It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Vanchatron
I didn't say everything in the "documentaries" is lies. I said they are fluff, without substance. You act as if they are the "proof" we need. They offer no proof.
edit on 10/3/2010 by Phage because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by OldDragger
reply to post by dusk18
For the ten millionth time, please post a CREDIBLE link to Mitchell ever saying any such thing!
He has expressed his opinion, just his opinion.
..but I've also been in military circles and intelligence circles that knows, beneath the surface of what has been public knowledge, that, yes, we have been visited.
Originally posted by OldDragger
reply to post by MarrsAttax
You are correct, he did say it.
But, I don't believe him. He has nothing to substantiate his claims.
Originally posted by Master Shen long
So your saying pilots, police, air force, scientists, commisioned military officers to name but a few who have come forward with multiple eye witness acconuts dont count of evidence as visitation?
Originally posted by eennoor
THEY DON'T COUNT AS EVIDENCE.
Did those pilots, police, air force, scientists, military officers go up to the UFO and ask the pilots of the UFO where they are from? NO. Since they don't know who is flying it, it's not proof of visitation! It could be humans flying it.
[edit on 10-7-2010 by eennoo]
Originally posted by OldDragger Can any of you show ONE thing that isn't? That actually is evidence, even hinting of proof?
Seems a little odd that after all these years, all this "study' there is zilch, doesn't it.
AND! NOTICE I said proof, not "unexplained", as in, this photo is unexplained. Unexplained is only proof of it being unexplained!
Not unconfirmable "eyewitness" accounts.
You want to know why UFOlogy isn't a science? Because there isn't anything to study.
EVERY one of you that "believes' does so on faith, not reason or science.
So, I challenge you! Steer me to just ONE, just ONE bit of proof!
Originally posted by Enter Ruin
There, what do I win?