It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
There is, has, and always will be a certain percentage of the population that will use whatever means neccessary to further their goals, however if you want to debate this further start a new thread.
How so? Do you mean roofies or something? How is seduction and romance the same as rape?
Originally posted by v01i0
reply to post by hotbakedtater
Many women marry their rapists. The rape only happens in more civilized form, seduced by chocolate and romance - altogether it is very much a same thing.
-v
Originally posted by v01i0
The ends are same in both cases - getting laid, another by physical force, another by mental force. Not much distinction in my mind.
Originally posted by v01i0
In essence, when the purpose of seduction is merely to get laid and then abandon your partner. Both serve same function. Of course the method applied is distinct, but if the end is same, what's the difference when there are tears in the end of both actions? I do not regard a seducer much better than the rapist. Yes, there is consent in the seduction, but would the true intentions be well known, the consent would be questionable, no?
And when it comes to the women, their only means of rape is seduction, right?
Originally posted by hotbakedtater
reply to post by v01i0
So all forms of sex, consensual or not are equal to rape in your book.
Originally posted by gimme_some_truth
I just don't know. It is a disgusting solution.
I never understood the cultures that blame the women when a man holds them down and rapes them... I mean, it is rape... Against their will! How could you even think about blaming the victim? It goes against the meaning of rape!
Originally posted by LadySkadi
Fail. Try again. There is no law that says consensual sex = rape.
Originally posted by v01i0
reply to post by wigit
Nope.
The case of Julian Assange hints to right direction. Google it if you aren't aware already.
The ends are same in both cases - getting laid, another by physical force, another by mental force. Not much distinction in my mind.
-v
Originally posted by hotbakedtater
What type of society would have a newspaper that ran such a headline?
Originally posted by v01i0
reply to post by sezsue
During the attempted rape, this change to "say no" also exists. You can kick the balls of the attacker, you can pepperspray his eyes, you can hit your nails into his eyes - problem is same as with seduction, many are too weak to resist, so they just yield to the attacker/seducer.
C'mon people, I am not saying that rape and seduction are exactly the same thing. All I am saying that there is very much common in them, when stripped out unnecessary conceptions...
-v
This does not even make sense, and it is the type of thing that makes me very glad to live in a civilized country.
How can a country be civilized if they actually consider marrying a rapist a solution to the female's virtue??