Pentagon Survivor April Gallop: "It's obvious the official story was fabricated..."

Originally posted by benoni
Remember.... To accept the official fairytale you have to believe that the massive plane created a hole less than 20ft in diameter in the pentagon wall....20feet!

No, you don't. This isn't true, it's never been true, it's not remotely based in fact. It is utter rubbish.

The picture is at the start of the last page. Perhaps you could take a few seconds to look at it.

reply to post by benoni


Evidence of a holographed object though appeared as an unmanned aerial vehicle.....click here for more.....

Preset charges had gone off in the building with debris found from Pentagon on the lot which evidences an 'outward' explosion. It's all there folks. It doesn't take counter terrorism training to 'get this' though it does help a tad bit.

I understand many war 'games' went on that day.
What do U think?
or rather know.....

Next.....

reply to post by Yukitup


It's called primer. I know, why bring more facts into it.

reply to post by vipertech0596


I agree, facts can be quite damning.
No one should ever be afraid or ashamed of the truth.
It is and will always be known as Is?
To be a Was, Justice must be served.....

Mods, any guess as to how many intelligence ageny personnel are to view this thread?
Makes me wonder why so many of the criminals keep reappearing on your television sets?
Could some be holographs as well?
I believe some are and many more will be in the near future.

This has been a 'public service' announcement for unlike some folks, I'm not hired to be a security consultant. Freedom isn't free, it must be defended, free of charge.
Why, cause freedom isn't free.
Do you understand?
Yes, you do.

NXT.....

Originally posted by chaeone86

And if this were a 'faked' attack by nefarious government agents, what possible reason would they target the Pentagon of all places? Why not choose Disney World?

Really?

Here's an interesting post from a member at Pilots For 9/11 Truth.

They destroyed the wing that housed the military auditors and their equipment who had been brought in to track down the $2.3 - 2.6 Trillion that Don Rumsfeld said on 9/10/2001 was "missing" or "lost" and was "needed" to be "found."
Those auditors were bombed and some were killed.
The company in charge of the renovations of the west wing of the Pentagon, the wing targeted was AMEC. www.amec.com... www.amec.com... AMEC was based in London. It was busted for investing fraud a while ago. It was also contracted to do two other noteworthy things aside from the refortification of the west wing of the Pentagon.
1) It "renovated" Larry Silverstein's Word Trade Center Complex.
2) It cleaned up both the Pentagon and WTC. AMEC are the folks running around in space suits at both locations. Clearly, they had some info about the dangers posed by breathing the air at both locations.
Also interesting is how AMEC's "renovation" contracts at both the Pentagon and WTC were scheduled to be completed by the first of September, 2001. Note how it was one of the Pentagon project coordinators who signed AMEC into these contracts who served as an eyewitness of the supposed F77 impact, conveniently testifying to the press that he had held wing sections and whatnot.
In this instance, you've got a foreign private military contractor that was probably one of the foremost figures in the events of 9/11. Enough information in this post to obtain a warrant? (IMG:pilotsfor911truth.org...)

reply to post by okbmd


I think that because she was there, she KNEW there was no plane. If there is no plane, why didn't AA report that, unless they are involved?

From my link above:

An individual is complicit in a crime if he/she is aware of its occurrence and has the ability to report the crime, but fails to do so. As such, the individual effectively allows criminals to carry out a crime despite possibly being able to stop them, either directly or by contacting the authorities, thus making the individual a de-facto accessory to the crime rather than an innocent bystander.

Did you really need that explanation, Doc?

reply to post by Dogdish


Negative.
Her evidence was not brought forward for review.
There was no discovery session.
Some members implicated in the 9/11 'act of terrorism' were involved in concealing/prohibiting the evidence from the 'official' 911 investigation.

Like a broken record spinning into one's conscience.
Who thought they'd ever act.
'I' did.
The jury is still out.
Who's In?

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/caeb4d6a4003.jpg[/atsimg]


You reckon a plane did this???????

You need to wake up!!

And exponent...
What actually is it that you want me to look at on your little picture that can be verified by Google Earth??

All that photoshopped smoke tends to obscure dont ya think!!??

Hey folks, any idea why my posts aren't registering in the ATS real time post count? Click here to compare my post time count stampt with the ATS post time stamp.....

It's been this way for quite some time.
Who's paying attention?
Who can confirm my posts are being read in a 'public' way?
Should there be an investigation?
Seems just another conspiracy.
Again, who's paying attention?

Comchck Over.....
Just trying to make your jobs a little easier on the ^mind^.
In the video, it's odd to see the audience sitting 'down'.
I see a parallel or two.
You?

Know what I mean.....

She sued AA in hopes of something not adding up during the investigation thus exposing to more people the fact that no plane hit the pentagon and leaving everyone with the intrigue of what did hit the building
Smart lady

Don't mean to rock anybody's boat and go off topic, but do you know why the cross section of the P-Gon collapsed approximately 20-30 minutes after impact and not during impact? Did the Muppets screw up and underestimate the strength of your run-of-the-mill office building? Don't tell anybody, but the collapse should have coincided with the impact of the phantom commercial airliner...not a half hour later. Oh well, when it comes to such a complex operation, screw ups are to be expected.

