It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Unity_99
The tests in life are about Love & Equality.
Originally posted by sphinx551
Originally posted by Unity_99
The tests in life are about Love & Equality.
Isn't the test in the 3rd Density about wisdom and knowledge? Is it not until the 4th Density Positive Polarity that people should focus on Love?
Thanks.
edit on 3-10-2010 by sphinx551 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by mimroro
Pathetic... All I can say... :
Originally posted by undeadfilth
Love everyone, eh? I'm sorry but the most important person in my life is my self and I do nothing unless it directly improves my state of being. Life is too damned short to waste my love on ingrates that don't deserve it, and anyone that gets in my way will be stamped under my boots as I elevate myself even higher and grasp momentary happiness in this pointless short struggle called life. If I saw someone on the street spouting the same moronic, "love everyone," speech while running up to me to hug me and spread your love you'd probably have a hard time learning to love the new knife that I embedded in your chest cavity. The fact that you can love people like the ones that rule our world and attempt to control and kill everyone that doesn't agree with their ideals or get in the way of their stranglehold on everyone makes you about equal in my eyes to these lovely stained rings i can't seem to get rid of in my toilet(and trust me, I have a mangled toilet brush in my bathroom to prove it). Get off of your self righteous pedestal and come back down to the rest of the lower class pieces of # like everyone else that is forced to work for a living to barely pay the bills. I don't even have enough time to go back to school, let alone spread love*cough*herpes*cough*. I have no problem "loving" some random chick I just met, but seriously I'm to the point where we need more HATE and ANGER. Those are the emotions that get # done. Without those we can't take this world back and make it the way it should be. I HATE people like you that try to domesticate yourself and everyone else. If you feel passionately about something you first have to get angry about it, I'm not talking mildly irritated, I mean straight up and pissed! You need to actually get out of the house and stop numbing yourself with t.v., drugs, alcohol, whatever and realize the true source of all your problems which is the system of fascism that we live in and take up arms and destroy it. Absolutely and completely there is no other way to be able to obtain true happiness. Once I'm able to live my life happily, I'll think about sharing my "love".
Oh and just as an after thought, what is this love you speak of. I know only of a feeling of familiarity and/or lust. This feeling is not immortal and will fade. There is no mystical emotion you speak of that I can relate to at all.
Tagging those words onto a dangerous mix of pseudo-spiritual "free your mind" talk spun in a matrix of slave thinking does not exonerate you from the responsibility of your intention. My hope is that you work for the government. If that's the case, you will go lightly on yourself because you are just doing your job. But if you are indeed sincere, I need to tell you, apparently, that attempting to help slaves become free without their having the desire for deconstruction of the ego-based paradigm is not only unlawful, but it certainly will come back to bite you in the rear. When you make allowances for atheists in your "plan", you invite the insane. Only the insane sincerely believe in a nonconscious, nonvolitional origin of the universe. Therefore your "plan" is hopelessly broken, just like all the grassroots Native American revivals are broken for the opposite reason: they give honor to subordinate authorities which should go to the Supreme Authority. I'm not morally judging anyone: I'm just evaluating the level of consciousness present in their interactions with the universe and the Creator.
Originally posted by IAMIAM
reply to post by seamus
My friend,
I gave you the benefit of the doubt and went back an re-read my initial post. The part you seem to not grasp is this:
"Trust not these words, but take them to your heart and weigh them. If they come as truth to you, then do with it what your heart compels you. "
I'm trying to save you some grief by sharing my perspective, but it's always the same. You can't save someone the grief necessary to bring them face to face with the One. And why would you?
If you do not find value in my words in your heart, don't give them any weight. Dismiss them. Find something we do agree on and lets discuss that. If you cannot find anything you agree with, then share your perspective, which you have.
You reckon? I'll agree with that, except that I believe that our interactions provide more angles from which to view both of our perspectives. With those angles, some will lean toward resonance with my message. Some will lean toward resonance with yours. But at least they will know your perspective better for my having attempted to draw out your so-called authority for making your statements (and you providing the scant logical backing you have). You could serve them better by providing some counter-points, rather than giving me the brotherly brush-off, as you have now numerous times. Perhaps your concern is not genuinely for them?
It is not about you being right and me being wrong or vice versa.
All contract are Caveat Emptor, folks... remember that when you decide which road you're on.
This thread was posted in the "Grey Area" which is for "Personal Stories" thus, this is my personal story.
