It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
(Reuters) - Careful calibration of a U.S. dollar devaluation looks to be the only way to avert the sort of currency war flagged by Brazil and others, leaving G20 powers the unenviable task of agreeing some control of the process.
The top world economies, shaken by three years of financial turmoil, are scrambling to cap or weaken their currencies in a fight over fragile global demand for exports -- prompting retaliatory capital curbs and damaging trade rows.
Faced with fiscal exhaustion, hostile electorates and booming China's refusal to allow a rapid rise of the yuan, the U.S., Japan and possibly Britain seem set on another bout of money printing to reboot their ailing economies and weaken their currencies.
Fast-growing developing countries with flexible exchange rates are caught in the crossfire and are reacting fast, leading to Brazil on Monday to double taxes on foreign inflows and South Korea on Tuesday to threaten curbs on currency trading.
France, which takes G20's rotating chair next month, has denied weekend reports of "secret negotiations" with China. But it's clear that patience in the status quo is running out.
"To avoid the damaging consequences of continued unilateral action ... a core group of major economies needs to agree urgently on a multilateral and coordinated package of policy measures," Charles Dallara, director of banking group the Institute for International Finance, said on Monday.
U.S. trade threats against China over the yuan showed the "counterproductive nature of unilateral policy," Dallara said in an open letter to the International Monetary Fund's annual meeting.
"There is competitive devaluation going on," said Johnson, a former director at billionaire George Soros' fund management firm and former economist at the U.S. Senate Banking Committee.
David Shairp, strategist at JPMorgan Asset Management, reckons the move to emerging currencies could now accelerate.
According to fund tracker EPFR, emerging market bond fund inflows, with local currency mandates taking more than half, have soared to almost $40 billion so far this year from less than $700 million in the first nine months of 2009.
Net flows to emerging market equities in the third quarter, at more than $30 billion, were some 50 percent up on the first six months of the year. And year-to-date inflows of almost $50 billion compare to a net exit from developed equity funds of almost $79 billion and an outflow of half a trillion from western cash funds.
The speed and stability of these portfolio streams may be a legitimate concern, but longer-term flows play the same tune.
ThomsonReuters data shows emerging market mergers and acquisitions this year, at $480 billion, were up 63 percent on the same period of 2009. Crucially, this is not "hot" money.
"No one is sleeping on the job," Brazil's finance minister, Guido Mantega, said on Monday. "We risk having a trade war and that's the worry. (But) it is preferable that we take coordinated measures instead of isolated measures."
The Republic of Korea is honored to chair the Group of Twenty in 2010.
The G20 was established in 1999, in the wake of the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis, to bring together major advanced and emerging economies to stabilize the global financial market.
Since its inception, the G20 has held annual Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors' Meetings and discussed measures to promote the financial stability of the world and to achieve a sustainable economic growth and development.
To tackle the financial and economic crisis that spread across the globe in 2008, the G20 members were called upon to further strengthen international cooperation. Accordingly, the G20 Summits have been held in Washington in 2008, and in London and Pittsburgh in 2009.
The concerted and decisive actions of the G20, with its balanced membership of developed and developing countries, helped the world deal effectively with the current financial and economic crisis. The G20 has already delivered a number of significant and concrete outcomes. It committed to implement the unprecedented and most coordinated expansionary macroeconomic policies, including the fiscal expansion of US$5 trillion and the unconventional monetary policy instruments; significantly enhance the financial regulations, notably by the establishment of the Financial Stability Board(FSB); and substantially strengthen the International Financial Institutions(IFIs), including the expansion of resources and the improvement of precautionary lending facilities of the IFIs.
Reflecting on these achievements and recognizing that more needs to be done to ensure a strong, sustained and balanced global recovery, the G20 Leaders at Pittsburgh Summit designated the G20 as the premier forum for international economic cooperation. In 2010, the June Summit will be held in Canada, and the November Summit will be held in the Republic of Korea.
Building on past achievements and close cooperation among members, the G20 will double its efforts in 2010 to help the world make a successful transition from global recovery to stronger, more sustainable and balanced growth. We look forward to working closely with our Troika colleagues, the UK and France, and drawing on valuable experiences of other G20 members. The Republic of Korea will spare no effort to ensure success in 2010.
Originally posted by carlitomoore
Is this when the bubble is finally going to burst!? The next G20 summit is within weeks and they are going to take action no matter what, it is just a case of who is going to get the best deal. America, UK and Japan are due to start more quantitive easing, the gold markets are being inflated at a ridiculous level, the IMF has just but the roadblocks on hte British hosuing market, THIS CANNOT SUSTAIN.
Originally posted by carlitomoore
reply to post by infinite
This is all true... I don't understand your post though, unless your saying that there will be no war because people have already decided and there is nothing to fight over!?
Infinite I have read many of your posts on economics among others. What do you see coming out of the next G20? Anything?
The Federal Opposition says the world could be on the verge of a trade war if tensions over currency exchange rates are not resolved soon. World finance leaders have finished two days of talks at the International Monetary Fund, but the issue of currency reform remains unresolved. The Australian dollar has soared in value against a weakening US dollar, and looks set to achieve parity or even bypass the greenback. The Opposition's acting Treasury spokesman, Andrew Robb, says some countries are deliberately devaluing their currencies, which could prompt other countries to retaliate.
"All of these major countries around the world that have got huge debt problems are artificially devaluing their currencies. And what we're seeing is the start of a currency war and that has very serious consequences if it's allowed to continue," he said.
Quick refresher on how short selling works. Shorts borrow a share, sell it immediately, then if the bet pays off they later buy it back at a lower price, pocket the difference and return the share to the person they borrowed it from.
Naked short selling is when an investor essentially shorts a stock that he hasn’t actually borrowed. During the worst of the financial crisis some corporate executives blamed the tactic for their companies’ plunging stock prices. In the U.S., regulators put new temporary rules in place to curb the practice in the fall of 2008. That rule was made permanent in July 2009.
Why is a naked CDS different from a naked short sale of bonds and stocks?
Buying a credit default swap in effect buys insurance against the risk of a default by either a company or country. This is essentially a short sale, since the holder profits from the contract if the entity does default. Even before that happens, the CDS holder benefits if the outlook for the entity deteriorates, because the insurance premium for that default risk will rise and the holder can profit by selling the insurance and closing out their trade.
Some investors holding debt issued by an entity buy credit insurance to protect their portfolios from such a risk, but most buying comes from investors who simply want to express a negative bet. As such, buying credit protection without owning any of the entity’s debt is a “naked” short bet. source