Originally posted by benoni
And exponent...
What actually is it that you want me to look at on your little picture that can be verified by Google Earth??

All that photoshopped smoke tends to obscure dont ya think!!??

The plane entry hole is clearly visible, occupying about 80% of the wingspan on the ground floor, the the damage to the first floor indicates the fuselage entry point.

You can deny it all you like, but the fact of the matter is that it shows what people believe doesn't exist, a 'plane sized hole'.

When you start investigating yourself, instead of just parroting off what other truther sites tell you, you'll realise that in fact a plane sized hole does exist there.

reply to post by exponent

And when you look at this picture, , taken before yours, you see part of the structure is blocking the path that you are saying the plane took.

Exponent, you have been shown this picture earlier in this thread.
So why are you pushing an obvious lie?

Originally posted by Kailassa
And when you look at this picture, , taken before yours, you see part of the structure is blocking the path that you are saying the plane took.

What part of the structure? A couple of columns that survived but were badly deformed? Or the generator trailer on the right which was mysteriously seriously damaged despite being outside the builidng and in the path of the plane.

Exponent, you have been shown this picture earlier in this thread.
So why are you pushing an obvious lie?

I don't understand why you think there are any lies going on. The picture you posted shows the outline of the plane impact quite clearly.

reply to post by Dogdish


And yet another commonly repeated quarter truth comes to the surface. The 2.3 trillion 'dollars'.

Here is the transcript of Rumsfeld's speech on Sept 10, 2001

www.defense.gov...

(entitled "DOD Acquisition and Logistics Excellence Week Kickoff—Bureaucracy to Battlefield")

It was never missing cash. And it was known about long before 9/11/01.

PBS Newshour Feb 12, 2001

www.pbs.org...



As posted on the Associated Press, March 3, 2000

Pentagon's finances in disarray

By JOHN M. DONNELLY The Associated Press 03/03/00 5:44 PM Eastern

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The military's money managers last year made almost $7 trillion in adjustments to their financial ledgers in an attempt to make them add up, the Pentagon's inspector general said in a report released Friday.

The Pentagon could not show receipts for $2.3 trillion of those changes, and half a trillion dollars of it was just corrections of mistakes made in earlier adjustments.

Rumsfeld's speech was about the bloated bureaucracy at the Pentagon and the haphazard way in which it went about adding computer systems to keep track of things....most of which couldnt talk to other systems in the same building. It was a problem he was determined to fix, not cover up.

But that doesnt stop truthers from lying about it.

Originally posted by exponent

Originally posted by Kailassa
And when you look at this picture, , taken before yours, you see part of the structure is blocking the path that you are saying the plane took.

What part of the structure? A couple of columns that survived but were badly deformed? Or the generator trailer on the right which was mysteriously seriously damaged despite being outside the builidng and in the path of the plane.

The cement columns, blocking the entry hole you marked out are deformed?
Not half as deformed as they'd be if your putative airliner had passed through them.

What do you think they were made of?
Miracle gel?

reply to post by vipertech0596


Please remember that we are here on the angle of opposing the OS.
Now why would we be convinced by your post citing www.defense.gov and www.pbs.org urls and a speech by good ol' Rumsie?

GREAT post Dogdish! The info you posted would be a very big part of the 9/11 investigation WHEN it reopens.
April Gallop may have the answers to many things!

reply to post by Seti_Starr


Yep, and anytime truthers start telling lies and spreading misinformation, I will be here to post reality. I have too many friends and family who were directly affected by that day and in the years that have followed to sit back and let the ignorance of the "truth" movement run rampant.

I tend to agree that to not have air defences of any kind around the headquarters of one of the largest military infrastructures in the world is not only irresponsible and arrogrant, it's criminally irresponsible.

I for one don't believe for a second that there are absolutely no air defences around the Pentagon, or around any other US Government or military sites. I believe that the defences were deliberately put on standdown on 9/11 around the United States.

My biggest red flag around 9/11 is that "the national air defense system was practicing a drill around the exact same scenario, and we thought it was part of the drill". This is EXACTLY what happened on 7/7 in London. When the subway stations were attacked, there "just happened" to be military units at all four subway stations (and ONLY at the specific ones that were attacked) who were "running an exercise around a subway attack".

The biggest red flag around 7/7 was that they claimed the terrorists were carrying the bombs on the trains and busses, but the floor plates were blown IN, not OUT in all the pictures afterwards, suggesting that the bombs were planted UNDERNEATH, not inside.

Too much to be called a coincidence, sorry folks, not buying what you're selling.

reply to post by babybunnies


So how would you feel about installing systems that accidentally shoot down airliners a couple times a year?

The Pentagon sits right in the middle of the approach/departure area of a busy airport. How many airliners shooting missed approaches are you willing to shoot down? Not to mention, shooting down an airliner over a bunch of office buildings would be pretty messy.......