With Love,
Your Brother
Originally posted by seamus
Tagging those words onto a dangerous mix of pseudo-spiritual "free your mind" talk spun in a matrix of slave thinking does not exonerate you from the responsibility of your intention.
Originally posted by seamusMy hope is that you work for the government. If that's the case, you will go lightly on yourself because you are just doing your job. But if you are indeed sincere, I need to tell you, apparently, that attempting to help slaves become free without their having the desire for deconstruction of the ego-based paradigm is not only unlawful, but it certainly will come back to bite you in the rear.
Originally posted by seamusWhen you make allowances for atheists in your "plan", you invite the insane. Only the insane sincerely believe in a nonconscious, nonvolitional origin of the universe.
Originally posted by seamusTherefore your "plan" is hopelessly broken, just like all the grassroots Native American revivals are broken for the opposite reason: they give honor to subordinate authorities which should go to the Supreme Authority. I'm not morally judging anyone: I'm just evaluating the level of consciousness present in their interactions with the universe and the Creator.
Originally posted by seamusYou reckon? I'll agree with that, except that I believe that our interactions provide more angles from which to view both of our perspectives. With those angles, some will lean toward resonance with my message. Some will lean toward resonance with yours. But at least they will know your perspective better for my having attempted to draw out your so-called authority for making your statements (and you providing the scant logical backing you have).
Originally posted by seamusYou could serve them better by providing some counter-points, rather than giving me the brotherly brush-off, as you have now numerous times. Perhaps your concern is not genuinely for them?
Originally posted by IAMIAM
Originally posted by seamus
Tagging those words onto a dangerous mix of pseudo-spiritual "free your mind" talk spun in a matrix of slave thinking does not exonerate you from the responsibility of your intention.
My friend, I mixed in no such thing as "free your mind" talk. In fact it is you who has come here with such talk. My message was "Know your self" and "Love one another".
You still are operating in a separated, fractured paradigm. There IS only ONE being! But within this simulation, there are rules for interactions; laws, if you will. Like laws in Physics, they aren't based on morality but upon energy flow. By putting yourself forward as an enlightener of burdens, you bring upon yourself the responsibility for those who decide to follow you, tag disclaimer notwithstanding, because the essence of the disclaimer is counter to the essence of your message.
Originally posted by seamusMy hope is that you work for the government. If that's the case, you will go lightly on yourself because you are just doing your job. But if you are indeed sincere, I need to tell you, apparently, that attempting to help slaves become free without their having the desire for deconstruction of the ego-based paradigm is not only unlawful, but it certainly will come back to bite you in the rear.
Who's laws am I violating, not by freeing slaves, but by reminding people that they are NOT slaves. There is only one being in the universe that has dared to enslave Man, and it goes by many names, so who do you call this being who pretends authority he does not have?
Without a doubt that is true. But the universe is not a moral code, or a clinging to social norms. The universe is the dance of the One Infinite Creator. You are trying to make applesauce with oranges.
Man has been lead astray from the Creator by the many false images of that divine being, which is incomprehensible to any man and ineffable by any man. While many men refuse to accept these many man created idols, these same men follow, in their heart, his word as spoken in their conscience. Thus, many an Atheist is in fact, more devout than those who profess to be devout.
Tell me, does this "free will" include the ability to choose to harm another against that other's will? (Of course that would also apply for deists, theists, monists, and pantheists.) I'll let you know now, that is a "litmus test" question.
Either way, they are still free by the authority of their free will, if they so choose, and it is not my place to judge.
That's funny, I thought we had yet another 2 years and 2 months before 12-25-2012...
My "Plan" is far from broken my friend, it has already succeeded.
Really? You have actual ultimate authority over yourself? Wow! You must be a lot higher on the ladder than I am!
I claim no authority over anyone other than myself. I leave the authority over others to themselves.
So, that the readers can discern for themselves more clearly between our two messages, please tell us where you draw your authority from?
My concern is great indeed.
Therefore, why don't you come right out and tell us the source of your doctrine. Give us a name that we may research, give some insight into YOUR dogma, most especially your authority to come tell anyone they are wrong and violating laws.
Oh, I don't push. I present. I allow. Pushing is yang. Enlightenment comes through yin action of nonaction. Acceptance.
I am calling you out my friend. If you wish to continue this game then reveal for us this path of enlightenment you are pushing.