many talk about the creation week – or seven days, and the Christian Bible views the number seven as the number of completeness.

In other words, whenever you sing a Psalm, it is music to the ears. But it was originally intended to be music for the soul as well or the “secret ear.” Thus by changing the notes, high matrices of thought and to a great extent well being, was squelched. Now it is time to recover these missing notes.”

These original sound frequencies were apparently used in Ancient Gregorian Chants, such as the great hymn to St. John the Baptist, along with others that church authorities say were lost centuries ago. The chants and their special tones were believed to impart tremendous spiritual blessings when sung in harmony during religious masses. These powerful frequencies were rediscovered by Dr. Joseph Puleo as described in the book Healing Codes for the Biological Apocalypse by Dr. Leonard Horowitz. I give honor to both of these gentleman for the part they’ve played in helping return these lost frequencies back to humanity.

Additional Information:

Further research states that, “Pope Johannes later became a saint – Saint Iohannes – and then the scale was changed. The seventh note “Si” was added from his name. “Si” later became “Ti.” These changes significantly altered the frequencies sung by the masses. The alterations also weakened the spiritual impact of the Church’s hymns. Because the music held mathmatic resonance, frequencies capable of spiritually inspiring mankind to be more “Godlike,” the changes affected alterations in conceptual thought as well, further distancing humanity from God.

The Six Solfeggio Frequencies include:

UT – 396 Hz – Liberating Guilt and Fear
RE – 417 Hz – Undoing Situations and Facilitating Change
MI – 528 Hz – Transformation and Miracles (DNA Repair)
FA – 639 Hz – Connecting/Relationships
SOL – 741 Hz – Awakening Intuition
LA – 852 Hz – Returning to Spiritual Order

For example, the third note, frequency 528, relates to the note MI on the scale and derives from the phrase “MI-ra gestorum” in Latin meaning “miracle.” Stunningly, this is the exact frequency used by genetic biochemists to repair broken DNA – the genetic blueprint upon which life is based!

Source: www.solfeggiotones.com...

The Hebrew language is actually one where the letters sound like the frequency and are based on a "code" which is based on the Solfoggio Tones, according to the source above. A very fascinating postulation, if actually true.
edit on 16-10-2010 by trekwebmaster because: Additional Information



new topics

top topics



 
3
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join