It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mryanbrown
1. Aircraft speed exceeded theoretical limits.
2. Buildings fell at free fall speed.
3. Thermate discovered in debris.
Originally posted by mryanbrown
I can cite authoritative sources which rebut your authoritive sources.
Originally posted by dereks
Originally posted by mryanbrown
I can cite authoritative sources which rebut your authoritive sources.
No you cannot - simply by looking at the collapse of WTC1 & 2 you can clearly see that the debris falling off the buildings is falling at free fall speed, and the building is collapsing slower than that. The only people making the claim that WTC1 & 2 fell at free fall speed is the damn fool conspiracy theory sites -
Originally posted by TVeducated
reply to post by L1U2C3I4F5E6R
If you believe the official storey, I truly feel sorry for you as you truely are brainwashed.
No need for a second line.
Originally posted by mryanbrown
So you're unable to cite any authoritative sources then?
At least I had the decency to attempt to have a rational adult discussion
Originally posted by Myendica
i believe they state, "at nearly free-fall speed."
Originally posted by jfj123
So you're saying that massive amounts of personnel have been planning this for 50 plus years and not one person has spoke up? Not one person has said the wrong thing? Not one photo has slipped out? Not one invoice popped up? This makes your story even more absurd sounding than before.
Originally posted by mryanbrown
reply to post by dereks
Oh I'm sorry, they were debunked because you said so? Or because a source you stand under said so? Where is your authoritarian source from?
EDIT: This is the point I'm making.
I can cite authoritative sources which rebut your authoritive sources. And you're capable of doing the same thing. (I would hope).
So when you have authoritative versus authoritative, who is correct? Whoever we CHOOSE to believe. Does that make either correct? No.
So I made the point that the real issue is that the truth is being hidden. Not what the truth is.
edit on 22-9-2010 by mryanbrown because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by GoldenFleece
Originally posted by jfj123
So you're saying that massive amounts of personnel have been planning this for 50 plus years and not one person has spoke up? Not one person has said the wrong thing? Not one photo has slipped out? Not one invoice popped up? This makes your story even more absurd sounding than before.
I just gave you that "one person" you're looking for -- Lt Col. Robert Bowman, who attended U of Chicago with Wolfowitz, Feith and other neocons. He says, "that's all they ever talked about." But you chose to ignore it, just like you ignore everything. If that's not enough for you, here's 220 more senior military, intelligence, law enforcement and government officials.
Just admit it -- there will NEVER be enough proof for you, even if the 9/11 equivalent of E. Howard Hunt makes a deathbed confession.
Originally posted by dereks
Originally posted by Myendica
i believe they state, "at nearly free-fall speed."
No they do not - see above, - "2. Buildings fell at free fall speed. "
So how fast should the buildings have fallen then?
Originally posted by VitriolAndAngst
How can people "Move On" when the attack on the middle class -- and the continuous resource wars are still going on?
Whatever you think about 9/11 -- it ENABLED the Patriot Act, Domestic Spying, ending of international treaties against torture, Constitutional Protections and such.
Originally posted by L1U2C3I4F5E6R
To all truthers (stroytellers). YOU lot are the ones who want an investigation. YOU lot are questioning everything and coming up with story's so far removed from normality. YOU are the ones who wish to Challenge the OS and make changes to it and have someone admit to something.
So it is up to you when you come to a thread like this, to present your argument in a concise and literal way with rock solid proof to back it up.
So far evryone on here has rehashed parts or most of the old news. You keep asking me to prove it was doens by terrorists. MY proof is that the OS says it was. I need NO further proof as I am not seeking change to it. YOU are. So YOU NEED to be the ones with proof. YOU are not grown up enough to handle the truth no matter what it is. YOU lot (just the ones on this post) have a warped view of reality. Does everything in life have to be a conspiracy. Can we NOT move on and help to progress. This arguing is what will KEEP thos in power there so much longer as the split in civilian relationships is too great.
Originally posted by AwakeinNM
reply to post by L1U2C3I4F5E6R
My point is, there is plenty of evidence in the videos and debris. Laws of physics that apply to every object on this planet. Probabilities that exist based on the known facts. You just choose to ignore them and believe the official story. That makes you as guilty of having some kind of faith as the "religious" people you mock.
You better get a checkup, charlie.